So, Bill O'Reilly is toast @ Fox

Status
Not open for further replies.
Too little too late, good riddance and all that BIT

Odd that faux fired him since RWNJs idolize those who molest women - like drumpf. Even those who don't worship slime like them, they believe women "asked for it", deserve it, want it, dressed provocatively, yadda yadda.

As noted in post #2, there are still plenty of liars left.

BTW, if you want real comedy, find O'Reilly's reading of his own porn. It was played on MSM so its out there someplace. Its a hoot and just about as sexy as reading a carburetor manual. What a dud and no wonder drumpf likes him.

Like peas and carrots.
mg_trump_pissgate_comp02.gif
 
I can see the demrats are throwing the first stone here.....they are all angels

Sickening hypocrisy


Hypocrisy is you siding with known molesters - like O'Reilly and drumpf - against women.

THAT is hypocrisy.

Hypocrisy is also faux doing nothing until it hit their bottom line. Says all you need to know about faux.

:puke3:

No, we get it.........JFK and Clinton are in the same boat. Course you knew that. That's what I call HYPOCRISY.
 
Good to see he's being held accountable. Really, personal accountability is SUPPOSED to be what the conservatives stand for. I didn't think for a second he was innocent. He's obviously got a problem with his penis & status................ But I will miss his show. While he's an arrogant fuck, he generally has keen insight, at least portrays a level head & good ethics, & offers a fair analysis as compared to his peers.

"Accountable" for what? I thought leftwingers believed in "innocent until proven guilty." But we all know that only believe in that when their heroes are wriggling on the hook. They circled the wagons and defended the Blowjob in Chief to the last man.

How would you know "He's obviously got a problem with his penis & status?" Do you have access to the facts of anything he's been accused of?
 
Good to see he's being held accountable. Really, personal accountability is SUPPOSED to be what the conservatives stand for. I didn't think for a second he was innocent. He's obviously got a problem with his penis & status................ But I will miss his show. While he's an arrogant fuck, he generally has keen insight, at least portrays a level head & good ethics, & offers a fair analysis as compared to his peers.

"Accountable" for what? I thought leftwingers believed in "innocent until proven guilty." But we all know that only believe in that when their heroes are wriggling on the hook. They circled the wagons and defended the Blowjob in Chief to the last man.

How would you know "He's obviously got a problem with his penis & status?" Do you have access to the facts of anything he's been accused of?


FIRED!
 
Don't worry, you still got me, here at USMB, to tell you what the truth is.
perhaps since you've become a lol truth teller you can tell us why O'Reilly's good friend pussy grabbing tax avoiding drump doesn't man up and step down too?

So, Edds........while I am less than enthused about Trump (especially since the bombing of the Syrian airport) since the false flag "chemical attack"? Why are you so concerned about something Trump said back in 2005 when he was engaging in "guy talk" but you totally gloss over what Bill "drop trou" has done and all his trips to Jeffery Epstein's pedophile island getaway that also included the Hildebeast? Be consistent, Edds..........the time for partisanship politics because we are aligned with any alleged "side" is over because we are up to our necks in shit. I can prove to you beyond any doubt that the sweat of our brow that we are compelled to pay called the "income tax" is nothing but interest paid to the mostly foreign owned Federal Reserve central bank that creates this fiat currency out of nothing of an intrinsic value. The Federal Reserve Act and the 16th amendment (that never had enough states to ratify it) were shoved down our throats in the same year....you think that was just coincidence? If so.....sit back, relax and let me tell you the story as to how we became indentured debt slaves and how our labor was pledged as collateral/ surety against the debt due to the March 1933 Chapter 11 bankruptcy of USA.INC............
 
Good to see he's being held accountable. Really, personal accountability is SUPPOSED to be what the conservatives stand for. I didn't think for a second he was innocent. He's obviously got a problem with his penis & status................ But I will miss his show. While he's an arrogant fuck, he generally has keen insight, at least portrays a level head & good ethics, & offers a fair analysis as compared to his peers.

I won't miss him. He got too big for his own good, and believed he could do whatever he pleased, or whomever he pleased. He is no better than a typical politician who thinks societal rules don't apply to him. No doubt he is guilty of all or some of the accusations, and I applaud his departure.


O'Reilly was a Jesuit schooled and trained sack of catholic shit...."goodbye and good riddance".......
 
what sealed the fate on his guilt was glaring. He didn't even so much as try and defend himself. When in the hell has that ever happened?

oh yeah ..


