- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,026
- 47,214
- 2,180
I've read it 1000 times. It doesn't say what you claim.This whole long ridiculous rant and not once was the term "well regulated" referenced in any way. Why is that?
Because the amendment states the militia needs to be well regulated, not the people.
No it doesn't.
reread it
Because the amendment states the militia needs to be well regulated, not the people.
It doesn't say: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.?
Apparently you failed English. The dependent clause is purely explanatory. It has no legal implications.