Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That is rather silly and naïve an assertion.Most civilized societies are abandoning Christianity.I can see a rationale for declaring atheism or the expressive of immoral and degenerate atheistic beliefs in public places an offense against the state, the public, and our common standards of decency.
Given the interrelation between anti-intellectual atheistic filth, and the moral and ethical vices and degeneracies it promotes and spreads, like a moral plague of sorts - justifying aberrant practices such as rape, murder, child molestation, pornography addiction, anti-intellectualism and cultural philistinism of sorts, not only an offense against God or the Supreme Being, but against society, our Common Law, and its religious principles and morals upon which it is founded and developed, such as the Golden Rule, respect for human's individuality, property, autonomy, family, and so forth.
Since atheists and other intellectual and moral degenerates renounce these things, favoring the moral nihilism and hedonism of evildoers like De Sade and Stirner, I'd argue that the very existence of an atheist, bold and damned enough to express his filty and immoral views and obesity in the public eye, is an offense in and of itself, and no state nor nation which values its own vitality, morality, decency, and power would have any reason to tolerate them at all.
In every 1st world nation, openly identifying as an atheist might very well be made as socially and morally repugnant and unacceptable as openly identifying as a pedophile, a rapist, a Nazi, a racist or racial supremacist, a terrorist.
Merely allowing an atheist to live at all, yet alone have the gall to spread his filth in the vicinity of morally superior men, women and children is more than he arguably even deserves, and more than many nations, past and present, would afford him - by the virtue of his atheism and depravity, he or she more or less renounces his humanity, his claims or factious "right" to even be considered "human" at all by superior members of society, rather being more akin to a feral and odious beast, to be tamed, scurried, shamed, and forced into the bare minimum of socially acceptable standards and behavior which otherwise would not differentiate him and his ilk from any other rapid and postulant beast, debatedly more worthy of being shot or hunted, than allowed to remain alive at all, at the expense of the oxygen of society's betters, let alone God or the Supreme Being itself.
One who claims to be an atheist, yet isn't raping, murdering, tormenting children, simply isn't very good at being one, whereas the opposite of course could be said of a Christian, a Buddhist, or even a Muslim, making one wonder if an atheist should be held on level of contempt beneath even that of an Islamist terrorist, and that the common despisement of such by everyone from good Christian men and women, Buddhist monks, and even said Islamic terrorists, is proof of their ultimate moral worthlessness in the cosmos, akin to feces, maggots, or bacteria in need of sanitation and desposal, more so than anything worth being called "life" to begin with in the hierarchy of God.
Christianity is now becoming a crutch for poorly educated Third World Nations
Aren't you a Papist? Catholic clergy rape children like it's a right of passage. Muslims in many part of the world marry and rape children as common practice as well.If I could get rid of rape, or get rid of atheism, I'd get rid of atheism, and doing so would likely eliminate rape consequentially; it merely being the practice and natural behavior of atheism
Knowing you, I imagine you prefer rapeIf I could get rid of rape, or get rid of atheism, I'd get rid of atheism, and doing so would likely eliminate rape consequentially; it merely being the practice and natural behavior of atheism.Troll much?I can see a rationale for declaring atheism or the expressive of immoral and degenerate atheistic beliefs in public places an offense against the state, the public, and our common standards of decency.
Given the interrelation between anti-intellectual atheistic filth, and the moral and ethical vices and degeneracies it promotes and spreads, like a moral plague of sorts - justifying aberrant practices such as rape, murder, child molestation, pornography addiction, anti-intellectualism and cultural philistinism of sorts, not only an offense against God or the Supreme Being, but against society, our Common Law, and its religious principles and morals upon which it is founded and developed, such as the Golden Rule, respect for human's individuality, property, autonomy, family, and so forth.
Since atheists and other intellectual and moral degenerates renounce these things, favoring the moral nihilism and hedonism of evildoers like De Sade and Stirner, I'd argue that the very existence of an atheist, bold and damned enough to express his filty and immoral views and obesity in the public eye, is an offense in and of itself, and no state nor nation which values its own vitality, morality, decency, and power would have any reason to tolerate them at all.
In every 1st world nation, openly identifying as an atheist might very well be made as socially and morally repugnant and unacceptable as openly identifying as a pedophile, a rapist, a Nazi, a racist or racial supremacist, a terrorist.