Fuck O'really?
 
Good to see he's being held accountable. Really, personal accountability is SUPPOSED to be what the conservatives stand for. I didn't think for a second he was innocent. He's obviously got a problem with his penis & status................ But I will miss his show. While he's an arrogant fuck, he generally has keen insight, at least portrays a level head & good ethics, & offers a fair analysis as compared to his peers.


Ha.Ha.--I really don't know how you could stand the guy. His "War on Christmas" every year was a little too much to take. His continual interruptions of his guests--was way over the top.

FOX News--all the way down the chain seems to have serious problems with women. Misogyny--to disfunctional men looking for extra martial affairs with their female guests and women who work at FOX.

159667_600.jpg
 
what sealed the fate on his guilt was glaring. He didn't even so much as try and defend himself. When in the hell has that ever happened?

oh yeah ..


Fuck O'really?
He never got a chance to defend himself. He was fired. No one asked him how he felt about it. He was fired when he was out of the country on vacation.
 
Good to see he's being held accountable. Really, personal accountability is SUPPOSED to be what the conservatives stand for. I didn't think for a second he was innocent. He's obviously got a problem with his penis & status................ But I will miss his show. While he's an arrogant fuck, he generally has keen insight, at least portrays a level head & good ethics, & offers a fair analysis as compared to his peers.

"Accountable" for what? I thought leftwingers believed in "innocent until proven guilty." But we all know that only believe in that when their heroes are wriggling on the hook. They circled the wagons and defended the Blowjob in Chief to the last man.

How would you know "He's obviously got a problem with his penis & status?" Do you have access to the facts of anything he's been accused of?

He simply strikes me as a guy with penisitis and statusitis. I could be wrong, but as a snap determination, I believe there's at least some truth to it.
 
Don't worry, you still got me, here at USMB, to tell you what the truth is.
perhaps since you've become a lol truth teller you can tell us why O'Reilly's good friend pussy grabbing tax avoiding drump doesn't man up and step down too?

So, Edds........while I am less than enthused about Trump (especially since the bombing of the Syrian airport) since the false flag "chemical attack"? Why are you so concerned about something Trump said back in 2005 when he was engaging in "guy talk" but you totally gloss over what Bill "drop trou" has done and all his trips to Jeffery Epstein's pedophile island getaway that also included the Hildebeast? Be consistent, Edds..........the time for partisanship politics because we are aligned with any alleged "side" is over because we are up to our necks in shit. I can prove to you beyond any doubt that the sweat of our brow that we are compelled to pay called the "income tax" is nothing but interest paid to the mostly foreign owned Federal Reserve central bank that creates this fiat currency out of nothing of an intrinsic value. The Federal Reserve Act and the 16th amendment (that never had enough states to ratify it) were shoved down our throats in the same year....you think that was just coincidence? If so.....sit back, relax and let me tell you the story as to how we became indentured debt slaves and how our labor was pledged as collateral/ surety against the debt due to the March 1933 Chapter 11 bankruptcy of USA.INC............

So, Edds........while I am less than enthused about Trump (especially since the bombing of the Syrian airport) since the false flag "chemical attack"? Why are you so concerned about something Trump said back in 2005 when he was engaging in "guy talk" but you totally gloss over what Bill "drop trou" has done and all his trips to Jeffery Epstein's pedophile island getaway that also included the Hildebeast? Be consistent, Edds..........the time for partisanship politics because we are aligned with any alleged "side" is over because we are up to our necks in shit. I can prove to you beyond any doubt that the sweat of our brow that we are compelled to pay called the "income tax" is nothing but interest paid to the mostly foreign owned Federal Reserve central bank that creates this fiat currency out of nothing of an intrinsic value.

Wow! That pivot could turn windmills for months! How the hell did you manage to go there from a discussion about Bill O'Reilly having been fired?

I can prove to you beyond any doubt that the sweat of our brow that we are compelled to pay called the "income tax" is nothing but interest paid to the mostly foreign owned Federal Reserve central bank that creates this fiat currency out of nothing of an intrinsic value.

I'm dying to see the clear, direct and incontrovertible proof of that. You can start by producing uncontrived evidence that the Federal Reserve is expressly owned (thus controlled) and operated by someone. (Bearing in mind that successfully starting is not the same thing as successfully completing the proof.)

