RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - Ohio: Romney vs. Obama Let's go right through them: Washington Post poll: Obama +8 Washington Post Poll (washingtonpost.com) But check out these internals!: Now, I don't know if that's how it's weighted or, it's simply that's all they could get through land lines, but that's HUGELY disproportionate to the real voters. They find voter registrations are just about equal. There are not 10% more Democrats than Republicans in the voting populace. In other words, inaccurate poll! Now, the next poll: Gravis Marketing: Obama +1 Report, Ohio Sep 21-22, 2012(1) Just really really really oversampling Democrats! Purple Strategies Obama +4 http://www.purplestrategies.com/wp-content/uploads/PurplePoll-9.21.12.pdf This is actually the most fair poll yet, but when you put the poll equally and consider the margin of error, it's a toss up! Fox News: Obama +7 RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - Ohio: Romney vs. Obama Now, THIS is really oversampled. You take away the over sampling and it puts it back again as a toss up! University of Cincinnati: Obama +5 Divided state still a toss-up | Cincinnati.com | cincinnati.com Now, the U of Cin won't give their internals. Which I find interesting BUT if you take their online poll: Cincinnati.com | Results: | cincinnati.com It goes HUGE for Romney. Yes, I know an online poll is not a "scientific poll" but I bet it reaches more people than these land line polls Last but not Least: Rasmussen: Obama +1 Election 2012: Ohio President - Rasmussen Reports You have to pay these greedy buggers to get their internals, but with a margin of error of 4.5%, once again toss up! These polls are all over the place and most of them are demonstrably oversampled. If they have to do that to show Obama ahead, what's it really going to be like on election day. We shall see. November is coming!