Should Statues and Other Memorials To Harvey Milk Also Be Removed?

In fairness, should statues etc. of Harvey Milk displayed in public be removed also?

  • Yes. A disgusting past is a disgusting past.

  • No. It's different with Harvey Milk stuff

  • I think people should be able to vote on what statues stay and which are removed.


Results are only viewable after voting.
All this tearing down of statues is imply the thin edge of the Militant Muslim caprice of The Democrat Party showing itself. Once all the statues are gone then it'll be portraits and then photos. Can't have any images of any thing living or that once might have been alive. Basic Islamic law.
All of this yearning for statues of slave owners and the glorious slave culture implies that the thin edge of the racist caprice of the Republican Party is showing itself again. Soon Republicans will be defending those who bought and sold slaves, not just the ones who fought to protect the right to own slaves. Basic Republican theme.
 
All the statue except the statutory rapist Harvey Milk. The left feels his personal life wasn’t offensive to anyone but just a bevy of ruined young men & boys. But who cares about minors’ & drug addicts’ sensitivities, right?

Poor little Silhouette- still lying day after day trying to foment hatred towards gays and their children.

Her attitude has always been- how dare anyone care about anyone who is gay- or their children- and she is willing to lie to promote her attitude.
 
All this tearing down of statues is imply the thin edge of the Militant Muslim caprice of The Democrat Party showing itself. Once all the statues are gone then it'll be portraits and then photos. Can't have any images of any thing living or that once might have been alive. Basic Islamic law.
All of this yearning for statues of slave owners and the glorious slave culture implies that the thin edge of the racist caprice of the Republican Party is showing itself again. Soon Republicans will be defending those who bought and sold slaves, not just the ones who fought to protect the right to own slaves. Basic Republican theme.
Fine, take them down.

But as you do, also remove the statues of Harvey Milk who kept drug-addled minors and young men as his sodomy slaves. Or don't sex slaves count in your outrage? :popcorn:
 
All the statue except the statutory rapist Harvey Milk. The left feels his personal life wasn’t offensive to anyone but just a bevy of ruined young men & boys. But who cares about minors’ & drug addicts’ sensitivities, right?

Poor little Silhouette- still lying day after day trying to foment hatred towards gays and their children.

Her attitude has always been- how dare anyone care about anyone who is gay- or their children- and she is willing to lie to promote her attitude.
Don’t you have a bull ring argument to make?
 
Syriusly has no argument to make. That's why she resorts to ad hominem. That's the default modus operandi of many LGBT posters here trying to defend the indefensible. When cornered, resort to ad hominem. It's the most sure sign of manifestation of having lost the debate.
 
All this tearing down of statues is imply the thin edge of the Militant Muslim caprice of The Democrat Party showing itself. Once all the statues are gone then it'll be portraits and then photos. Can't have any images of any thing living or that once might have been alive. Basic Islamic law.
All of this yearning for statues of slave owners and the glorious slave culture implies that the thin edge of the racist caprice of the Republican Party is showing itself again. Soon Republicans will be defending those who bought and sold slaves, not just the ones who fought to protect the right to own slaves. Basic Republican theme.
Fine, take them down.

But as you do, also remove the statues of Harvey Milk who kept drug-addled minors and young men as his sodomy slaves. Or don't sex slaves count in your outrage? :popcorn:

You and your constant homosexual sex fantasies- why exactly are you fantasizing about sex slaves?

Certainly Milk's biography doesn't mention them- so clearly they are entirely the product of your sexual fantasies.

How very bizarre.
 
All the statue except the statutory rapist Harvey Milk. The left feels his personal life wasn’t offensive to anyone but just a bevy of ruined young men & boys. But who cares about minors’ & drug addicts’ sensitivities, right?

Poor little Silhouette- still lying day after day trying to foment hatred towards gays and their children.

Her attitude has always been- how dare anyone care about anyone who is gay- or their children- and she is willing to lie to promote her attitude.
Don’t you have a bull ring argument to make?
Indeed I do- that requires actual work.

Shooting down Silhouette's sexual fantasies is just a quick and guilty pleasure.
 
Syriusly has no argument to make. That's why she resorts to ad hominem. That's the default modus operandi of many LGBT posters here trying to defend the indefensible. When cornered, resort to ad hominem. It's the most sure sign of manifestation of having lost the debate.

Since I have been refuting your lies here and on other boards for years now- I will point out that your lies are the default modus operandi of well- you.

It isn't an 'ad hominem' attack to refute your lies and point out your endless and bizarre obsessive hatred of gay Americans and their children.

Its just setting the record straight.
 

Forum List

Back
Top