Should the 26 States That Overturned Obamacare File To Hold Obama in Contempt?

Discussion in 'Healthcare/Insurance/Govt Healthcare' started by Publius1787, Feb 1, 2011.

?

Should the 26 States That Overturned Obamacare File To Hold Obama in Contempt?

  1. Yes

    52.4%
  2. No

    33.3%
  3. Unsure

    4.8%
  4. Other

    9.5%
  1. Publius1787
    Offline

    Publius1787 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,211
    Thanks Received:
    668
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,398
    Should the 26 States That Overturned Obamacare File To Hold Obama in Contempt?

    1. Once a federal judge deems a law unconstitutional, no matter what other judges have ruled, THE PRESIDENT MUST ABIDE BY IT!

    2. The Judge denied those 26 States injunctive relief on the grounds that the ENTIRE LAW IS VOID AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL and there is no evidence that Obama will not abide by the ruling of unconstitutionality. Thus, by ruling Obamacare unconstituional he is by default granting injunctive releif. P75 Vinson opinion

    3. The President refuses to immediatly stop implementing Obamacare and thus, is in violation of his oath of office and in contempt of a federal court ruling.
    4. No stay has yet to be granted by any higher court.
    5. Failure to comply with the Judiciary branch of government and being held in contempt is an impeachable offence! :woohoo:

    Mark Levin Explains This Perfectly!

     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 18, 2014
  2. Megatron
    Offline

    Megatron BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    96
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +7
    Let me guess, you would then have Palin on a white horse ride into the oval office and take command of county?
     
  3. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,791
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,807
    So Obmam did it all?
    None of the congresspersons from those 26 states voted for it?
    Any of them re-elected last nov?
     
  4. Publius1787
    Offline

    Publius1787 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,211
    Thanks Received:
    668
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,398
    It didnt take long for someone to spam and troll their way in to this thread in order to make a compleatly non-related comment. Do you ever think before you post? When a topic is presented do you immediatly speak of someting compleatly different every time you post? What is the reason for your willful ignorance? Are you blinded by you hate for conservatives so much that you lose your presence of mind and are unable to hold a relevent arguement? Any credebility that you think you have is demolished by your above comment. It shows alot about you and the manner you respond to debates in this forum. Please stop making compleatly unrelated remarks in order to gain an unrelated responce in your obvious attempt to hijack this thread.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2011
  5. Megatron
    Offline

    Megatron BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    96
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +7
    No, I have just been stuck in a snow storm the past few days and find it fun to piss off tools like you who get so upset over some of the things people say to you on the internet. My favorite on this site is people like you who try to act so intelligent with words like "compleatly" sound it out buddy ahahah nice try kid
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. Publius1787
    Offline

    Publius1787 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,211
    Thanks Received:
    668
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,398
    Congressmen are popularly elected. The States are compleatly independant of them. Thus you have absolutly no arguement here. It wasnt always this way though. Before progressivs amendmend the constitution, the Senate was chosen by the state legislatures to speak on behalf of the states. If that were true today Obamacare would have never been implemented.

    Furthermore, only Obama can abide by the court ruling because he is the only one responsible for contunuing with the task of enforcing the law. Once a bill is signed in to law Congress has absolutly nothing to do with it unless they wish to amend it by vote. Do I really need to explain all this to you or are you just playing stupid?
     
  7. Publius1787
    Offline

    Publius1787 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,211
    Thanks Received:
    668
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,398
    I Never claimed to be a good speller. In fact, I am famous for my lack of spelling ability. Your accusation of me "trying to be so intellegent" is the equivilancy of entering a fact not in evidence. A claim that you cannot make because you refuse to discuss the topic at hand. And your excuse of accusing me of exactly what you are doing wont hold water here. And I see youve also called me kid. That speaks more about you than anything else youve written. Of course, I am not the guy with the cartoon charicter as his avatar. People make such comments of name calling and belittleing (like what you just did) in order to make themselves feel good about themselves. In reality it shows weakness and the need for artificial self motovation for a weak and unstable mind. As no doubt your boredom in the snow has intensified.
     
    Last edited: Feb 2, 2011
  8. Sallow
    Offline

    Sallow The Big Bad Wolf. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    56,535
    Thanks Received:
    6,132
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    New York City
    Ratings:
    +7,394
    More and more Conservatives are pushing the envelope in terms of trying to unravel the nation (Much like they were in opposition to the American Revolution, instigated the Whiskey Rebellion and started the War of Southern Treachery) and the United States Constitution, and more and more the nation will push back.
     
  9. Megatron
    Offline

    Megatron BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    96
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +7
    I have no desire to discuss the topic at hand with you, none at all, you are not capible of objective discourse kid. All you want to do is attack anyone who has a different view of the world as you. You sir, are a communist.
     
  10. Publius1787
    Offline

    Publius1787 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,211
    Thanks Received:
    668
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,398
    I think you just described yourself perfectly! Though unlike you, I have proof. See here>>> http://www.usmessageboard.com/3277847-post2.html . Is this objective discourse? Atticking someone because their different view of the word huh? You mean like you did in your first post in this thread? Ive been begging for civil discourse. See here >> http://www.usmessageboard.com/3277862-post4.html . Of course, it would be hard for you to have civil discourse if you have a compleat inability to actually comment on the topic of the thread you are posting in. But that would be asking too much from you huh?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page