Merely allowing an atheist to live at all, yet alone have the gall to spread his filth in the vicinity of morally superior men, women and children is more than he arguably even deserves, and more than many nations, past and present, would afford him - by the virtue of his atheism and depravity, he or she more or less renounces his humanity, his claims or factious "right" to even be considered "human" at all by superior members of society, rather being more akin to a feral and odious beast, to be tamed, scurried, shamed, and forced into the bare minimum of socially acceptable standards and behavior which otherwise would not differentiate him and his ilk from any other rapid and postulant beast, debatedly more worthy of being shot or hunted, than allowed to remain alive at all, at the expense of the oxygen of society's betters, let alone God or the Supreme Being itself.
One who claims to be an atheist, yet isn't raping, murdering, tormenting children, simply isn't very good at being one, whereas the opposite of course could be said of a Christian, a Buddhist, or even a Muslim, making one wonder if an atheist should be held on level of contempt beneath even that of an Islamist terrorist, and that the common despisement of such by everyone from good Christian men and women, Buddhist monks, and even said Islamic terrorists, is proof of their ultimate moral worthlessness in the cosmos, akin to feces, maggots, or bacteria in need of sanitation and desposal, more so than anything worth being called "life" to begin with in the hierarchy of God.
No atheist can justify not being a rapist without appealing to religious values and principles to begin with, such as the Golden Rule and our Common Law system, which developed from older legal and religious systems to begin with.
That is rather silly and naïve an assertion.Most civilized societies are abandoning Christianity.I can see a rationale for declaring atheism or the expressive of immoral and degenerate atheistic beliefs in public places an offense against the state, the public, and our common standards of decency.
Given the interrelation between anti-intellectual atheistic filth, and the moral and ethical vices and degeneracies it promotes and spreads, like a moral plague of sorts - justifying aberrant practices such as rape, murder, child molestation, pornography addiction, anti-intellectualism and cultural philistinism of sorts, not only an offense against God or the Supreme Being, but against society, our Common Law, and its religious principles and morals upon which it is founded and developed, such as the Golden Rule, respect for human's individuality, property, autonomy, family, and so forth.
Since atheists and other intellectual and moral degenerates renounce these things, favoring the moral nihilism and hedonism of evildoers like De Sade and Stirner, I'd argue that the very existence of an atheist, bold and damned enough to express his filty and immoral views and obesity in the public eye, is an offense in and of itself, and no state nor nation which values its own vitality, morality, decency, and power would have any reason to tolerate them at all.
In every 1st world nation, openly identifying as an atheist might very well be made as socially and morally repugnant and unacceptable as openly identifying as a pedophile, a rapist, a Nazi, a racist or racial supremacist, a terrorist.
Merely allowing an atheist to live at all, yet alone have the gall to spread his filth in the vicinity of morally superior men, women and children is more than he arguably even deserves, and more than many nations, past and present, would afford him - by the virtue of his atheism and depravity, he or she more or less renounces his humanity, his claims or factious "right" to even be considered "human" at all by superior members of society, rather being more akin to a feral and odious beast, to be tamed, scurried, shamed, and forced into the bare minimum of socially acceptable standards and behavior which otherwise would not differentiate him and his ilk from any other rapid and postulant beast, debatedly more worthy of being shot or hunted, than allowed to remain alive at all, at the expense of the oxygen of society's betters, let alone God or the Supreme Being itself.
One who claims to be an atheist, yet isn't raping, murdering, tormenting children, simply isn't very good at being one, whereas the opposite of course could be said of a Christian, a Buddhist, or even a Muslim, making one wonder if an atheist should be held on level of contempt beneath even that of an Islamist terrorist, and that the common despisement of such by everyone from good Christian men and women, Buddhist monks, and even said Islamic terrorists, is proof of their ultimate moral worthlessness in the cosmos, akin to feces, maggots, or bacteria in need of sanitation and desposal, more so than anything worth being called "life" to begin with in the hierarchy of God.
Christianity is now becoming a crutch for poorly educated Third World Nations
It's certainly not the more civilized aspects of said societies which are abandoning it; you'd have to abandon the entire Common Law system and its development from older systems, including religious ones, and I don't see that happening anytime soon, no.
As per the predictions I've seen, it is atheism which naturally and rightfully seems to be dying worldwide.
