R.D.
Gold Member
- Feb 7, 2011
- 8,445
- 2,584
- 245
LoLing!
It's rather telling the types of things the radical RWers want to "not rush to judgement" for.
Really - you had to go there??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LoLing!
It's rather telling the types of things the radical RWers want to "not rush to judgement" for.
I think Scott Peterson's case was more closely linked to this one than Susan Smith's. His was mostly circumstantial evidence and he was given the death penalty.
Smith was a basket case. Her serving life is a much more harsh punishment. For all of them really but Peterson and Anthony are so freaking cold hearted about it. Sheesh, Casey Anthony is positively soulless. She doesn't seem to be suffering much right now and Peterson was the same way.
Cost of imprisonment vs. death penalty:
"It is much cheaper to put these people in prison and leave them there until they die. Simple as that."
Average cost to execute in Florida is 3.2 million. If Florida terminated the death penalty it would save 11 million per year.
The High Price of Killing Killers | Death Penalty Information Center
I wish for this trial to be over with and hear the verdict. It's nauseating seeing Casey Anthony sit there like she's all miss innocent and shit. She's a real piece of work is she not?? Try and act like she is the victim here. I don't care what anyone says, I'd like to bitch slap her fucking face into next week.
So why are you watching it?
The only information I'm getting on this case is the snippets from the regular programming I already watch and/or listen to.
Why focus in on such evil?
Here's a random thought. The woman looks kinda guilty. But what if she actually did not intentionally kill the little girl?
Going WAY out on a limb, let's say that the child's death was accidental and then the defendant panicked.
Does that merit a fucking death penalty?
So, to be a Polyanna, I suggest that MAYBE it would be okay to take a wait and see on this one.
I realize it's all radical and shit to expect a liberal to NOT rush to judgment, but let's give the legal presumption of innocence a bit more than mere lip service for a litle while.
The author of the OP is a fucking dork.
Show evidence of *non guilty* peopleIt would be better to wait for the end of her trial,if convicted life in prison.
The death penalty is as stupid as people can get.
Explain yourself.
Think about it, we have killed NON GUILTY people,we are not capable of not screwing up,better to let a 1000 guilty go then convict an innocent.We would be a better society if we didn't do it ever.
If you killed your child by accident, wouldn't you be in mourning instead of going out to the club and entering hot body contests like she did when her daughter was supposedly "missing"?
You bet your life I would.
The defendant may be a psychotic narcissistic twat. I actually "get" the thrust of your question and kind of presume that your instinct about her is pretty accurate.
But that doesn't change the question.
Does anybody deserve a death penalty over an accidental homicide?
If the honest answer to that is "no," then I believe that her hideous narcissism after the accident doesn't change that conclusion. (It just makes us kind of react to her with greater disdain.)
It is actually a good question and I don't know the answer for sure, I don't think we will ever find out for sure if this was an accident or if she did intentionally.
I think if anyone should get the death penalty...it should be her.
Her crime was malicious, viscous and unthinkable.
She purposefully set out to kill her only child, a daughter to continue her carefree lifestyle.
They should throw the book at her.
Something tells me they won't.
What say you?
I say she hasn't been convicted of anything yet.
If OJ can walk, anyone can walk.
Two COMPLETELY different instances.
Let's say that OJ actually committed the crime, which he didn't, it would have been a crime of passion.
What Casey did was planned, she searched on Google for ways on how to kill and dispose of her daughter.
The evidence is crystal clear to see.
Furthermore, she's a MOTHER...who killed her CHILD.
Get it? A MOTHER. Killing her CHILD!
I guess you support child-abuse and child-killings...yes?
Show evidence of *non guilty* peopleExplain yourself.
Think about it, we have killed NON GUILTY people,we are not capable of not screwing up,better to let a 1000 guilty go then convict an innocent.We would be a better society if we didn't do it ever.
that have been executed please if you make a statement like that BACK IT UP
I think if anyone should get the death penalty...it should be her.
Her crime was malicious, viscous and unthinkable.
She purposefully set out to kill her only child, a daughter to continue her carefree lifestyle.
They should throw the book at her.
Something tells me they won't.
What say you?
I think if anyone should get the death penalty...it should be her.
Her crime was malicious, viscous and unthinkable.
She purposefully set out to kill her only child, a daughter to continue her carefree lifestyle.
They should throw the book at her.
Something tells me they won't.
What say you?
Holy Hell by all authority NO. Enough said.
I think if anyone should get the death penalty...it should be her.
Her crime was malicious, viscous and unthinkable.
She purposefully set out to kill her only child, a daughter to continue her carefree lifestyle.
They should throw the book at her.
Something tells me they won't.
What say you?
Holy Hell by all authority NO. Enough said.
I support the juries decision.