Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
A BAR has a "semi-auto" setting on the selector switch...Just keep the "semi-auto" setting on the safety... It takes a little bit of practice to single-pop a 60...
Can do it with a BAR, too. I'd like to learn to, actually.
*checks wallet* OK, maybe not...no BAR in the budget.
People talk about the 2nd Amendment as if it's somehow sacrosanct. But as anyone can tell you, not all weapons are legal for average Americans to own. I would say that's for good reason. Or as George H. W. Bush (or Dana Carvey) might have said, it wouldn't be prudent.
Just in case you need a reminder, think back to those days of Prohibition when criminals routinely used machine guns in the furtherance of their crimes.
What it proves, of course, is the 2nd Amendment can coexist with limited gun restrictions in the interest of public safety. However, maybe some 2nd Amendment absolutists have a different view and believe that average Americans should be allowed to own fully automatic weapons without the sever restrictions placed on them today.
What say you?
People talk about the 2nd Amendment as if it's somehow sacrosanct. But as anyone can tell you, not all weapons are legal for average Americans to own. I would say that's for good reason. Or as George H. W. Bush (or Dana Carvey) might have said, it wouldn't be prudent.
Just in case you need a reminder, think back to those days of Prohibition when criminals routinely used machine guns in the furtherance of their crimes.
What it proves, of course, is the 2nd Amendment can coexist with limited gun restrictions in the interest of public safety. However, maybe some 2nd Amendment absolutists have a different view and believe that average Americans should be allowed to own fully automatic weapons without the sever restrictions placed on them today.
What say you?
Pay the tax and it is legal to own a fully automatic firearm. I see no need for one, personally, but far be it from me to decide what others need... or want.
Who needs midget porn?Who needs a machine gun?
Why is it YOUR BUSINESS deciding who needs or does not need something that is completely legal?People talk about the 2nd Amendment as if it's somehow sacrosanct. But as anyone can tell you, not all weapons are legal for average Americans to own. I would say that's for good reason. Or as George H. W. Bush (or Dana Carvey) might have said, it wouldn't be prudent.
Just in case you need a reminder, think back to those days of Prohibition when criminals routinely used machine guns in the furtherance of their crimes.
What it proves, of course, is the 2nd Amendment can coexist with limited gun restrictions in the interest of public safety. However, maybe some 2nd Amendment absolutists have a different view and believe that average Americans should be allowed to own fully automatic weapons without the sever restrictions placed on them today.
What say you?
Pay the tax and it is legal to own a fully automatic firearm. I see no need for one, personally, but far be it from me to decide what others need... or want.
Who needs a machine gun?
Anybody who wants onePeople talk about the 2nd Amendment as if it's somehow sacrosanct. But as anyone can tell you, not all weapons are legal for average Americans to own. I would say that's for good reason. Or as George H. W. Bush (or Dana Carvey) might have said, it wouldn't be prudent.
Just in case you need a reminder, think back to those days of Prohibition when criminals routinely used machine guns in the furtherance of their crimes.
What it proves, of course, is the 2nd Amendment can coexist with limited gun restrictions in the interest of public safety. However, maybe some 2nd Amendment absolutists have a different view and believe that average Americans should be allowed to own fully automatic weapons without the sever restrictions placed on them today.
What say you?
Pay the tax and it is legal to own a fully automatic firearm. I see no need for one, personally, but far be it from me to decide what others need... or want.
Who needs a machine gun?
There are two phrases in the Constitution that the left really would love to erase: "free exercise thereof" and "shall not be infringed".Should Machine guns (fully automatic weapons) be legal for average citizens to own?
They already are legal for average citizens to own.
Those who can pay the $200 Federal tax for each transfer, that is.
Some states do put additional restrictions on them.
All unconstitutional, of course.
Who needs fire insurance?Who needs a machine gun?
Why? Are you giving them away?Who needs a machine gun?
Why? Are you giving them away?Who needs a machine gun?
Seriously, I need to know why I have to justify anything to you.
So far I see no need to do so.
Anything else I can help you with?
People talk about the 2nd Amendment as if it's somehow sacrosanct. But as anyone can tell you, not all weapons are legal for average Americans to own. I would say that's for good reason. Or as George H. W. Bush (or Dana Carvey) might have said, it wouldn't be prudent.
Just in case you need a reminder, think back to those days of Prohibition when criminals routinely used machine guns in the furtherance of their crimes.
What it proves, of course, is the 2nd Amendment can coexist with limited gun restrictions in the interest of public safety. However, maybe some 2nd Amendment absolutists have a different view and believe that average Americans should be allowed to own fully automatic weapons without the sever restrictions placed on them today.
What say you?
Who needs midget porn?Who needs a machine gun?
Should Machine guns (fully automatic weapons) be legal for average citizens to own?
They already are legal for average citizens to own.
Those who can pay the $200 Federal tax for each transfer, that is.
Some states do put additional restrictions on them.
All unconstitutional, of course.
People talk about the 2nd Amendment as if it's somehow sacrosanct. But as anyone can tell you, not all weapons are legal for average Americans to own. I would say that's for good reason. Or as George H. W. Bush (or Dana Carvey) might have said, it wouldn't be prudent.
Just in case you need a reminder, think back to those days of Prohibition when criminals routinely used machine guns in the furtherance of their crimes.
What it proves, of course, is the 2nd Amendment can coexist with limited gun restrictions in the interest of public safety. However, maybe some 2nd Amendment absolutists have a different view and believe that average Americans should be allowed to own fully automatic weapons without the sever restrictions placed on them today.
What say you?
People talk about the 2nd Amendment as if it's somehow sacrosanct. But as anyone can tell you, not all weapons are legal for average Americans to own. I would say that's for good reason. Or as George H. W. Bush (or Dana Carvey) might have said, it wouldn't be prudent.
Just in case you need a reminder, think back to those days of Prohibition when criminals routinely used machine guns in the furtherance of their crimes.
What it proves, of course, is the 2nd Amendment can coexist with limited gun restrictions in the interest of public safety. However, maybe some 2nd Amendment absolutists have a different view and believe that average Americans should be allowed to own fully automatic weapons without the sever restrictions placed on them today.
What say you?
Just an answer to the title of your thread:
That isn't up for you or anyone else to decide.
According to the SCOTUS, your version of gun restrictions does not, cannot and will not coexist with the Second Amendment. You can cry all you want about it, but the 2nd is sacrosanct because the courts have said so. Consistently.
There is not one single constitutional right that doesn't have caveats associated with it.
And it's a simple fact that the US Congress could, if it chose to do so, decide to outlaw or restrict, certain firearms, period.