Eventually the false dictomy between "politics" and "religion" should merely be abolished, and religious and moral tests made requirements for holding office.No Evangelicals should not be allowed to be in politics or be street preachers.
The Framers and many of their archaic axioms, being a product of that rather old little intellectual movement known as the enlightenment, so often overrated and superstitiously revered - are relics from an archaic day and age, and thankfully they aren't idols to be worship, so of course we can simply amend or change our systems of government and Construction, into something specifically religious and moral.
Christ was looked up to by the Founders themselves; even during the days of ancient Rome, he was ahead of them, and his time, and would have made a far better statemen than any of them, a perfect candidate for a benevolent theocrat if there ever was one.
Looking at all the terrible things that have been done in the names of various gods I think a better argument can be made for outlawing the practice of any organized religion.I can see a rationale for declaring atheism or the expressive of immoral and degenerate atheistic beliefs in public places an offense against the state, the public, and our common standards of decency.
Given the interrelation between anti-intellectual atheistic filth, and the moral and ethical vices and degeneracies it promotes and spreads, like a moral plague of sorts - justifying aberrant practices such as rape, murder, child molestation, pornography addiction, anti-intellectualism and cultural philistinism of sorts, not only an offense against God or the Supreme Being, but against society, our Common Law, and its religious principles and morals upon which it is founded and developed, such as the Golden Rule, respect for human's individuality, property, autonomy, family, and so forth.
Since atheists and other intellectual and moral degenerates renounce these things, favoring the moral nihilism and hedonism of evildoers like De Sade and Stirner, I'd argue that the very existence of an atheist, bold and damned enough to express his filty and immoral views and obesity in the public eye, is an offense in and of itself, and no state nor nation which values its own vitality, morality, decency, and power would have any reason to tolerate them at all.
In every 1st world nation, openly identifying as an atheist might very well be made as socially and morally repugnant and unacceptable as openly identifying as a pedophile, a rapist, a Nazi, a racist or racial supremacist, a terrorist.
Merely allowing an atheist to live at all, yet alone have the gall to spread his filth in the vicinity of morally superior men, women and children is more than he arguably even deserves, and more than many nations, past and present, would afford him - by the virtue of his atheism and depravity, he or she more or less renounces his humanity, his claims or factious "right" to even be considered "human" at all by superior members of society, rather being more akin to a feral and odious beast, to be tamed, scurried, shamed, and forced into the bare minimum of socially acceptable standards and behavior which otherwise would not differentiate him and his ilk from any other rapid and postulant beast, debatedly more worthy of being shot or hunted, than allowed to remain alive at all, at the expense of the oxygen of society's betters, let alone God or the Supreme Being itself.
One who claims to be an atheist, yet isn't raping, murdering, tormenting children, simply isn't very good at being one, whereas the opposite of course could be said of a Christian, a Buddhist, or even a Muslim, making one wonder if an atheist should be held on level of contempt beneath even that of an Islamist terrorist, and that the common despisement of such by everyone from good Christian men and women, Buddhist monks, and even said Islamic terrorists, is proof of their ultimate moral worthlessness in the cosmos, akin to feces, maggots, or bacteria in need of sanitation and desposal, more so than anything worth being called "life" to begin with in the hierarchy of God.
I didn't have to read the top post either. Answer: No. C'mon man.Didn't have top read the post. Answer: Yes
If I could get rid of rape, or get rid of atheism, I'd get rid of atheism, and doing so would likely eliminate rape consequentially; it merely being the practice and natural behavior of atheism.Troll much?I can see a rationale for declaring atheism or the expressive of immoral and degenerate atheistic beliefs in public places an offense against the state, the public, and our common standards of decency.
Given the interrelation between anti-intellectual atheistic filth, and the moral and ethical vices and degeneracies it promotes and spreads, like a moral plague of sorts - justifying aberrant practices such as rape, murder, child molestation, pornography addiction, anti-intellectualism and cultural philistinism of sorts, not only an offense against God or the Supreme Being, but against society, our Common Law, and its religious principles and morals upon which it is founded and developed, such as the Golden Rule, respect for human's individuality, property, autonomy, family, and so forth.
Since atheists and other intellectual and moral degenerates renounce these things, favoring the moral nihilism and hedonism of evildoers like De Sade and Stirner, I'd argue that the very existence of an atheist, bold and damned enough to express his filty and immoral views and obesity in the public eye, is an offense in and of itself, and no state nor nation which values its own vitality, morality, decency, and power would have any reason to tolerate them at all.
