Should Blacks Have the Right to Vote?

[MizMolly]

Why would anyone think only male land owners should vote

Because they have a stake in a successful country, unlike those who can vote themselves their neighbor's paycheck.

Women have a stake in a successful country too.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Women have a stake in a successful country too.

Who said they don't

 

[Montrovant]

Why would anyone think only male land owners should vote

Because they have a stake in a successful country, unlike those who can vote themselves their neighbor's paycheck.

People who don't own land have a stake in a successful country as well.

 

[MizMolly]

Women have a stake in a successful country too.

Who said they don't

Just a response to "Because they have a stake in a successful country, unlike those who can vote themselves their neighbor's paycheck."

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

So, do al women have a stake in the country because they are women?

Answer: they dont.

Not sure why you're diverting the topic

 

[ptbw forever]

Should a people who are net takers determine the destiny of a productive First World country?

On net, whites generate a $249.52 billion surplus, or $1,260 per person if you assign 100% of military spending to whites. If you just give whites a proportional share of military spending, their surplus goes up to $553.52 billiontotal and $2,795 per capita.

Blacks, by contrast, run a budget deficit of $389.71 billion, or $10,016 per capita. If 100% of military spending is assigned to whites, blacks STILL run a$306.53 billion deficit, or $7,700 per capita.

Fiscal Impact of Whites, Blacks and Hispanics



.

so white trash shouldn't vote either, lowlife bigot?

True white trash definitely shouldn’t.

 

[ptbw forever]

Should a people who are net takers determine the destiny of a productive First World country?

On net, whites generate a $249.52 billion surplus, or $1,260 per person if you assign 100% of military spending to whites. If you just give whites a proportional share of military spending, their surplus goes up to $553.52 billiontotal and $2,795 per capita.

Blacks, by contrast, run a budget deficit of $389.71 billion, or $10,016 per capita. If 100% of military spending is assigned to whites, blacks STILL run a$306.53 billion deficit, or $7,700 per capita.

Fiscal Impact of Whites, Blacks and Hispanics



.

hey, pondscum:

According to 2013 data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers the program, 40.2 percent of SNAP recipients are white, 25.7 percent are black, 10.3 percent are Hispanic, 2.1 percent are Asian and 1.2 percent are Native American.Feb 28, 2015

Who Gets Food Stamps? White People, Mostly | HuffPost

White people are way underrepresented when it comes to SNAP recipients, while blacks are WAY over-represented.

Dumbasses at Huffington Post don’t understand per capita.

 

[jillian]

Should a people who are net takers determine the destiny of a productive First World country?

On net, whites generate a $249.52 billion surplus, or $1,260 per person if you assign 100% of military spending to whites. If you just give whites a proportional share of military spending, their surplus goes up to $553.52 billiontotal and $2,795 per capita.

Blacks, by contrast, run a budget deficit of $389.71 billion, or $10,016 per capita. If 100% of military spending is assigned to whites, blacks STILL run a$306.53 billion deficit, or $7,700 per capita.

Fiscal Impact of Whites, Blacks and Hispanics



.

hey, pondscum:

According to 2013 data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers the program, 40.2 percent of SNAP recipients are white, 25.7 percent are black, 10.3 percent are Hispanic, 2.1 percent are Asian and 1.2 percent are Native American.Feb 28, 2015

Who Gets Food Stamps? White People, Mostly | HuffPost

White people are way underrepresented when it comes to SNAP recipients, while blacks are WAY over-represented.

Dumbasses at Huffington Post don’t understand per capita.

poor angry little white boy keyboard warrior.

 

[jillian]

Should a people who are net takers determine the destiny of a productive First World country?

On net, whites generate a $249.52 billion surplus, or $1,260 per person if you assign 100% of military spending to whites. If you just give whites a proportional share of military spending, their surplus goes up to $553.52 billiontotal and $2,795 per capita.

Blacks, by contrast, run a budget deficit of $389.71 billion, or $10,016 per capita. If 100% of military spending is assigned to whites, blacks STILL run a$306.53 billion deficit, or $7,700 per capita.

Fiscal Impact of Whites, Blacks and Hispanics



.

so white trash shouldn't vote either, lowlife bigot?

True white trash definitely shouldn’t.

what is "true" white trash but an uneducated angry useless bigot/misogynist?

 

[jillian]

If they are US citizens and registered, they get a vote

Hasn't always been that way. Used to have to be a land owner. Used to be the husband REPRESENTED the FAMILY. The family voted through the father.

