- Thread starter
- #21
There is a difference between Rom and Obama.
Obama wants us to use the failed romnycare. Romney doesn't want everyone to use it.
He can see it failed in his state and knows it will crash nationally. Obama still has the blinders on, thinking it will work.
As far as voting goes? I haven't voted "for" anyone since Bush Sr. Since then it's all been against the other guy.
Except for the Bush re-election. That was the only one I have never voted on.
So essentially the only difference is words, not actions.
Pretty much what I've always thought about the 2 parties
Not exactly.
Roms is at a state level. If you wanna vote in crap that will crush your state, go ahead, when taxpers start to leave and takers move in, don't be shocked.
States rights.
obamacare is on everyone. When it crushes the economy, those that don't want to go down with the ship will have to migrate to another country. Since few will do that...
I'm talking about principles, when in office their actions have been based on the same principle that big government healthcare is a good idea.
I don't take politicians at their word, only actions. His actions show he's a liberal, same with Huckabee, they seem like the most likely candidates to me hence no excitement about the election. The hoopla of it all will be a little annoying but that's about the only emotion I'll feel.