Sidebar:
Are there even foreign owned member banks in the federal reserve system?
There definitely are banks that are 25% or more foreign owned and that operate in the U.S., about 45 or 50 of them as far as I know. Whether they constitute a majority of the influence upon the federal reserve is not known to me. What is certain is that mere existence isn't nearly as relevant as is the influence they may individually or severally have.​

creates this fiat currency out of nothing of an intrinsic value.

Well, short of water, maybe land and sunlight (which isn't tangible enough to act as a medium of exchange), what has intrinsic value? The value of everything else is derived from a property the item has and that humans construe as preferable (for whatever reason) to some other item. Even foodstuffs' value is derived, though the core components (carbs, proteins and fats) of a food item does indeed have intrinsic value, but those items are not generally found independently of the food item that bears them. Rice, for example, is more valuable in some places than are potatoes, yet the reverse is true in other places.

You decry that our monetary system is based on "nothing" having intrinsic value, and you, apparently, would prefer a system based on an item having intrinsic value as the medium of exchange, yet things that do have intrinsic value are impractical to use for that purpose.
 
Good to see he's being held accountable. Really, personal accountability is SUPPOSED to be what the conservatives stand for. I didn't think for a second he was innocent. He's obviously got a problem with his penis & status................ But I will miss his show. While he's an arrogant fuck, he generally has keen insight, at least portrays a level head & good ethics, & offers a fair analysis as compared to his peers.


Ha.Ha.--I really don't know how you could stand the guy. His "War on Christmas" every year was a little too much to take. His continual interruptions of his guests--was way over the top.

FOX News--all the way down the chain seems to have serious problems with women. Misogyny--to disfunctional men looking for extra martial affairs with their female guests and women who work at FOX.

159667_600.jpg

Of course Fox has a problem with misogyny. It has been a right wing meme for years to point out how beautiful Fox News anchors are compared to others, but is it a coincidence that the most qualified "journalists" they could find all look like supermodels? :lol:
 
Watched some of The last Word tonight.

How does that show stay on the air with suck low ratings ?
 
Don't worry, you still got me, here at USMB, to tell you what the truth is.
perhaps since you've become a lol truth teller you can tell us why O'Reilly's good friend pussy grabbing tax avoiding drump doesn't man up and step down too?

So, Edds........while I am less than enthused about Trump (especially since the bombing of the Syrian airport) since the false flag "chemical attack"? Why are you so concerned about something Trump said back in 2005 when he was engaging in "guy talk" but you totally gloss over what Bill "drop trou" has done and all his trips to Jeffery Epstein's pedophile island getaway that also included the Hildebeast? Be consistent, Edds..........the time for partisanship politics because we are aligned with any alleged "side" is over because we are up to our necks in shit. I can prove to you beyond any doubt that the sweat of our brow that we are compelled to pay called the "income tax" is nothing but interest paid to the mostly foreign owned Federal Reserve central bank that creates this fiat currency out of nothing of an intrinsic value. The Federal Reserve Act and the 16th amendment (that never had enough states to ratify it) were shoved down our throats in the same year....you think that was just coincidence? If so.....sit back, relax and let me tell you the story as to how we became indentured debt slaves and how our labor was pledged as collateral/ surety against the debt due to the March 1933 Chapter 11 bankruptcy of USA.INC............

So, Edds........while I am less than enthused about Trump (especially since the bombing of the Syrian airport) since the false flag "chemical attack"? Why are you so concerned about something Trump said back in 2005 when he was engaging in "guy talk" but you totally gloss over what Bill "drop trou" has done and all his trips to Jeffery Epstein's pedophile island getaway that also included the Hildebeast? Be consistent, Edds..........the time for partisanship politics because we are aligned with any alleged "side" is over because we are up to our necks in shit. I can prove to you beyond any doubt that the sweat of our brow that we are compelled to pay called the "income tax" is nothing but interest paid to the mostly foreign owned Federal Reserve central bank that creates this fiat currency out of nothing of an intrinsic value.

Wow! That pivot could turn windmills for months! How the hell did you manage to go there from a discussion about Bill O'Reilly having been fired?

I can prove to you beyond any doubt that the sweat of our brow that we are compelled to pay called the "income tax" is nothing but interest paid to the mostly foreign owned Federal Reserve central bank that creates this fiat currency out of nothing of an intrinsic value.

I'm dying to see the clear, direct and incontrovertible proof of that. You can start by producing uncontrived evidence that the Federal Reserve is expressly owned (thus controlled) and operated by someone. (Bearing in mind that successfully starting is not the same thing as successfully completing the proof.)

