So progressives want “sanctuary cities”, uh?

[miketx]

Straighf out of the “careful what you wish for” pages...

Several conservative Illinois lawmakers have a taken a page from the progressive’s playbook to protect gun rights by creating “sanctuary” counties for gun owners.

The left was adamant about having a lawless society. Well, they are getting it.

More Illinois counties join Effingham County; pass ‘sanctuary’ resolutions to protect gun rights

Here is the problem. The Constitution does not require state and local officials to enforce federal immigration law. However states are allowed to regulate guns as long as they do not run afoul of the Second Amendment. Those officials can be charged by the state and removed.

There is no language in the constitution that allows guns to be regulated. looks you may be another one who doesn't know what "shall not be infringed means".

Our Commerce Clause allows for the regulation of Commerce regarding Arms.

It's unconstitutional.

 

[otto105]

Straighf out of the “careful what you wish for” pages...

Several conservative Illinois lawmakers have a taken a page from the progressive’s playbook to protect gun rights by creating “sanctuary” counties for gun owners.

The left was adamant about having a lawless society. Well, they are getting it.

More Illinois counties join Effingham County; pass ‘sanctuary’ resolutions to protect gun rights

Here is the problem. The Constitution does not require state and local officials to enforce federal immigration law. However states are allowed to regulate guns as long as they do not run afoul of the Second Amendment. Those officials can be charged by the state and removed.

There is no language in the constitution that allows guns to be regulated. looks you may be another one who doesn't know what "shall not be infringed means".

Our Commerce Clause allows for the regulation of Commerce regarding Arms.

It's unconstitutional.

Fake news

 

[miketx]

Straighf out of the “careful what you wish for” pages...

Several conservative Illinois lawmakers have a taken a page from the progressive’s playbook to protect gun rights by creating “sanctuary” counties for gun owners.

The left was adamant about having a lawless society. Well, they are getting it.

More Illinois counties join Effingham County; pass ‘sanctuary’ resolutions to protect gun rights

So you're admitting that the gun class is lawless...

Nice

Sheriff is the top politician in the county and can do that if he wants.

Seems like to me that in rural white a Merica any sheriff should be more concerned about opioid addiction and death.


But hey, guns....

I never knew of any sheriffs that died from that. Do you have a link, or is this just more libtard smoke and deflect?

 

[miketx]

Straighf out of the “careful what you wish for” pages...
The left was adamant about having a lawless society. Well, they are getting it.

More Illinois counties join Effingham County; pass ‘sanctuary’ resolutions to protect gun rights

Here is the problem. The Constitution does not require state and local officials to enforce federal immigration law. However states are allowed to regulate guns as long as they do not run afoul of the Second Amendment. Those officials can be charged by the state and removed.

There is no language in the constitution that allows guns to be regulated. looks you may be another one who doesn't know what "shall not be infringed means".

Our Commerce Clause allows for the regulation of Commerce regarding Arms.

It's unconstitutional.

Fake news

So you are one that has no idea what "shall not be infringed" means.

 

[danielpalos]

Straighf out of the “careful what you wish for” pages...

Several conservative Illinois lawmakers have a taken a page from the progressive’s playbook to protect gun rights by creating “sanctuary” counties for gun owners.

The left was adamant about having a lawless society. Well, they are getting it.

More Illinois counties join Effingham County; pass ‘sanctuary’ resolutions to protect gun rights

Here is the problem. The Constitution does not require state and local officials to enforce federal immigration law. However states are allowed to regulate guns as long as they do not run afoul of the Second Amendment. Those officials can be charged by the state and removed.

There is no language in the constitution that allows guns to be regulated. looks you may be another one who doesn't know what "shall not be infringed means".

Our Commerce Clause allows for the regulation of Commerce regarding Arms.

It's unconstitutional.

How so? The power to regulate Commerce is clearly in our federal Constitution.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Straighf out of the “careful what you wish for” pages...

Several conservative Illinois lawmakers have a taken a page from the progressive’s playbook to protect gun rights by creating “sanctuary” counties for gun owners.

The left was adamant about having a lawless society. Well, they are getting it.

More Illinois counties join Effingham County; pass ‘sanctuary’ resolutions to protect gun rights

Here is the problem. The Constitution does not require state and local officials to enforce federal immigration law. However states are allowed to regulate guns as long as they do not run afoul of the Second Amendment. Those officials can be charged by the state and removed.

There is no language in the constitution that allows guns to be regulated. looks you may be another one who doesn't know what "shall not be infringed means".

Our Commerce Clause allows for the regulation of Commerce regarding Arms.

Not if such regulation infringes (by definition, not decision) on the right.

 

[otto105]

Here is the problem. The Constitution does not require state and local officials to enforce federal immigration law. However states are allowed to regulate guns as long as they do not run afoul of the Second Amendment. Those officials can be charged by the state and removed.

There is no language in the constitution that allows guns to be regulated. looks you may be another one who doesn't know what "shall not be infringed means".

Our Commerce Clause allows for the regulation of Commerce regarding Arms.

It's unconstitutional.

Fake news

So you are one that has no idea what "shall not be infringed" means.

I'm on the "well regulated" side and requiring an actual militia.


Say which one are you in?

