So where do USMB members stand on this SCJOTUS nomination...

[Pogo]

Some are dancing the River Dance, others are locked in their crying closets.

"River dance" eh?

Oshun?

Get hep to the flow.

Get hip to to the consultation of the boolawee.

Buguyati sapirigi, numa.

Garciaparra Saltalamacchia.

However the Bugatti reference is apt...

 

[Aba Incieni]

Some are dancing the River Dance, others are locked in their crying closets.

"River dance" eh?

Oshun?

Get hep to the flow.

Get hip to to the consultation of the boolawee.

Buguyati sapirigi, numa.

Garciaparra Saltalamacchia.

Hillary lo odia mas que todos.

 

[JakeStarkey]

As long as the uphold the COTUS, I am fine with the picks.

 

[hadit]

A conservative woman on SCOTUS would solve many of our political issues. I believe many more women will vote for conservative issues because of her appointment. However, the two men are equally qualified;

Yes, but she's one of their coveted protected classes. They could hardly deny her without exposing themselves even further as ID political fakers.

They wouldn't care, because principles mean little to them. They claim to champion minorities, but let a black man dare to be conservative and they seek to destroy him by any means available. The same holds true for women. If she is nominated, expect the most vile, most extreme, most vicious anti-female attacks from them. The fact that she has multiple children will become an issue.

 

[Aba Incieni]

A conservative woman on SCOTUS would solve many of our political issues. I believe many more women will vote for conservative issues because of her appointment. However, the two men are equally qualified;

Yes, but she's one of their coveted protected classes. They could hardly deny her without exposing themselves even further as ID political fakers.

They wouldn't care, because principles mean little to them. They claim to champion minorities, but let a black man dare to be conservative and they seek to destroy him by any means available. The same holds true for women. If she is nominated, expect the most vile, most extreme, most vicious anti-female attacks from them. The fact that she has multiple children will become an issue.

Yeah, I know.

Exposing them even more as political identity frauds.

 

[JakeStarkey]

^^^

 

[Flash]

I like the chick. Seems to be the most Conservative.

If that asshole Obama got to appoint those two extreme far Left shithead dingbats then Trump need to counter with a good solid Conservatives.

Other.

Have my favorite but that matters nothing as it ain’t my call. I simply trust my president to pick a solid conservative who while help keep America the bastion of freedom and liberty our founders intended. And if that jerks the lefties around a bit in coming decades that’s life. Elections have consequences as a not very bright former president once said.

Watching the Leftists maul a Christian woman who has just recently been confirmed 55-43 right before the election would rile up the conservative voting base BIGLY. Watching Leftists demonize 70 million U.S. Catholics right before the election would be YUGE.



The U.S. Senate confirmed Barrett to the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on October 31, by a 55-43 vote. Three Democrats voted for her and two did not vote. It would not be easy to justify changing their votes now, as she has served unexceptionably. At her confirmation hearings, Senator Dianne Feinstein, the Judiciary Committee’s aged ranking Democrat, asked Barrett about her religious views, and the nominee responded that no judge should allow personal views, whether based on faith or anything else, to influence the imposition of the law. “The dogma lives loudly within you, and that is a concern,” Feinstein said infamously. This was an outrageous comment; Feinstein doesn’t know anything about the dogma of the Roman Catholic Church, and she has no idea what privately motivates Judge Barrett.

Nominating Amy Barrett Would Be Political Genius - American Greatness

A conservative woman on SCOTUS would solve many of our political issues. I believe many more women will vote for conservative issues because of her appointment. However, the two men are equally qualified;

Hate to be the one to break astounding news y'all but a SCOTUS judge ain't supposed to look after "conservative" interests, "left" interests, "right" interests or any kind of "religious" interests. They're supposed to enforce the Constitution.

Y'all demonstrated the shortcomings of civics classes, or lack thereof. And/or the pitfalls of partisan hackery.

Those shithead dingbat asshole Moon Bat bitches that Obama appointed sure as hell looks after Libtard interest.

Where were those bitches when they were basing immigration "law: on what Trump said as a candidate rather than what the law really said? The law was nowhere to be found. Just partisan bias.

Quit your bitching. If Obama gets to appoint extreme far Left Moon Bats then Trump can counter that stupidity by appointing Conservatives. Elections have consequences. Probably the main reason why Trump got elected was the potential for multiple Supreme Court replacements.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Other.

Have my favorite but that matters nothing as it ain’t my call. I simply trust my president to pick a solid conservative who while help keep America the bastion of freedom and liberty our founders intended. And if that jerks the lefties around a bit in coming decades that’s life. Elections have consequences as a not very bright former president once said.