Sidebar:
Are there even foreign owned member banks in the federal reserve system?
There definitely are banks that are 25% or more foreign owned and that operate in the U.S., about 45 or 50 of them as far as I know. Whether they constitute a majority of the influence upon the federal reserve is not known to me. What is certain is that mere existence isn't nearly as relevant as is the influence they may individually or severally have.​

creates this fiat currency out of nothing of an intrinsic value.

Well, short of water, maybe land and sunlight (which isn't tangible enough to act as a medium of exchange), what has intrinsic value? The value of everything else is derived from a property the item has and that humans construe as preferable (for whatever reason) to some other item. Even foodstuffs' value is derived, though the core components (carbs, proteins and fats) of a food item does indeed have intrinsic value, but those items are not generally found independently of the food item that bears them. Rice, for example, is more valuable in some places than are potatoes, yet the reverse is true in other places.

You decry that our monetary system is based on "nothing" having intrinsic value, and you, apparently, would prefer a system based on an item having intrinsic value as the medium of exchange, yet things that do have intrinsic value are impractical to use for that purpose.


"Wow! That pivot could turn windmills for months! How the hell did you manage to go there from a discussion about Bill O'Reilly having been fired?"

Obviously you didn't read the post that I was responding to......now did you? Be honest......


"I'm dying to see the clear, direct and incontrovertible proof of that. You can start by producing uncontrived evidence that the Federal Reserve is expressly owned (thus controlled) and operated by someone. (Bearing in mind that successfully starting is not the same thing as successfully completing the proof.)

The privately owned Federal Reserve Central bank is not listed in the "Government" section of any phone book...at least when we had them. Like the old adage goes? It's about as "Federal as Federal Express"......are you familiar with the book by G. Edward Griffin called "The Creature From Jekyll Island"? and the ones that actually wrote the Fed Act using their mole Senator Nelson Aldrich as their conduit? How it was backdoor-ed through Congress on 12/23/1913 when most of Congress was on their way home for Christmas vacation and how only a voice vote was required? You have some research to do. Woodrow Wilson (a socialist) was the candidate of choice for the banking oligarchs because he was easily manipulated and his handler (Colonel Edward Mandell House) persuaded him to sign off on the Fed Act of 1913 which he later regretted....here is a quote from his memoirs..."A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men." The fact of the matter is that your beloved "gubermint" is a corporate entity that is owned by the international bankers and this goes back to at least 1868. Have you ever wondered why we are still under the Lieber Code?. When the Civil War ended, the hostilities ended but we were (and are) still under military law. When Lincoln was assassinated by agents of the Vatican (which was why there were no diplomatic ties with it until Reagan in 1984). The international bankers are nothing but agents of the Vatican. What we are under right now goes all the way back to the days of Rome.....btw, did you know that the spot of Washington, D.C was at one time called "Rome"? and that Georgetown University is the most prominent Jesuit college in America and his located in Washington, D.C????

"ell, short of water, maybe land and sunlight (which isn't tangible enough to act as a medium of exchange), what has intrinsic value? The value of everything else is derived from a property the item has and that humans construe as preferable (for whatever reason) to some other item. Even foodstuffs' value is derived, though the core components (carbs, proteins and fats) of a food item does indeed have intrinsic value, but those items are not generally found independently of the food item that bears them. Rice, for example, is more valuable in some places than are potatoes, yet the reverse is true in other places.

You decry that our monetary system is based on "nothing" having intrinsic value, and you, apparently, would prefer a system based on an item having intrinsic value as the medium of exchange, yet things that do have intrinsic value are impractical to use for that purpose"

What you do not understand is the very concept of "money"........it is a medium of exchange and anything can be used for that. Back in the day, England used "tally sticks" where sticks of wood were notched and then split down the middle......but people and most importantly, the Knights Templar couldn't create "tally sticks" from chopping down a few trees and removing their branches and create a "medium of exchange" but the Federal Reserve central bank does just that and has since it came into existence in 1913. I bet you are not familiar with the Bretton Woods agreement and how the "dollar" became the world's reserve currency, how that agreement was broken by Nixon and the creation of the "petro-dollar" and why war is waged in the Middle East today in order to protect it....you have some homework to do. Also, do some research on HJR 192, the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy of USA.INC and the gold confiscation of Americans that happened...........if you have any questions, just ask...this is what I do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top