According to the information I posted, whites are subsidizing the whole country.

Do you think we should go back to only male land owners having the right to vote?

Why?

I'm sorry, I do not understand the question. Are you asking why I asked Death Angel that question? Are you asking why he might think that only male land owners should have the right to vote?

Why would anyone think only male land owners should vote

because angry little misogynist bigots think that if women and people who rend and don't own vote that only white males will vote.

because they're losers who see their power being usurped

 

[IM2]

Should a people who are net takers determine the destiny of a productive First World country?

On net, whites generate a $249.52 billion surplus, or $1,260 per person if you assign 100% of military spending to whites. If you just give whites a proportional share of military spending, their surplus goes up to $553.52 billiontotal and $2,795 per capita.

Blacks, by contrast, run a budget deficit of $389.71 billion, or $10,016 per capita. If 100% of military spending is assigned to whites, blacks STILL run a$306.53 billion deficit, or $7,700 per capita.

Fiscal Impact of Whites, Blacks and Hispanics



.

If we take a look at the Kellogg Foundation Study called The Business Case for Racial Equity, the Demos study on the Racial Wealth Gap, multiple studies by the Economic Policy Institute, Pew Research and many others we see that racism costs America about 2 trillion dollars annually and that public policy is the cause for things the OP mentions.

Therefore the OP has no merit and is really a topic unworthy of discussion.

 

[MizMolly]

Why should race be a factor in voting rights?

 

[Hellbilly]

No

Why not?

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

 

[Tommy Tainant]

There are some crazy fucks on this site.

 

[Toro]

Only people with a high net worth and advanced degrees should be allowed to vote.

Poor uneducated rubes should not be allowed to vote.

 

[Hellbilly]

Only people with a high net worth and advanced degrees should be allowed to vote.

Poor uneducated rubes should not be allowed to vote.

The Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the federal and state governments from denying a citizen the right to vote based on that citizen's "race, color, or previous condition of servitude".

You lose.

Sent from my SM-J727VPP using Tapatalk

 

[sealybobo]

Should a people who are net takers determine the destiny of a productive First World country?

On net, whites generate a $249.52 billion surplus, or $1,260 per person if you assign 100% of military spending to whites. If you just give whites a proportional share of military spending, their surplus goes up to $553.52 billiontotal and $2,795 per capita.

Blacks, by contrast, run a budget deficit of $389.71 billion, or $10,016 per capita. If 100% of military spending is assigned to whites, blacks STILL run a$306.53 billion deficit, or $7,700 per capita.

Fiscal Impact of Whites, Blacks and Hispanics



.

In essence you mean all poor people not just black people, right?

Even if you mean all poor people you are wrong. Why should poor people not have a say? If they don’t they are screwed because of voters like you.

One reason their life sucks is because 80% of them don’t vote. So we see the results of them not voting. For the rich it’s good for the poor its bad.

Poor people have the power to raise their wages and get affordable healthcare. All they have to do is vote.

They have the power to raise your taxes. I wish they would. They just have to vote.

And you can cry class warfare all you want. Won’t do you any good

 

[Tommy Tainant]

`
Yes. Look at it this way, at least in Wisconsin, many can't vote because of their prison record.
`

The UK govt has clashed with the EU over voting rights for prisoners. The EU says yes the UK says no.It seems like a double punishment to me.

 

[undertherqadar]

Should a people who are net takers determine the destiny of a productive First World country?

On net, whites generate a $249.52 billion surplus, or $1,260 per person if you assign 100% of military spending to whites. If you just give whites a proportional share of military spending, their surplus goes up to $553.52 billiontotal and $2,795 per capita.

Blacks, by contrast, run a budget deficit of $389.71 billion, or $10,016 per capita. If 100% of military spending is assigned to whites, blacks STILL run a$306.53 billion deficit, or $7,700 per capita.

Fiscal Impact of Whites, Blacks and Hispanics



.

hey, pondscum:

According to 2013 data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers the program, 40.2 percent of SNAP recipients are white, 25.7 percent are black, 10.3 percent are Hispanic, 2.1 percent are Asian and 1.2 percent are Native American.Feb 28, 2015




Who Gets Food Stamps? White People, Mostly | HuffPost

The Food Stamp Capital of the U.S. is WHITE and REPUBLICAN

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

In essence you mean all poor people not just black people, right?

My question was clear..
Whites, as a group (and probably Orientals), are the ONLY people who positively impact the national Treasury. All other groups are net TAKERS from whites.