Should the Supreme Court Adopt a Code of Ethics?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Wry Catcher, Nov 6, 2012.

?

Should the Supreme Court adopt a code of ethics?

Poll closed Nov 13, 2012.
  1. Yes

    3 vote(s)
    75.0%
  2. No

    1 vote(s)
    25.0%
  1. Wry Catcher
    Offline

    Wry Catcher Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    31,821
    Thanks Received:
    4,252
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Ratings:
    +8,194
  2. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    81,277
    Thanks Received:
    14,924
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +37,089
    Congress needs to mind its own fucking business. Hey Pat Leahy, how about passing a fucking budget?
     
  3. AmyNation
    Offline

    AmyNation Road Warrior Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2012
    Messages:
    9,021
    Thanks Received:
    1,013
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Currently stationed at the kitchen table
    Ratings:
    +1,016
    Hmmm.

    I can't see why they wouldn't adopt the ethics rules.
     
  4. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,308
    Thanks Received:
    5,014
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,221
    If they did there would only have been 8 judges voting on Obamacare.
     
  5. Contumacious
    Offline

    Contumacious Radical Freedom

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2009
    Messages:
    17,079
    Thanks Received:
    1,471
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Adjuntas, PR , USA
    Ratings:
    +3,859
    The scumbags already have a code of ethics - is called the US Constitution Article III

    .
     
  6. Charles_Main
    Offline

    Charles_Main AR15 Owner

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Messages:
    16,692
    Thanks Received:
    2,238
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    Ratings:
    +2,251
    Don't all judges already have one?
     
  7. nodoginnafight
    Offline

    nodoginnafight No Party Affiliation

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    11,755
    Thanks Received:
    1,069
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    Georgia
    Ratings:
    +1,497
    It's not the job of Congress to ask for them to. Separation of powers and all....

    But I can't see why they shouldn't.
     
  8. Wry Catcher
    Offline

    Wry Catcher Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    31,821
    Thanks Received:
    4,252
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Ratings:
    +8,194
    Congress Frank? Either the Court does so on it's own volition or it won't happen. The only other alternative is a Constitutional Amendment.
     
  9. Wry Catcher
    Offline

    Wry Catcher Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    31,821
    Thanks Received:
    4,252
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Ratings:
    +8,194
    Arrogance + a life time appointment.
     
  10. Wry Catcher
    Offline

    Wry Catcher Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    31,821
    Thanks Received:
    4,252
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Ratings:
    +8,194
    All Federal judges do, except for members of the Supreme Court
     

Share This Page