So Who You Liberals Got For 2020?

[HereWeGoAgain]

It is amazing how many people on political forums are so woefully ignorant of political history. The eventually nominee is almost never being talked about 3 years out. Obama was not a serious contender in 2005, Bush II was not even being talked about in 97 nobody had even heard of Bill Clinton 3 years before that election. Oh, and then there is Trump who three years out was not even sure which party he was going to run with.

Hillary is the only person that was a serious contender early on that got the nomination and that was done with a lot of help from her friends

So Hillary to run a 3rd time? You need drug tested!

If you think I just said that Hillary should run again then you are the one needing to be tested. The point is that nobody being talked about now will end up being the nominee if history holds true. I brought up Hillary only to show she was the one exception to the rule, not because she would run again. And she was only the exception to the rule because the DNC did everything they could to make sure she won. Had they started on level playing fields she would likely not have won. Which in and of itself supports my point that the early names never win because the other side has had 3 years to attack them at every turn.

So you sneak someone in at the last minute(like barry)in hopes that there wont be enough time to uncover how crooked they are?

And what does that say about dem voters? They'll vote dem even if they know nothing about their candidate.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

If the economy performs as predicted by many, it won't matter who the Democrats run from here on out.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Joe "Paws" Biden?
AL "The freak" Franken?
"Mad" Maxine Watters?
Kamala " invisible planes"Harris?
Hillary "crime wave" Clinton?
Bernie "socialist" Sanders?

Honest to god you ignorant if you just remove the names using four little rules...
1, They cannot be in or on their way to prison.
2, They cannot be in or on their way to a mental asylum
3, They cannot be in or on their way to a nursing home.
4, They cannot be a pervert.

That wipes out your ENTIRE leadership. Hell if those rules applied to your voters you would have no base. So who is going to lift up that torn tatterd nasty ratty flag of the DNC and lead you forward?

Fury

/——/ How about the Weiner Hilder ticket?

 

[basquebromance]

there are a lot of options

Wacky Cory Booker
Uncle Joe Biden
Crazy Kamala Harris
Low Energy John Hickenlooper
Crooked Luis Gutierrez
Pocahontas

even Creepy Al Frankenstein might run

 

[DarkFury]

When Nancy Pelosi takes back over as speaker next year, Trump and Pence will get impeached, Nancy will be President and will name Hillary her VP then she'll step down and the rightfully elected person will finally be seated.

The president and the vice would both have to be killed at the same time for your idiot Nancy idea.
I really don't think that is going to happen.

 

[DarkFury]

there are a lot of options

Wacky Cory Booker
Uncle Joe Biden
Crazy Kamala Harris
Low Energy John Hickenlooper
Crooked Luis Gutierrez
Pocahontas

even Creepy Al Frankenstein might run

Gut is already leaving office for sneaking illegal family into the country. He's done!

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Joe "Paws" Biden?
AL "The freak" Franken?
"Mad" Maxine Watters?
Kamala " invisible planes"Harris?
Hillary "crime wave" Clinton?
Bernie "socialist" Sanders?

Honest to god you ignorant if you just remove the names using four little rules...
1, They cannot be in or on their way to prison.
2, They cannot be in or on their way to a mental asylum
3, They cannot be in or on their way to a nursing home.
4, They cannot be a pervert.

That wipes out your ENTIRE leadership. Hell if those rules applied to your voters you would have no base. So who is going to lift up that torn tatterd nasty ratty flag of the DNC and lead you forward?

Fury

You didn’t mention Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren. But let’s be honest, if Flynn or something else takes Trump down before 2020, other than the sitting Veep, the GOP doesn’t have a lot of leadership either.

 

[basquebromance]

there are a lot of options

Wacky Cory Booker
Uncle Joe Biden
Crazy Kamala Harris
Low Energy John Hickenlooper
Crooked Luis Gutierrez
Pocahontas

even Creepy Al Frankenstein might run

Gut is already leaving office for sneaking illegal family into the country. He's done!

Gutiérrez eyes 2020 presidential run

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It is amazing how many people on political forums are so woefully ignorant of political history. The eventually nominee is almost never being talked about 3 years out. Obama was not a serious contender in 2005, Bush II was not even being talked about in 97 nobody had even heard of Bill Clinton 3 years before that election. Oh, and then there is Trump who three years out was not even sure which party he was going to run with.

Hillary is the only person that was a serious contender early on that got the nomination and that was done with a lot of help from her friends

So Hillary to run a 3rd time? You need drug tested!

If you think I just said that Hillary should run again then you are the one needing to be tested. The point is that nobody being talked about now will end up being the nominee if history holds true. I brought up Hillary only to show she was the one exception to the rule, not because she would run again. And she was only the exception to the rule because the DNC did everything they could to make sure she won. Had they started on level playing fields she would likely not have won. Which in and of itself supports my point that the early names never win because the other side has had 3 years to attack them at every turn.

