Should Texas remove Biden from presidential ballot?

[Harpy Eagle]

Should Texas remove Biden from presidential ballot? Biden is committing treason by encouraging the invasion at the Southern border. How are single men coming over from Africa?

Only remedy is to remove Biden, amiright?

Yes, 100% they should.

 

[Smokin' OP]

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Trump was recorded pressuring two Michigan GOP ...​

NBC News
https://www.nbcnews.com › politics › donald-trump › tr...
Dec 22, 2023 — ... Michigan not to certify the 2020 presidential election results in a phone ... fake electors” to reverse the election results in Trump's favor.

Trump Georgia Election Case​

The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › news-event › trump-georg...
The indictment unveiled on Monday, August 14, charges former President Donald J. Trump with 13 crimes related to his efforts to reverse his election loss in ...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No,

No state should deny the citizen their right to vote for any candidate.

The democrat Party is flooding the country with military aged Illegal Aliens, there’s no reason to allow them to have any say in the matter; remove them from the ballot

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Trump was recorded pressuring two Michigan GOP ...​

View attachment 881786
NBC News
https://www.nbcnews.com › politics › donald-trump › tr...
Dec 22, 2023 — ... Michigan not to certify the 2020 presidential election results in a phone ... fake electors” to reverse the election results in Trump's favor.

Trump Georgia Election Case​

View attachment 881787
The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › news-event › trump-georg...
The indictment unveiled on Monday, August 14, charges former President Donald J. Trump with 13 crimes related to his efforts to reverse his election loss in ...





View attachment 881788

Suborning the invasion at the Southern Border IS an insurrection, sedition and treason

 

[Slade3200]

No Congress did not make the declaration democrats whined about one that is all. And again states have no 14th amendment juridiction. So you're confused.

Huh yes they did. They impeached Trump over it

 

[Slade3200]

No Congress did not make the declaration democrats whined about one that is all. And again states have no 14th amendment juridiction. So you're confused.

Since states run their elections they are the only ones who can decide whether applicants are eligible under their standards and the constitution. How else do you think it would be done? Feds don’t run elections

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Since states run their elections they are the only ones who can decide whether applicants are eligible under their standards and the constitution. How else do you think it would be done? Feds don’t run elections

State laws that specify prerequisites for the names of candidates to appear on election ballots are known as ballot access requirements. Generally, states enact ballot access requirements to prevent ballot overcrowding, voter confusion, election fraud, and to facilitate election administration.1 Supreme Court case law demonstrates how ballot access requirements must comport with principles of equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.

While reasonable ballot access requirements are likely to be upheld, the Supreme Court has determined that the Constitution will not permit laws that impermissibly restrict or completely prohibit third-party and independent candidates from qualifying for the ballot.2 According to the Court, on the condition that ballot access requirements do not unfairly or unnecessarily burden new party or independent candidates (that is, candidates not affiliated with a political party), it may be constitutional for states to provide different requirements based on whether a candidate is a nominee of a major political party, a minor or new party, or an independent candidate.3

Loading…

constitution.congress.gov

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Since states run their elections they are the only ones who can decide whether applicants are eligible under their standards and the constitution. How else do you think it would be done? Feds don’t run elections

Wrong

 

[Zincwarrior]

Should Texas remove Biden from presidential ballot? Biden is committing treason by encouraging the invasion at the Southern border. How are single men coming over from Africa?

Only remedy is to remove Biden, amiright?

NonTexans can die in a fire. Pussy butch assholes.

 

[Slade3200]

State laws that specify prerequisites for the names of candidates to appear on election ballots are known as ballot access requirements. Generally, states enact ballot access requirements to prevent ballot overcrowding, voter confusion, election fraud, and to facilitate election administration.1 Supreme Court case law demonstrates how ballot access requirements must comport with principles of equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.

While reasonable ballot access requirements are likely to be upheld, the Supreme Court has determined that the Constitution will not permit laws that impermissibly restrict or completely prohibit third-party and independent candidates from qualifying for the ballot.2 According to the Court, on the condition that ballot access requirements do not unfairly or unnecessarily burden new party or independent candidates (that is, candidates not affiliated with a political party), it may be constitutional for states to provide different requirements based on whether a candidate is a nominee of a major political party, a minor or new party, or an independent candidate.3

Loading…

constitution.congress.gov

That was actually a smart accurate and intelligent post. Did you write it or paste it?

I agree with the contents of the post but don’t see anything in there that would go against a states right to determine a candidate disqualified because of the 14th amendment… it’s written in the constitution and has past president to back up the action

 

[Slade3200]

Wrong

Well since you didn’t provide an actual argument. “Wrong” is simply meaningless

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Throw his wrinkled naked ass in the middle of the Prison Yard, so all the most dangerous inmates can beat his ass and give him some of what he has given little kids.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

That was actually a smart accurate and intelligent post. Did you write it or paste it?

I agree with the contents of the post but don’t see anything in there that would go against a states right to determine a candidate disqualified because of the 14th amendment… it’s written in the constitution and has past president to back up the action

You do realize the 14th amendment is a restriction of the states? And only Congress can enforce the 14th amendment?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Well since you didn’t provide an actual argument. “Wrong” is simply meaningless

You're wrong and the supreme court is going to prove how wrong you are.

 

[Blaster]

Nobody should be removed from a state ballot.

 

[Kondor3]

Should Texas remove Biden from presidential ballot? Biden is committing treason by encouraging the invasion at the Southern border. How are single men coming over from Africa?

Only remedy is to remove Biden, amiright?

Is there a legitimate and defensible Constitutional and lawful basis for such a removal?

A legitimate and defensible basis that will withstand judicial review at the US Appellate and US Supreme Court levels?

Then by all means, have-at... go for it.

In the absence of such a basis... don't even try it... unless you want to look like Loser-Jacka$$e$... again.

 

[Slade3200]

You do realize the 14th amendment is a restriction of the states? And only Congress can enforce the 14th amendment?

False… section 3 of the 14th is a restriction for office holders. Those engaged in or giving aid and comfort to insurrection or rebellion need not apply.

 

[Slade3200]

You're wrong and the supreme court is going to prove how wrong you are.

SCOTUS may very well come to a different opinion which is fine. That’s how our system works. So far the moves made by CO have also been in line with how our system is supposed to work

 

[MagicMike]

Colorado pulled Trump for no reason. Absolutely Texas should.

Not true.
Colorado pulled Trump because according to The U.S. Constitution he is ineligible to be on the ballit.
Texas cannit say the same thing about Biden.

 

[candycorn]

Should Texas remove Biden from presidential ballot? Biden is committing treason by encouraging the invasion at the Southern border. How are single men coming over from Africa?

Only remedy is to remove Biden, amiright?

Looks like your blob was encouraging it too:

From 2019...

Did you want your blob removed too?