South Carolina schools may teach gun safety and training

Little-Acorn

Gold Member
Jun 20, 2006
10,025
2,410
290
San Diego, CA
Leftist fanatics have been trying for years to keep people, especially children, away from any hint that guns might actually be useful for good purposes. They have striven unceasingly to keep people terrified at even the slightest mention of a gun, and making sure that no one would have the slightest idea what to do if they actually see a gun (in a gun store or a friend's hands etc.).

Now South Carolina is proposing that children get basic gun and safety training in school - something that used to be common at schools just a few generations ago.

If it passes, this would undermine the left's entire agenda of keeping people terrified of guns. If people - especially children - start realizing that guns are no more dangerous than automobiles or power saws, the leftists will have no end of difficulty restricting or banning them. And if normal people find that guns can actually make societies safer when criminals become afraid of assaulting or robbing a person who might have one and knows how to use it... they might start finding they have no use for leftists any more.

Count on this initiative to be fought with everything the leftists can bring to bear: Insults, screaming, fear, lying, etc. (In other words, they will act as they always do. Only more so.)

---------------------------------------------

SC Schools May Teach Gun Training

SC Schools May Teach Gun Training
House bill calls for 3-week study of 2nd Amendment

By Arden Dier, Newser Staff
Posted Jan 9, 2015 8:12 AM CST

(Newser) – Two new bills could bring gun education, including gun training, to South Carolina students. The first is from Rep. Alan Clemmons, who tells WCIV that teachers don't focus enough on the Second Amendment, and that a lack of knowledge about guns and gun safety implies "the gun is an evil object." He cites the example of a student who got into trouble after writing a story about shooting a dinosaur. Zero-tolerance policies are misguided, says Clemmons, whose bill would have students spend three weeks learning about guns and gun safety each year, based on a curriculum backed by the NRA, the Greenville News reports.

Some aren't keen about involving the NRA in state education, but that's hardly the only element of contention. Clemmons' bill would also create a Second Amendment Awareness Day in all state schools, as well as a poster or essay contest with the theme "The Right to Bear Arms: One American Right Protecting All Others," to be held on Dec. 15. The date has drawn criticism because it's one day after the Sandy Hook school shooting anniversary, though Clemmons says he's open to changing it.
 
No Planned Parenthood but the NRA is just fine in schools? Got it. Gun nuts, fucking nuts since guns have but one purpose, killing. Next up, Understanding Racism, by the KKK.
 
I have no problem with gun safety being taught on schools.
 
Doesn't seem that long ago when Calif. state legislator Don Perata pushed Calif Senate Bill SB-23, banning certain guns that were no more dangerous than any others, but had scarier-looking features (pistol grips, flash hiders, magazines over 10 rounds etc., restricting them even more from schools etc.

Many schools' shooting teams (some of which had been producing teenage Olympic shooters) folded as a result. When Perata was asked about that result, he simply replied, "Well, that's too bad. Maybe they need to move to a different state if that's what they want."

The arrogance of these leftist fanatics must be seen to be believed.

Looks like the pendulum is starting to swing back to the side of sanity at last.
 
As I predicted, the usual leftist fanatics on the board have no reply to the facts in the article. They can only point out that guns are dangerous when improperly used. Naturally, you won't find them pointing that out about cars or power tools, which kill far more people than guns. When they do, then you can assume they have people's safety in mind, rather than their own abject fear and desire to control others.

They offer nothing but their usual namecalling, insults, profanity, and lies.

These people are so predictable.....

:rolleyes-41:
 
Last edited:
As I predicted, the usual leftist fanatics on the board have no reply to the facts in the article. They can only point out that guns are dangerous when improperly used. Naturally, you won't find them pointing that out about cars or power tools, which kill far more people than guns. When they do, then you can assume they have people's safety in mind, rather than their own abject fear and desire to control others.

:rolleyes-41:
Are you ok with sex education being taught in schools?
 
Doesn't seem that long ago when Calif. state legislator Don Perata pushed Calif Senate Bill SB-23, banning certain guns that were no more dangerous than any others, but had scarier-looking features (pistol grips, flash hiders, magazines over 10 rounds etc., restricting them even more from schools etc.

Many schools' shooting teams (some of which had been producing teenage Olympic shooters) folded as a result. When Perata was asked about that result, he simply replied, "Well, that's too bad. Maybe they need to move to a different state if that's what they want."

The arrogance of these leftist fanatics must be seen to be believed.

Looks like the pendulum is starting to swing back to the side of sanity at last.

Cuz they hain't nuttin' more "sane" than shootin' shit, right?

I tell you what, if you've never been to South Carolina they have a whole lot more important stuff to be teaching than this.
 
Last edited:
As I predicted, the usual leftist fanatics on the board have no reply to the facts in the article. They can only point out that guns are dangerous when improperly used. Naturally, you won't find them pointing that out about cars or power tools, which kill far more people than guns. When they do, then you can assume they have people's safety in mind, rather than their own abject fear and desire to control others.

:rolleyes-41:
Are you ok with sex education being taught in schools?
I'm sure for him guns are safe, condoms are dangerous.
 
Doesn't seem that long ago when Calif. state legislator Don Perata pushed Calif Senate Bill SB-23, banning certain guns that were no more dangerous than any others, but had scarier-looking features (pistol grips, flash hiders, magazines over 10 rounds etc., restricting them even more from schools etc.

Many schools' shooting teams (some of which had been producing teenage Olympic shooters) folded as a result. When Perata was asked about that result, he simply replied, "Well, that's too bad. Maybe they need to move to a different state if that's what they want."

The arrogance of these leftist fanatics must be seen to be believed.

Looks like the pendulum is starting to swing back to the side of sanity at last.

Cuz they hain't nuttin' more "sane" than shootin' shit, right?

I prefer that students be able to render a gun they find harmless, not run away in terror and leave it for the next kid to pick up. But that's just the adults talking.
 
I have no problem with gun safety being taught on schools.
Nor do I....they can add a gun range. Good idea. Make money too renting the range out to the public after school hours.

That is an interesting idea. Make those wishing to use the range pay a small fee and it could be used an opportunity to train those in gun safety as well. The school gets a little extra cash and a population educated on gun safety.
 

Forum List

Back
Top