So you sneak someone in at the last minute(like barry)in hopes that there wont be enough time to uncover how crooked they are?

And what does that say about dem voters? They'll vote dem even if they know nothing about their candidate.

It is not just the Dems, the same thing has held true for the GOP. How many people were talking about Trump in 2013? Nobody? In 2013 it was not even sure if Trump ran what party he would be a part of.

How many people were talking about Bush II in 1997, just about nobody. It was not till late 1998 that Bush II started to get any real traction and became one of the front runners.

Do you know nothing about political history?

 

[DarkFury]

Joe "Paws" Biden?
AL "The freak" Franken?
"Mad" Maxine Watters?
Kamala " invisible planes"Harris?
Hillary "crime wave" Clinton?
Bernie "socialist" Sanders?

Honest to god you ignorant if you just remove the names using four little rules...
1, They cannot be in or on their way to prison.
2, They cannot be in or on their way to a mental asylum
3, They cannot be in or on their way to a nursing home.
4, They cannot be a pervert.

That wipes out your ENTIRE leadership. Hell if those rules applied to your voters you would have no base. So who is going to lift up that torn tatterd nasty ratty flag of the DNC and lead you forward?

Fury

You didn’t mention Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren. But let’s be honest, if Flynn or something else takes Trump down before 2020, other than the sitting Veep, the GOP doesn’t have a lot of leadership either.

got cruz got Ryan got rubio

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

It is amazing how many people on political forums are so woefully ignorant of political history. The eventually nominee is almost never being talked about 3 years out. Obama was not a serious contender in 2005, Bush II was not even being talked about in 97 nobody had even heard of Bill Clinton 3 years before that election. Oh, and then there is Trump who three years out was not even sure which party he was going to run with.

Hillary is the only person that was a serious contender early on that got the nomination and that was done with a lot of help from her friends

So Hillary to run a 3rd time? You need drug tested!

If you think I just said that Hillary should run again then you are the one needing to be tested. The point is that nobody being talked about now will end up being the nominee if history holds true. I brought up Hillary only to show she was the one exception to the rule, not because she would run again. And she was only the exception to the rule because the DNC did everything they could to make sure she won. Had they started on level playing fields she would likely not have won. Which in and of itself supports my point that the early names never win because the other side has had 3 years to attack them at every turn.

So you sneak someone in at the last minute(like barry)in hopes that there wont be enough time to uncover how crooked they are?

And what does that say about dem voters? They'll vote dem even if they know nothing about their candidate.

It is not just the Dems, the same thing has held true for the GOP. How many people were talking about Trump in 2013? Nobody? In 2013 it was not even sure if Trump ran what party he would be a part of.

How many people were talking about Bush II in 1997, just about nobody. It was not till late 1998 that Bush II started to get any real traction and became one of the front runners.

Do you know nothing about political history?

I stopped reading when you brought Trump up as an unknown.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

there are a lot of options

Wacky Cory Booker
Uncle Joe Biden
Crazy Kamala Harris
Low Energy John Hickenlooper
Crooked Luis Gutierrez
Pocahontas

even Creepy Al Frankenstein might run

Gut is already leaving office for sneaking illegal family into the country. He's done!

Gutiérrez eyes 2020 presidential run

You gotta be kidding.

 

[DarkFury]

It is amazing how many people on political forums are so woefully ignorant of political history. The eventually nominee is almost never being talked about 3 years out. Obama was not a serious contender in 2005, Bush II was not even being talked about in 97 nobody had even heard of Bill Clinton 3 years before that election. Oh, and then there is Trump who three years out was not even sure which party he was going to run with.

Hillary is the only person that was a serious contender early on that got the nomination and that was done with a lot of help from her friends

So Hillary to run a 3rd time? You need drug tested!

If you think I just said that Hillary should run again then you are the one needing to be tested. The point is that nobody being talked about now will end up being the nominee if history holds true. I brought up Hillary only to show she was the one exception to the rule, not because she would run again. And she was only the exception to the rule because the DNC did everything they could to make sure she won. Had they started on level playing fields she would likely not have won. Which in and of itself supports my point that the early names never win because the other side has had 3 years to attack them at every turn.

So you sneak someone in at the last minute(like barry)in hopes that there wont be enough time to uncover how crooked they are?

And what does that say about dem voters? They'll vote dem even if they know nothing about their candidate.

It is not just the Dems, the same thing has held true for the GOP. How many people were talking about Trump in 2013? Nobody? In 2013 it was not even sure if Trump ran what party he would be a part of.

How many people were talking about Bush II in 1997, just about nobody. It was not till late 1998 that Bush II started to get any real traction and became one of the front runners.

Do you know nothing about political history?