 

[danielpalos]

Straighf out of the “careful what you wish for” pages...

Several conservative Illinois lawmakers have a taken a page from the progressive’s playbook to protect gun rights by creating “sanctuary” counties for gun owners.

The left was adamant about having a lawless society. Well, they are getting it.

More Illinois counties join Effingham County; pass ‘sanctuary’ resolutions to protect gun rights

Here is the problem. The Constitution does not require state and local officials to enforce federal immigration law. However states are allowed to regulate guns as long as they do not run afoul of the Second Amendment. Those officials can be charged by the state and removed.

There is no language in the constitution that allows guns to be regulated. looks you may be another one who doesn't know what "shall not be infringed means".

Our Commerce Clause allows for the regulation of Commerce regarding Arms.

Not if such regulation infringes (by definition, not decision) on the right.

There is no infringement in the buying and selling of Arms, but by the police power. We have a Tenth Amendment.

 

[miketx]

Straighf out of the “careful what you wish for” pages...
The left was adamant about having a lawless society. Well, they are getting it.

More Illinois counties join Effingham County; pass ‘sanctuary’ resolutions to protect gun rights

Here is the problem. The Constitution does not require state and local officials to enforce federal immigration law. However states are allowed to regulate guns as long as they do not run afoul of the Second Amendment. Those officials can be charged by the state and removed.

There is no language in the constitution that allows guns to be regulated. looks you may be another one who doesn't know what "shall not be infringed means".

Our Commerce Clause allows for the regulation of Commerce regarding Arms.

Not if such regulation infringes (by definition, not decision) on the right.

There is no infringement in the buying and selling of Arms, but by the police power. We have a Tenth Amendment.

Nonsense. There is all kinds of infringement. And no I won't name them because it has been done before and all liberals do is smoke and lie when you post it. I done.

 

[danielpalos]

Here is the problem. The Constitution does not require state and local officials to enforce federal immigration law. However states are allowed to regulate guns as long as they do not run afoul of the Second Amendment. Those officials can be charged by the state and removed.

There is no language in the constitution that allows guns to be regulated. looks you may be another one who doesn't know what "shall not be infringed means".

Our Commerce Clause allows for the regulation of Commerce regarding Arms.

Not if such regulation infringes (by definition, not decision) on the right.

There is no infringement in the buying and selling of Arms, but by the police power. We have a Tenth Amendment.

Nonsense. There is all kinds of infringement. And no I won't name them because it has been done before and all liberals do is smoke and lie when you post it. I done.

Our Second Amendment is about what is Necessary to the security of a free State, not the whole and entire concept of natural and individual rights. It says so in the first clause.

 

[jillian]

Straighf out of the “careful what you wish for” pages...

Several conservative Illinois lawmakers have a taken a page from the progressive’s playbook to protect gun rights by creating “sanctuary” counties for gun owners.

The left was adamant about having a lawless society. Well, they are getting it.

More Illinois counties join Effingham County; pass ‘sanctuary’ resolutions to protect gun rights

No loon. It means local law enforcement don’t work for the feds.

You don’t even know what sanctuary city means, whiny little silly boy

 

[P@triot]

Actually , not all illegals have committed a crime .

 

[P@triot]

No loon. It means local law enforcement don’t work for the feds.

Uh...what does “working” for the “feds” have to do with anything? If you are in law enforcement, you are supposed to enforce the law.

 

[P@triot]

And we have free speech . You can tell people there’s police around the corner.

Snowflake, “free speech” does not extend to tipping off criminals of a pending raid. That is called “aiding & abetting” and it is illegal.

Your ignorance is truly astounding.

 

[P@triot]

Actually , not all illegals have committed a crime .

Literally...I....I just.....

 

[P@triot]

However states are allowed to regulate guns as long as they do not run afoul of the Second Amendment.

Dumb ass...if you are “regulating guns” then you are running “afoul of the 2nd Amendment”.

.....shall not be infringed

 

[P@triot]

Our Commerce Clause allows for the regulation of Commerce regarding Arms.

....shall NOT be infringed

 

[P@triot]

I'm on the "well regulated" side and requiring an actual militia.

So you’re on the “side” of ignorance? Got it.

...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed

Like all rights, snowflake, they belong to the people (without any requirements other than citizenship). It doesn’t say “the right of the militia”. It says the right of the people.

 

[P@triot]

Actually , not all illegals have committed a crime .

Timmy is literally too stupid to understand that they are called “illegals” because they broke the law just by being here. So, yes Timmy, 100% of illegals have in fact committed a crime.

Good grief you are the quintessential low IQ voter that the Dumbocrats desire.

 

[Timmy]

Actually , not all illegals have committed a crime .

Timmy is literally too stupid to understand that they are called “illegals” because they broke the law just by being here. So, yes Timmy, 100% of illegals have in fact committed a crime.

Good grief you are the quintessential low IQ voter that the Dumbocrats desire.

Let me drop some knowledge on you rubes . Being “illegal” is not a crime . It’s true ! Don’t believe the righty propaganda .

Now entering the US without going through customs is a crime . That being said , 40% of “illegals” enter legally and overstay . So they wouldn’t count .

And now you know ! Any other immigration Qs I can answer for ya ?