In every 1st world nation, openly identifying as an atheist might very well be made as socially and morally repugnant and unacceptable as openly identifying as a pedophile, a rapist, a Nazi, a racist or racial supremacist, a terrorist.
Merely allowing an atheist to live at all, yet alone have the gall to spread his filth in the vicinity of morally superior men, women and children is more than he arguably even deserves, and more than many nations, past and present, would afford him - by the virtue of his atheism and depravity, he or she more or less renounces his humanity, his claims or factious "right" to even be considered "human" at all by superior members of society, rather being more akin to a feral and odious beast, to be tamed, scurried, shamed, and forced into the bare minimum of socially acceptable standards and behavior which otherwise would not differentiate him and his ilk from any other rapid and postulant beast, debatedly more worthy of being shot or hunted, than allowed to remain alive at all, at the expense of the oxygen of society's betters, let alone God or the Supreme Being itself.
One who claims to be an atheist, yet isn't raping, murdering, tormenting children, simply isn't very good at being one, whereas the opposite of course could be said of a Christian, a Buddhist, or even a Muslim, making one wonder if an atheist should be held on level of contempt beneath even that of an Islamist terrorist, and that the common despisement of such by everyone from good Christian men and women, Buddhist monks, and even said Islamic terrorists, is proof of their ultimate moral worthlessness in the cosmos, akin to feces, maggots, or bacteria in need of sanitation and desposal, more so than anything worth being called "life" to begin with in the hierarchy of God.
No atheist can justify not being a rapist without appealing to religious values and principles to begin with, such as the Golden Rule and our Common Law system, which developed from older legal and religious systems to begin with.
Beautifully written. I do not make exceptions for my distaste for rapists, murderers, and child molesters, just because they are not doing any of these things at the moment. Everytime I have contact with a known atheist or see a public square where all religious symbols have been spiteful removed or banned, I am being forced to see symbols of the atheism faith. I am tired of having the commie state religion in my face.I can see a rationale for declaring atheism or the expressive of immoral and degenerate atheistic beliefs in public places an offense against the state, the public, and our common standards of decency.
Given the interrelation between anti-intellectual atheistic filth, and the moral and ethical vices and degeneracies it promotes and spreads, like a moral plague of sorts - justifying aberrant practices such as rape, murder, child molestation, pornography addiction, anti-intellectualism and cultural philistinism of sorts, not only an offense against God or the Supreme Being, but against society, our Common Law, and its religious principles and morals upon which it is founded and developed, such as the Golden Rule, respect for human's individuality, property, autonomy, family, and so forth.
Since atheists and other intellectual and moral degenerates renounce these things, favoring the moral nihilism and hedonism of evildoers like De Sade and Stirner, I'd argue that the very existence of an atheist, bold and damned enough to express his filty and immoral views and obesity in the public eye, is an offense in and of itself, and no state nor nation which values its own vitality, morality, decency, and power would have any reason to tolerate them at all.
In every 1st world nation, openly identifying as an atheist might very well be made as socially and morally repugnant and unacceptable as openly identifying as a pedophile, a rapist, a Nazi, a racist or racial supremacist, a terrorist.
Merely allowing an atheist to live at all, yet alone have the gall to spread his filth in the vicinity of morally superior men, women and children is more than he arguably even deserves, and more than many nations, past and present, would afford him - by the virtue of his atheism and depravity, he or she more or less renounces his humanity, his claims or factious "right" to even be considered "human" at all by superior members of society, rather being more akin to a feral and odious beast, to be tamed, scurried, shamed, and forced into the bare minimum of socially acceptable standards and behavior which otherwise would not differentiate him and his ilk from any other rapid and postulant beast, debatedly more worthy of being shot or hunted, than allowed to remain alive at all, at the expense of the oxygen of society's betters, let alone God or the Supreme Being itself.
One who claims to be an atheist, yet isn't raping, murdering, tormenting children, simply isn't very good at being one, whereas the opposite of course could be said of a Christian, a Buddhist, or even a Muslim, making one wonder if an atheist should be held on level of contempt beneath even that of an Islamist terrorist, and that the common despisement of such by everyone from good Christian men and women, Buddhist monks, and even said Islamic terrorists, is proof of their ultimate moral worthlessness in the cosmos, akin to feces, maggots, or bacteria in need of sanitation and desposal, more so than anything worth being called "life" to begin with in the hierarchy of God.