Trump broke political history. Families are no longer annoited to office. Dynasty is over.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It is amazing how many people on political forums are so woefully ignorant of political history. The eventually nominee is almost never being talked about 3 years out. Obama was not a serious contender in 2005, Bush II was not even being talked about in 97 nobody had even heard of Bill Clinton 3 years before that election. Oh, and then there is Trump who three years out was not even sure which party he was going to run with.

Hillary is the only person that was a serious contender early on that got the nomination and that was done with a lot of help from her friends

So Hillary to run a 3rd time? You need drug tested!

If you think I just said that Hillary should run again then you are the one needing to be tested. The point is that nobody being talked about now will end up being the nominee if history holds true. I brought up Hillary only to show she was the one exception to the rule, not because she would run again. And she was only the exception to the rule because the DNC did everything they could to make sure she won. Had they started on level playing fields she would likely not have won. Which in and of itself supports my point that the early names never win because the other side has had 3 years to attack them at every turn.

So you sneak someone in at the last minute(like barry)in hopes that there wont be enough time to uncover how crooked they are?

And what does that say about dem voters? They'll vote dem even if they know nothing about their candidate.

It is not just the Dems, the same thing has held true for the GOP. How many people were talking about Trump in 2013? Nobody? In 2013 it was not even sure if Trump ran what party he would be a part of.

How many people were talking about Bush II in 1997, just about nobody. It was not till late 1998 that Bush II started to get any real traction and became one of the front runners.

Do you know nothing about political history?

I stopped reading when you brought Trump up as an unknown.

So, you think that in 2013 Trump was being talked about as the favorite to win the GOP nomination? Really? Would you mind sharing some of those drugs with the rest of us? What world do you people even live in?

 

[mudwhistle]

Joe "Paws" Biden?
AL "The freak" Franken?
"Mad" Maxine Watters?
Kamala " invisible planes"Harris?
Hillary "crime wave" Clinton?
Bernie "socialist" Sanders?

Honest to god you ignorant if you just remove the names using four little rules...
1, They cannot be in or on their way to prison.
2, They cannot be in or on their way to a mental asylum
3, They cannot be in or on their way to a nursing home.
4, They cannot be a pervert.

That wipes out your ENTIRE leadership. Hell if those rules applied to your voters you would have no base. So who is going to lift up that torn tatterd nasty ratty flag of the DNC and lead you forward?

Fury

Don't forget Pocahontas.....

 

[basquebromance]

there are a lot of options

Wacky Cory Booker
Uncle Joe Biden
Crazy Kamala Harris
Low Energy John Hickenlooper
Crooked Luis Gutierrez
Pocahontas

even Creepy Al Frankenstein might run

Gut is already leaving office for sneaking illegal family into the country. He's done!

Gutiérrez eyes 2020 presidential run

You gotta be kidding.

no joke!

and the NY Times want LA Mayor Eric Garcetti to run...

 

[rightwinger]

there are a lot of options

Wacky Cory Booker
Uncle Joe Biden
Crazy Kamala Harris
Low Energy John Hickenlooper
Crooked Luis Gutierrez
Pocahontas

even Creepy Al Frankenstein might run

Running against a Republican under indictment

 

[basquebromance]

Joe "Paws" Biden?
AL "The freak" Franken?
"Mad" Maxine Watters?
Kamala " invisible planes"Harris?
Hillary "crime wave" Clinton?
Bernie "socialist" Sanders?

Honest to god you ignorant if you just remove the names using four little rules...
1, They cannot be in or on their way to prison.
2, They cannot be in or on their way to a mental asylum
3, They cannot be in or on their way to a nursing home.
4, They cannot be a pervert.

That wipes out your ENTIRE leadership. Hell if those rules applied to your voters you would have no base. So who is going to lift up that torn tatterd nasty ratty flag of the DNC and lead you forward?

Fury

Don't forget Pocahontas.....

i didnt

 

[miketx]

Joe "Paws" Biden?
AL "The freak" Franken?
"Mad" Maxine Watters?
Kamala " invisible planes"Harris?
Hillary "crime wave" Clinton?
Bernie "socialist" Sanders?

Honest to god you ignorant if you just remove the names using four little rules...
1, They cannot be in or on their way to prison.
2, They cannot be in or on their way to a mental asylum
3, They cannot be in or on their way to a nursing home.
4, They cannot be a pervert.

That wipes out your ENTIRE leadership. Hell if those rules applied to your voters you would have no base. So who is going to lift up that torn tatterd nasty ratty flag of the DNC and lead you forward?

Fury

 

[basquebromance]

there are a lot of options

Wacky Cory Booker
Uncle Joe Biden
Crazy Kamala Harris
Low Energy John Hickenlooper
Crooked Luis Gutierrez
Pocahontas

even Creepy Al Frankenstein might run

Running against a Republican under indictment

you mean a Republican incumbent who is more popular than Saint Reagan