hjmick
Diamond Member
Beyond any shadow of a doubt.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's what establishment republitards say, too.If Johnson can poll at least 20%, he should be part of the debates. If not, it's stupid to expect that every fringe candidate has a right to participate.
If Johnson can poll at least 20%, he should be part of the debates. If not, it's stupid to expect that every fringe candidate has a right to participate. I believe the American people want to see how the viable candidates handle thinking on their feet.
That's what establishment republitards say, too.If Johnson can poll at least 20%, he should be part of the debates. If not, it's stupid to expect that every fringe candidate has a right to participate.
Nope, not a dime's worth....
They say that, too.That's what establishment republitards say, too.If Johnson can poll at least 20%, he should be part of the debates. If not, it's stupid to expect that every fringe candidate has a right to participate.
Nope, not a dime's worth....
Too bad. Why exactly should fringe candidates be able to participate on an equal footing as viable candidates?
Gary Johnson participated in ONE primary debate. He had the option of appearing in all of them and chose not to. Why would he have anything of importance to add now, when even he felt that he had nothing to add then? I saw Johnson in that debate. I didn't get a soda when he came on the screen. I listened to him and he did not have anything of particular importance to add. He appeared no more knowledgeable than the guy who checks in clothing at the dry cleaners.
If Johnson can poll at least 20%, he should be part of the debates. If not, it's stupid to expect that every fringe candidate has a right to participate. I believe the American people want to see how the viable candidates handle thinking on their feet.
If Johnson were to be included in the debates, he'd be a viable candidate.
What are Obama and Romney afraid of?
They say that, too.That's what establishment republitards say, too.
Nope, not a dime's worth....
Too bad. Why exactly should fringe candidates be able to participate on an equal footing as viable candidates?
You really sure you're not a republican?
Gary Johnson participated in ONE primary debate. He had the option of appearing in all of them and chose not to. Why would he have anything of importance to add now, when even he felt that he had nothing to add then? I saw Johnson in that debate. I didn't get a soda when he came on the screen. I listened to him and he did not have anything of particular importance to add. He appeared no more knowledgeable than the guy who checks in clothing at the dry cleaners.
He was invited to one debate. The rest of the debates he was shut out. It was not a choice he made.
Johnson had a hard time in the primary debates because libertarians preferred Ron Paul. Now since Ron Paul will not be on the ballot, and Johnson WILL be on the ballot in all 50 states PLUS Puerto Rico, he deserves a spot in the presidential debates. Who disagrees with this?
That's what establishment republitards say, too.If Johnson can poll at least 20%, he should be part of the debates. If not, it's stupid to expect that every fringe candidate has a right to participate.
Nope, not a dime's worth....
Too bad. Why exactly should fringe candidates be able to participate on an equal footing as viable candidates?
Johnson had a hard time in the primary debates because libertarians preferred Ron Paul. Now since Ron Paul will not be on the ballot, and Johnson WILL be on the ballot in all 50 states PLUS Puerto Rico, he deserves a spot in the presidential debates. Who disagrees with this?
I do. Where's he polling?
And guess what. He'd hurt Romney a lot worse than he'd hurt Obama. I'm taking a principled stand on this.
No. For one thing, too few people care to hear what Johnson has to say. The only thing he could possibly do is waste time, just like Ron Paul did in the primary debates. Eventually anyone that wanted to hear substance just wished he'd shut up and the debate could move on to those with something to say.
Gary Johnson participated in ONE primary debate. He had the option of appearing in all of them and chose not to. Why would he have anything of importance to add now, when even he felt that he had nothing to add then? I saw Johnson in that debate. I didn't get a soda when he came on the screen. I listened to him and he did not have anything of particular importance to add. He appeared no more knowledgeable than the guy who checks in clothing at the dry cleaners.
Johnson had a hard time in the primary debates because libertarians preferred Ron Paul. Now since Ron Paul will not be on the ballot, and Johnson WILL be on the ballot in all 50 states PLUS Puerto Rico, he deserves a spot in the presidential debates. Who disagrees with this?
I do. Where's he polling?
And guess what. He'd hurt Romney a lot worse than he'd hurt Obama. I'm taking a principled stand on this.