The Commies Are Cruzing for a Bruising

I disagree with the Conservatives' interpretation of the Constitution, but from the Warren SCROTUS on, the Supreme Law has tilted so far Left that only a Far Right appointee can set it straight. I recommend Cruz, who's really matured since he got booed at the RNC, unlike McCain and Rubio.

 

[Pogo]

I like the chick. Seems to be the most Conservative.

If that asshole Obama got to appoint those two extreme far Left shithead dingbats then Trump need to counter with a good solid Conservatives.

Other.

Have my favorite but that matters nothing as it ain’t my call. I simply trust my president to pick a solid conservative who while help keep America the bastion of freedom and liberty our founders intended. And if that jerks the lefties around a bit in coming decades that’s life. Elections have consequences as a not very bright former president once said.

Watching the Leftists maul a Christian woman who has just recently been confirmed 55-43 right before the election would rile up the conservative voting base BIGLY. Watching Leftists demonize 70 million U.S. Catholics right before the election would be YUGE.



The U.S. Senate confirmed Barrett to the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on October 31, by a 55-43 vote. Three Democrats voted for her and two did not vote. It would not be easy to justify changing their votes now, as she has served unexceptionably. At her confirmation hearings, Senator Dianne Feinstein, the Judiciary Committee’s aged ranking Democrat, asked Barrett about her religious views, and the nominee responded that no judge should allow personal views, whether based on faith or anything else, to influence the imposition of the law. “The dogma lives loudly within you, and that is a concern,” Feinstein said infamously. This was an outrageous comment; Feinstein doesn’t know anything about the dogma of the Roman Catholic Church, and she has no idea what privately motivates Judge Barrett.

Nominating Amy Barrett Would Be Political Genius - American Greatness

A conservative woman on SCOTUS would solve many of our political issues. I believe many more women will vote for conservative issues because of her appointment. However, the two men are equally qualified;

Hate to be the one to break astounding news y'all but a SCOTUS judge ain't supposed to look after "conservative" interests, "left" interests, "right" interests or any kind of "religious" interests. They're supposed to enforce the Constitution.

Y'all demonstrated the shortcomings of civics classes, or lack thereof. And/or the pitfalls of partisan hackery.

Those shithead dingbat asshole Moon Bat bitches that Obama appointed sure as hell looks after Libtard interest.

Where were those bitches when they were basing immigration "law: on what Trump said as a candidate rather than what the law really said? The law was nowhere to be found. Just partisan bias.

Quit your bitching. If Obama gets to appoint extreme far Left Moon Bats then Trump can counter that stupidity by appointing Conservatives. Elections have consequences. Probably the main reason why Trump got elected was the potential for multiple Supreme Court replacements.

You didn't address the point at all. If anything you just confirmed it.

 

[Flash]

I like the chick. Seems to be the most Conservative.

If that asshole Obama got to appoint those two extreme far Left shithead dingbats then Trump need to counter with a good solid Conservatives.

Other.

Have my favorite but that matters nothing as it ain’t my call. I simply trust my president to pick a solid conservative who while help keep America the bastion of freedom and liberty our founders intended. And if that jerks the lefties around a bit in coming decades that’s life. Elections have consequences as a not very bright former president once said.

Watching the Leftists maul a Christian woman who has just recently been confirmed 55-43 right before the election would rile up the conservative voting base BIGLY. Watching Leftists demonize 70 million U.S. Catholics right before the election would be YUGE.



The U.S. Senate confirmed Barrett to the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on October 31, by a 55-43 vote. Three Democrats voted for her and two did not vote. It would not be easy to justify changing their votes now, as she has served unexceptionably. At her confirmation hearings, Senator Dianne Feinstein, the Judiciary Committee’s aged ranking Democrat, asked Barrett about her religious views, and the nominee responded that no judge should allow personal views, whether based on faith or anything else, to influence the imposition of the law. “The dogma lives loudly within you, and that is a concern,” Feinstein said infamously. This was an outrageous comment; Feinstein doesn’t know anything about the dogma of the Roman Catholic Church, and she has no idea what privately motivates Judge Barrett.

Nominating Amy Barrett Would Be Political Genius - American Greatness

A conservative woman on SCOTUS would solve many of our political issues. I believe many more women will vote for conservative issues because of her appointment. However, the two men are equally qualified;

Hate to be the one to break astounding news y'all but a SCOTUS judge ain't supposed to look after "conservative" interests, "left" interests, "right" interests or any kind of "religious" interests. They're supposed to enforce the Constitution.

Y'all demonstrated the shortcomings of civics classes, or lack thereof. And/or the pitfalls of partisan hackery.

Those shithead dingbat asshole Moon Bat bitches that Obama appointed sure as hell looks after Libtard interest.

Where were those bitches when they were basing immigration "law: on what Trump said as a candidate rather than what the law really said? The law was nowhere to be found. Just partisan bias.

