I
Indofred
Guest
Should U.S. soldiers be armed?
After all, not one has fired a gun to defend the United states since 1945.
After all, not one has fired a gun to defend the United states since 1945.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No one has managed to cite an instance of a U.S. soldier firing his weapon to defend America.
Can anyone?
No one has managed to cite an instance of a U.S. soldier firing his weapon to defend America.
Can anyone?
No one has managed to cite an instance of a U.S. soldier firing his weapon to defend America.
Can anyone?
On U.S. soil, they can't provide any proof over the past 150 years.
However..............
Overseas, we can point to a few conflicts, only trouble is, it's what those elected tell us to do (even though most have never served).
I challenge those on this board to show where someone who has been in the service has managed to defend this country (either via firing their weapon, or firing their mouth).
No one has managed to cite an instance of a U.S. soldier firing his weapon to defend America.
Can anyone?
On U.S. soil, they can't provide any proof over the past 150 years.
However..............
Overseas, we can point to a few conflicts, only trouble is, it's what those elected tell us to do (even though most have never served).
I challenge those on this board to show where someone who has been in the service has managed to defend this country (either via firing their weapon, or firing their mouth).
No one has managed to cite an instance of a U.S. soldier firing his weapon to defend America.
Can anyone?
On U.S. soil, they can't provide any proof over the past 150 years.
However..............
Overseas, we can point to a few conflicts, only trouble is, it's what those elected tell us to do (even though most have never served).
I challenge those on this board to show where someone who has been in the service has managed to defend this country (either via firing their weapon, or firing their mouth).
I seriously don't expect anyone to be able to answer.
Three Muslim extremists convicted of conspiring to plan an Australian terrorist attack have been sentenced to each serve 18 years' jail.
The men were part of an Islamic terrorist cell who were planning to attack the Holsworthy army barracks in Sydney's south-west.
Their aim was to enter the barracks armed with military weapons and shoot 500 personnel, or as many people as possible, before they were killed or ran out of ammunition.
Wissam Mahmoud Fattal, Saney Edow Aweys and Nayef El Sayed, who had all met at the Preston Mosque, had weapons when they were arrested in August 2009.
The men were connected to the Somali-based terrorist group al-Shabaab, and tried to obtain a fatwa, or religious decree, justifying the attack.
Fattal was covertly videoed walking along the perimeter fence at the army base in what the jury, based on their verdict, believed was in preparation for an attack.
The jury found them guilty following a trial lasting more than five months in which multiple listening devices were played outlining their plan and detailing their extreme religious and political views.
They also had an expressed hatred of Australian people and non-Muslims, who they repeatedly referred to as "infidels".
No one has managed to cite an instance of a U.S. soldier firing his weapon to defend America.
Can anyone?
On U.S. soil, they can't provide any proof over the past 150 years.
However..............
Overseas, we can point to a few conflicts, only trouble is, it's what those elected tell us to do (even though most have never served).
I challenge those on this board to show where someone who has been in the service has managed to defend this country (either via firing their weapon, or firing their mouth).
I seriously don't expect anyone to be able to answer.
No one has managed to cite an instance of a U.S. soldier firing his weapon to defend America.
Can anyone?
Who cares. They are trained in the use of weapons. The idea that soldiers are disarmed on a military base is asinine. ALL soldiers are qualified to carry. Disarming them just makes it easy for the nutters to kill more.
Should U.S. soldiers be armed?
After all, not one has fired a gun to defend the United states since 1945.
Should U.S. soldiers be armed?
After all, not one has fired a gun to defend the United states since 1945.
Why, don't they do enough damage as is?Should U.S. soldiers be armed?
After all, not one has fired a gun to defend the United states since 1945.
Should U.S. soldiers be armed?
After all, not one has fired a gun to defend the United states since 1945.
That is not the appropriate question. What you want to ask
Is should they be armed on base. The military says no. And we all know what lefties the joint chiefs are.