- Apr 10, 2013
- 23,667
- 1,880
- 265
He seems to think he's making a point.
I did. The IRS enforces.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He seems to think he's making a point.
Where did the Pope say that?Well I'll just roll out the elephant in the living room which is the Pope was clear that gay marriage is not allowed for Christians at all. And that the Bible of which the Pope is the messenger boy, strictly forbids any Christian from participation in anything which normalizes homosexuality in a culture.
(Jude 1)
Well I'll just roll out the elephant in the living room which is the Pope was clear that gay marriage is not allowed for Christians at all. And that the Bible of which the Pope is the messenger boy, strictly forbids any Christian from participation in anything which normalizes homosexuality in a culture.
(Jude 1)
Where did the Pope say that?
Well I'll just roll out the elephant in the living room which is the Pope was clear that gay marriage is not allowed for Christians at all. And that the Bible of which the Pope is the messenger boy, strictly forbids any Christian from participation in anything which normalizes homosexuality in a culture.
(Jude 1)Where did the Pope say that?
The film that was shown at the event he was speaking at the town meeting in Philly. The one that even Fox News stopped showing and moved just to the Pope's face and started rattling off hasty statistics filling the time while the film was shown. They did not however cut off in time before they aired on the film the picture of the traditional marriage march in 2013 in Paris France with the pink and blue balloons. Just a snippet of that and wham! their producer intervened and forced the cameras only on the Pope sitting there silently and the commentators rushing weird irrelevant statistics talking over the sound even on the film being shown of traditional marriage only footage the Vatican had approved for the big screen there.
Anybody you work for or take benefits from 'owns' one. Who owns you, dblack?
Anybody you work for or take benefits from 'owns' one. Who owns you, dblack?
Not at all. I can quit a job. Can't quit a government.
Anybody you work for or take benefits from 'owns' one. Who owns you, dblack?
Not at all. I can quit a job. Can't quit a government.
Sure you can- immigration is always an option.
He seems to think he's making a point.
I did. The IRS enforces.
Libertarianism is for the stupid.Anybody you work for or take benefits from 'owns' one. Who owns you, dblack?
Not at all. I can quit a job. Can't quit a government.
Sure you can- immigration is always an option.
No it's not. Not without the permission of government.
It's exactly this - the boneheaded inability to recognize the fundamental difference between voluntary exchange, and coerced compliance - that most threatens liberty in the US.
Anybody you work for or take benefits from 'owns' one. Who owns you, dblack?
Not at all. I can quit a job. Can't quit a government.
Sure you can- immigration is always an option.
No it's not. Not without the permission of government.
It's exactly this - the boneheaded inability to recognize the fundamental difference between voluntary exchange, and coerced compliance - that most threatens liberty in the US.
If that's all ya got, well, thanks for the nod.Libertarianism is for the stupid.Anybody you work for or take benefits from 'owns' one. Who owns you, dblack?
Not at all. I can quit a job. Can't quit a government.
Sure you can- immigration is always an option.
No it's not. Not without the permission of government.
It's exactly this - the boneheaded inability to recognize the fundamental difference between voluntary exchange, and coerced compliance - that most threatens liberty in the US.
All that is needed: it is not a viable ideology.If that's all ya got, well, thanks for the nod.Libertarianism is for the stupid.Anybody you work for or take benefits from 'owns' one. Who owns you, dblack?
Not at all. I can quit a job. Can't quit a government.
Sure you can- immigration is always an option.
No it's not. Not without the permission of government.
It's exactly this - the boneheaded inability to recognize the fundamental difference between voluntary exchange, and coerced compliance - that most threatens liberty in the US.
You have no response to my post, just pretty insults. That's all you ever have fakey. Suck a tailpipe.All that is needed: it is not a viable ideology.If that's all ya got, well, thanks for the nod.Libertarianism is for the stupid.Not at all. I can quit a job. Can't quit a government.
Sure you can- immigration is always an option.
No it's not. Not without the permission of government.
It's exactly this - the boneheaded inability to recognize the fundamental difference between voluntary exchange, and coerced compliance - that most threatens liberty in the US.
No need exists to reply to your post other than note you are a libertarian.You have no response to my post, just pretty insults. That's all you ever have fakey. Suck a tailpipe.All that is needed: it is not a viable ideology.If that's all ya got, well, thanks for the nod.Libertarianism is for the stupid.Sure you can- immigration is always an option.
No it's not. Not without the permission of government.
It's exactly this - the boneheaded inability to recognize the fundamental difference between voluntary exchange, and coerced compliance - that most threatens liberty in the US.
Wow... just the sheer length of this thread. If this doesn't exemplify the colossal divide between Americans on the issue of gay marriage, I don't know what does.
Except this "colossal divide" only exists for a very small minority of Americans. The majority of Americans are in full agreement.Wow... just the sheer length of this thread. If this doesn't exemplify the colossal divide between Americans on the issue of gay marriage, I don't know what does.
Wow... just the sheer length of this thread. If this doesn't exemplify the colossal divide between Americans on the issue of gay marriage, I don't know what does.
Wow... just the sheer length of this thread. If this doesn't exemplify the colossal divide between Americans on the issue of gay marriage, I don't know what does.
Not according to the poll here. The poll here shows of the largest and most popular topic ever at USMB, and the largest poll response ever at USMB, of 233 votes cast, over 80% of them are AT LEAST not supportive of gay marriage if it means making Christians play along. That is to say, they really don't favor gay marriage as "a civil right"...Except this "colossal divide" only exists for a very small minority of Americans. The majority of Americans are in full agreement.
Wow... just the sheer length of this thread. If this doesn't exemplify the colossal divide between Americans on the issue of gay marriage, I don't know what does.
Yes, running 80% against.
Record-High 60% of Americans Support Same-Sex Marriage
Record-High 60% of Americans Support Same-Sex Marriage
Not according to the poll here. The poll here shows of the largest and most popular topic ever at USMB, and the largest poll response ever at USMB, of 233 votes cast, over 80% of them are AT LEAST not supportive of gay marriage if it means making Christians play along. That is to say, they really don't favor gay marriage as "a civil right"...