Questioner
Senior Member
- Nov 26, 2019
- 1,593
- 84
- 50
- Banned
- #1
The reality, of course, rather than the fiction of the illiterates and their imaginary notion of rights, all of which, of course, would be laughed right out of the courtroom if these primates had the gall to actually voice their inane, sub-100 IQ idiocy in such manner.
Is that, per the beautiful letter of the law, state and federal, a "woman" (or anyone else, such as one who "identifies" as one), most definitely, and certainly does give the states a right, within reason, and their primarily male legislators, every right in theory and in practice to regulate and discourage abortion and other practices naturally associated with poverty and illiteracy, much as how our Supreme Court and its articulate members such as Scalia, are rightly primed to repeal Roe vs Wade in its entirety.
Saying otherwise won't change a bit of the law, and the states right and vested interest in doing just that, something which those in the poverty trap, by their own definition and circular reasoning cultish ideologies of self-reinforced victimhood and other social and cultural irrelevance, ultimately, unless the state is "generous" enough to deem otherwise, which is highly unlikely, whether her legislators are thinking men or thinking women.
Perhaps to avoid letting the underclass continue to be misinformed as to them having any "right" to an abortion whatsoever, other than what the state either decides, or what they are able to acquire via back alley means, we should implement a ban against the promotion of abortion, and the intentional or foolish notions and demagoguery, which said sub-literati would otherwise be misinformed in or as to thinking that they have any "rights" what so ever, or that the silly and quaint "speech act" of asserting such a "right", or referencing the sexes involved, will ever make it true.
The reality, is that our statesmen, can, will, and most certainly do, and will continue to decide whether or not one has a right to an abortion, whether the rabble rousers like it or not, their only option, of course is either to comply with the law and its enforcement, or to seek whatever back alley or black market means are available to them, saying otherwise, won't change one damn thing, not that this would stop the sub-literate rabble from continuing to delude and misinform themselves into thinking or believing that they have any imaginary or nonsexist, fictious, mythical "rights" whatsoever.
When push comes to shove, a woman's body is property of the state, first and foremost, so long as the state can and will show a vested interest in that, the only alternative for such idiots being to either wage a little rebellion, which against a well-armed police force, isn't very likely to succeed, in my imagination, even Alinsky admitted that "power" is an illusion, only what the enemy "thinks one has", and I doubt that more legally savvy individuals think that rioters or rabble rousers have any "power at all", let alone even any right to "riot" to begin with, as opposed to peacibly assemble, and hopefully giving the police force authorization to use lethal means of quelling such rioters and rabble rousers as often as humanly possible.
Is that, per the beautiful letter of the law, state and federal, a "woman" (or anyone else, such as one who "identifies" as one), most definitely, and certainly does give the states a right, within reason, and their primarily male legislators, every right in theory and in practice to regulate and discourage abortion and other practices naturally associated with poverty and illiteracy, much as how our Supreme Court and its articulate members such as Scalia, are rightly primed to repeal Roe vs Wade in its entirety.
Saying otherwise won't change a bit of the law, and the states right and vested interest in doing just that, something which those in the poverty trap, by their own definition and circular reasoning cultish ideologies of self-reinforced victimhood and other social and cultural irrelevance, ultimately, unless the state is "generous" enough to deem otherwise, which is highly unlikely, whether her legislators are thinking men or thinking women.
Perhaps to avoid letting the underclass continue to be misinformed as to them having any "right" to an abortion whatsoever, other than what the state either decides, or what they are able to acquire via back alley means, we should implement a ban against the promotion of abortion, and the intentional or foolish notions and demagoguery, which said sub-literati would otherwise be misinformed in or as to thinking that they have any "rights" what so ever, or that the silly and quaint "speech act" of asserting such a "right", or referencing the sexes involved, will ever make it true.
The reality, is that our statesmen, can, will, and most certainly do, and will continue to decide whether or not one has a right to an abortion, whether the rabble rousers like it or not, their only option, of course is either to comply with the law and its enforcement, or to seek whatever back alley or black market means are available to them, saying otherwise, won't change one damn thing, not that this would stop the sub-literate rabble from continuing to delude and misinform themselves into thinking or believing that they have any imaginary or nonsexist, fictious, mythical "rights" whatsoever.
When push comes to shove, a woman's body is property of the state, first and foremost, so long as the state can and will show a vested interest in that, the only alternative for such idiots being to either wage a little rebellion, which against a well-armed police force, isn't very likely to succeed, in my imagination, even Alinsky admitted that "power" is an illusion, only what the enemy "thinks one has", and I doubt that more legally savvy individuals think that rioters or rabble rousers have any "power at all", let alone even any right to "riot" to begin with, as opposed to peacibly assemble, and hopefully giving the police force authorization to use lethal means of quelling such rioters and rabble rousers as often as humanly possible.
