PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #81
She didn't say in a year, she said while in law school which would be three years. And she also said up to, some cost 50 a month. If you add in the exam you have to have every year and then add STD testing if your doctor requires it, because that is not included in a Regular exam it could probably cost close to 3,000 while in law school.
And the girl in the main example was a lesbian who needed birth control for health reasons.
Exactly why 'healthcare' is an entitlement rather than a right.
I don't care how she behaves, nor with whom...as long as she takes responsibility for same.
On the other hand, you are perfectly free to contribute to whatsoever clinic you so desire.
This case was not about the gov't paying for birth control but companies owned by religious organization. And if they do cover it for the employees, these women pay a premium every month plus co pays I am guessing. This isn't a entitlement issue, it is companies discriminating against their female employees. If you cover other elective medicines like Viagra it is discrimination. Also the example this girl used was a girl who needed it for health reasons. One reason I needed birth control in the past.
Stop trying to make it intO the issue you want it to be, and try discussing the real issue that was brought up at these hearings and with the mandate.
"The kind of government program that provides individuals with personal financial benefits..."
Entitlement program: A Glossary of Political Economy Terms - Dr. Paul M. Johnson
When government mandate requires it, it enters the realm of entitlement.
Purchase it yourself, it is a caprice.
You can decide what it is worth to you...
If you'd like to bring up other cases of such, I'm sure we can agree as to which should be individual wishes....