Charles_Main
AR15 Owner
Considering they're supposed to be paying right now about 35%, I don't quite see how you think you've scored ANY points on me in this. I'd say that clearly shows there are some loopholes that should be closed.
But you did a GREAT JOB of deflection from the actual question at hand:
Taxes are historically low, and yet you fucktards still are claiming he's hurting our economy. Despite 27 straight months of private sector jobs growth, the DOW doubling, all of these things you give him NO credit for, but when you just take two minutes to dissect your grievances, all you're left with is a pile of bullshit.
Just because taxes are low, does not mean Raising them in a Rescission wont hurt the Economy.
Besides your study completely Ignores the effects of all the Regulations, and Non Income Taxes in Obama's Policy.
It also completely Ignores State and Local Taxes.
As usual.
What, exactly, is Obama's responsibility for state and local taxes again?
And clearly, as has been shown in my other previous school lessons, raising taxes on the rich is not harmful to recession recovery. Ask William Jefferson Clinton.
ROFLMAO? what is Obama's Responsibility for State and local Taxes? need I remind you that the ACA asks the States to massively expand their MC rolls but only helps them pay for it for the first couple of years? Do you really think the States wont have to Raise taxes to cover it?
That is just one Example, the Federal Government often enacts Policy that Forces the States to Raise Taxes. It's is completely Ignorant to imply the President has no effect on State and Local Taxes.
Besides, I was not Blaming Obama for State and Local Taxes, and you know that. You are just avoiding the issue as usual. I was simply pointing out that your study claims Americans are paying less in Taxes, but it completely ignores state and Local Taxes in it's Findings.
I told you why I think Obama is Hurting America. Same Reason I think Bush did. Spending to FUCKING MUCH MONEY.
Period.