flacaltenn
Diamond Member
Because the Watt site is fastidious with posting retractions and corrections, I wanted to test my trust in it.
Trakar -- I worked hard to do this --- there will be QUIZ tomorrow morning on the contents. Since it was SUCH an issue that you see the paper for yourself.. Now remember -- don't be ironic --- read the WHOLE THING and show up for the quiz...
And READ MY FOOTER again...
Trakar -- I worked hard to do this --- there will be QUIZ tomorrow morning on the contents. Since it was SUCH an issue that you see the paper for yourself.. Now remember -- don't be ironic --- read the WHOLE THING and show up for the quiz...
And READ MY FOOTER again...
http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/13421/2011/acp-11-13421-2011.pdf
The precision achieved by the most advanced generation
of radiation budget satellites is indicated by the planetary en-
ergy imbalance measured by the ongoing CERES (Clouds
and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System) instrument (Loeb et
al., 2009), which finds a measured 5-yr-mean imbalance of
6.5 W m−2 (Loeb et al., 2009). Because this result is implau-
sible, instrumentation calibration factors were introduced to
reduce the imbalance to the imbalance suggested by climate
models, 0.85 W m−2 (Loeb et al., 2009).
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 13421–13449, 2011
Last edited: