M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
Hmm. Words are not speech; by your argument it is OK to ban words.Because they have yet to head a sound argument to that end, with a specific and detailed explanation as to how said ban does not violate the Constitution.Why would any sane person object to banning the sale of 100 round magazines?
Givie it a try. I dare you.
it's not overly complicated. one could simply argue that a magazine itself was not a weapon.
The issue here is the absence of a sound argument for banning a magazine for a legal weapon that is protected by the constitution. Your statement here does not achieve that goal.further, as a nation we've already decided that the second amendment isn't absolute. we don't allow people to own surface to air missiles, large bombs, or chemical weapons. we limit the arms people have a right to keep all the time.
Yes. And I'm looking for a sound argument fot that ban, one that does violate the Constitution.The question then becomes where is the line and do or should large magazines cross it?
Show this to be the case.it is my opinion that since they serve no other practical purpose than to enable mass shootings...
BTW, I do at least thank you for trying.