Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
:no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/46421608/GettyImages_50477040.0.0.0.jpg)
You expect media matters to provide actual context? They’re as biased as the KKK. The real issue is that MSM cites them as a news source. That shows how far gone the MSM is. Pravda.As a counter argument to Tucker Carlson's rant in that radio program, you got nuthin' fella.
The danger of trolling is that one day, years from now, someone might find it and present it as serious.You expect media matters to provide actual context? They’re as biased as the KKK. The real issue is that MSM cites them as a news source. That shows how far gone the MSM is. Pravda.As a counter argument to Tucker Carlson's rant in that radio program, you got nuthin' fella.
Welcome to the NewSSR.
What are you talking about? The actual article he wrote is in the link and I read it. His statement about women fantasizing of being raped by three men is compared to men fantasizing of raping women; he was talking about the power imbalance that had been unconsciously repeated over and over in male/female relationships, even though laws had changed. I don't see how this remotely compares to the things Tucker Carlson was saying on that radio show.You expect media matters to provide actual context? They’re as biased as the KKK. The real issue is that MSM cites them as a news source. That shows how far gone the MSM is. Pravda.As a counter argument to Tucker Carlson's rant in that radio program, you got nuthin' fella.
Welcome to the NewSSR.
I've never understood this shock jock stuff or why it's popular. If it's supposed to be satire, it should be presented as such, but it isn't. It's real venting with the veneer of being a joke.The danger of trolling is that one day, years from now, someone might find it and present it as serious.You expect media matters to provide actual context? They’re as biased as the KKK. The real issue is that MSM cites them as a news source. That shows how far gone the MSM is. Pravda.As a counter argument to Tucker Carlson's rant in that radio program, you got nuthin' fella.
Welcome to the NewSSR.
What are you talking about? The actual article he wrote is in the link and I read it. His statement about women fantasizing of being raped by three men is compared to men fantasizing of raping women; he was talking about the power imbalance that had been unconsciously repeated over and over in male/female relationships, even though laws had changed. I don't see how this remotely compares to the things Tucker Carlson was saying on that radio show.
Im talking about the propaganda article from MM and the MSM citing that. I don’t give a fuck about sanders. He’s a Soviet.What are you talking about? The actual article he wrote is in the link and I read it. His statement about women fantasizing of being raped by three men is compared to men fantasizing of raping women; he was talking about the power imbalance that had been unconsciously repeated over and over in male/female relationships, even though laws had changed. I don't see how this remotely compares to the things Tucker Carlson was saying on that radio show.You expect media matters to provide actual context? They’re as biased as the KKK. The real issue is that MSM cites them as a news source. That shows how far gone the MSM is. Pravda.As a counter argument to Tucker Carlson's rant in that radio program, you got nuthin' fella.
Welcome to the NewSSR.
The humor comes in the imagined meltdown the target is supposedly having.I've never understood this shock jock stuff or why it's popular. If it's supposed to be satire, it should be presented as such, but it isn't. It's real venting with the veneer of being a joke.
You obviously mean the MSM citing media matters.Its fun to watch people be desperate and fail......fun I say!
You're not going to give me a brief compare and contrast essay on the two men's comments?What are you talking about? The actual article he wrote is in the link and I read it. His statement about women fantasizing of being raped by three men is compared to men fantasizing of raping women; he was talking about the power imbalance that had been unconsciously repeated over and over in male/female relationships, even though laws had changed. I don't see how this remotely compares to the things Tucker Carlson was saying on that radio show.
I agree that you dont see the comparison, though I do.
Ah, heck no, I am on lunch break and dont have time for that, sorry.You're not going to give me a brief compare and contrast essay on the two men's comments?