Quit your bitching. If Obama gets to appoint extreme far Left Moon Bats then Trump can counter that stupidity by appointing Conservatives. Elections have consequences. Probably the main reason why Trump got elected was the potential for multiple Supreme Court replacements.

You didn't address the point at all. If anything you just confirmed it.

I addressed it real well Moon Bats. You just didn't want to accept the truth.

You don't get to apply the standard of appointing judges that will uphold the law when there are Republicans and then get to appoint Left Wing partisan assholes when the Democrats are in power.

Where were you when that asshole Obama appointed those two partisan Moon Bats shitheads who wouldn't know the law if it was engraved on their foreheads.

Maybe Trump would have to go look for very Conservative judges as a counter deterrence if there weren't those for Left Wing assholes on the bench.

 

[Meister]

Strategically, who should get the nod and for what reason?

The Hill's Morning Report — Sponsored by Better Medicare Alliance — Anticipation builds for Trump’s SCOTUS pick

Are any of them particularly against medicare? I want them, so that red state populations will vanish.

Becareful on what you wish for. If they go after medicare they will go after your welfare.

 

[williepete]

A conservative woman on SCOTUS would solve many of our political issues. I believe many more women will vote for conservative issues because of her appointment. However, the two men are equally qualified;

An added bonus is that women generally live longer than men and she's only 46. She'd be a sane voice on the bench for a long time. With seven kids, 5 hers, one with special needs and two Haitian adoptees, she has a vested interest in saving this country from the constitution-hating leftists.

Opinion | Amy Coney Barrett is a superb judge, not glazed-eyed cultist

 

[BlackFlag]

Strategically, who should get the nod and for what reason?

The Hill's Morning Report — Sponsored by Better Medicare Alliance — Anticipation builds for Trump’s SCOTUS pick

Are any of them particularly against medicare? I want them, so that red state populations will vanish.

Becareful on what you wish for. If they go after medicare they will go after your welfare.

It will kill off such a yuge chunk of red state populations; I’m all for it

 

[JakeStarkey]

Strategically, who should get the nod and for what reason?

The Hill's Morning Report — Sponsored by Better Medicare Alliance — Anticipation builds for Trump’s SCOTUS pick

Are any of them particularly against medicare? I want them, so that red state populations will vanish.

Becareful on what you wish for. If they go after medicare they will go after your welfare.

They will go after none of it, or the genxrs and boomers will vote them all out of office.

 

[Penelope]

Strategically, who should get the nod and for what reason?

The Hill's Morning Report — Sponsored by Better Medicare Alliance — Anticipation builds for Trump’s SCOTUS pick

Are any of them particularly against medicare? I want them, so that red state populations will vanish.

Becareful on what you wish for. If they go after medicare they will go after your welfare.

Medicare is not welfare. The VA healthcare is though unless wounded in battle.

 

[Penelope]

Strategically, who should get the nod and for what reason?

The Hill's Morning Report — Sponsored by Better Medicare Alliance — Anticipation builds for Trump’s SCOTUS pick

Are any of them particularly against medicare? I want them, so that red state populations will vanish.

Becareful on what you wish for. If they go after medicare they will go after your welfare.

It will kill off such a yuge chunk of red state populations; I’m all for it

Do you even know what Medicare is, sounds like you don't.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Strategically, who should get the nod and for what reason?

The Hill's Morning Report — Sponsored by Better Medicare Alliance — Anticipation builds for Trump’s SCOTUS pick

Are any of them particularly against medicare? I want them, so that red state populations will vanish.

Becareful on what you wish for. If they go after medicare they will go after your welfare.

Medicare is not welfare. The VA healthcare is though unless wounded in battle.

Nope. It is America's commitment to take care of those who served.

 

[Penelope]

Strategically, who should get the nod and for what reason?

The Hill's Morning Report — Sponsored by Better Medicare Alliance — Anticipation builds for Trump’s SCOTUS pick

Are any of them particularly against medicare? I want them, so that red state populations will vanish.

Becareful on what you wish for. If they go after medicare they will go after your welfare.

Medicare is not welfare. The VA healthcare is though unless wounded in battle.

Nope. It is America's commitment to take care of those who served.

They if not wounded in the war, can get on other health insurance. It like a job now, unless we have a war. I'm not buying it that we need to police the world, playing war games.

 

[Sahba]

Apparently Kethlidge has a dubious record when it comes to immigration...

SSCOTUS Frontrunner Raymond Kethledge's Record Reveals Immigration Weakness

 

[Sahba]

An interesting website that has been an accurate predictor in the past. It's not exactly mirroring the 'conventional wisdom' that's being touted right now. Lol, perhaps USMB members (via this poll) are smarter than the pundits... we shall see.

FantasySCOTUS - Who will Trump nominate for the 9th Justice?