Omg, this is spot on.I have barely if any "human" respect for atheists whatsoever, and am tempted to believe that by the virtue of their own worthlessness and nihilism they don't deserve any "rights" at all, human, animal, or otherwise, no more rights than a plague in need of sanitation.Didn't have top read the post. Answer: Yes
The religious, moral, spiritual, and virtuous are inherently superior to atheists, some as high above an atheist as mankind itself is above the apes, and there is no reason we should give them the pretense of equality at all, only men and women of God should be held to be equal, atheists, no more equal than slaves or chattle, with is all their worthless, nihilism, and moral degeneracy is good for.
If there is a new group to be made in the deplorables of civilized societies in America and the West, it should be atheists and their cancerous, verminous, morally infectious and contageous ilk.
Most civilized societies are abandoning Christianity.
Christianity is now becoming a crutch for poorly educated Third World Nations
Most civilized societies are abandoning Christianity.
Christianity is now becoming a crutch for poorly educated Third World Nations
These are oxymorons.
Those were oxymorons. Nice evasion though.Most civilized societies are abandoning Christianity.
Christianity is now becoming a crutch for poorly educated Third World Nations
These are oxymorons.
Nothing wrong with that
If you still believe in Christianity and everyone else is abandoning it, you can still go on.
Just because educated people are abandoning Christianity is no reason you should
Should atheists be allowed to express their beliefs (or lack thereof) in public?
HardlyThose were oxymorons. Nice evasion though.Most civilized societies are abandoning Christianity.
Christianity is now becoming a crutch for poorly educated Third World Nations
These are oxymorons.
Nothing wrong with that
If you still believe in Christianity and everyone else is abandoning it, you can still go on.
Just because educated people are abandoning Christianity is no reason you should
Those were oxymoronsHardlyThose were oxymorons. Nice evasion though.Most civilized societies are abandoning Christianity.
Christianity is now becoming a crutch for poorly educated Third World Nations
These are oxymorons.
Nothing wrong with that
If you still believe in Christianity and everyone else is abandoning it, you can still go on.
Just because educated people are abandoning Christianity is no reason you should
You keep saying that wordThose were oxymoronsHardlyThose were oxymorons. Nice evasion though.Most civilized societies are abandoning Christianity.
Christianity is now becoming a crutch for poorly educated Third World Nations
These are oxymorons.
Nothing wrong with that
If you still believe in Christianity and everyone else is abandoning it, you can still go on.
Just because educated people are abandoning Christianity is no reason you should
Again, you're an idiot, the Common Law system in America and Britian is a "religious" system, developed from older legal systems and incorporating religious principles and "Christian" ones such as the "Golden Rule" as the foundations of modern societies and civilization.That is rather silly and naïve an assertion.Most civilized societies are abandoning Christianity.I can see a rationale for declaring atheism or the expressive of immoral and degenerate atheistic beliefs in public places an offense against the state, the public, and our common standards of decency.
Given the interrelation between anti-intellectual atheistic filth, and the moral and ethical vices and degeneracies it promotes and spreads, like a moral plague of sorts - justifying aberrant practices such as rape, murder, child molestation, pornography addiction, anti-intellectualism and cultural philistinism of sorts, not only an offense against God or the Supreme Being, but against society, our Common Law, and its religious principles and morals upon which it is founded and developed, such as the Golden Rule, respect for human's individuality, property, autonomy, family, and so forth.
Since atheists and other intellectual and moral degenerates renounce these things, favoring the moral nihilism and hedonism of evildoers like De Sade and Stirner, I'd argue that the very existence of an atheist, bold and damned enough to express his filty and immoral views and obesity in the public eye, is an offense in and of itself, and no state nor nation which values its own vitality, morality, decency, and power would have any reason to tolerate them at all.
In every 1st world nation, openly identifying as an atheist might very well be made as socially and morally repugnant and unacceptable as openly identifying as a pedophile, a rapist, a Nazi, a racist or racial supremacist, a terrorist.
Merely allowing an atheist to live at all, yet alone have the gall to spread his filth in the vicinity of morally superior men, women and children is more than he arguably even deserves, and more than many nations, past and present, would afford him - by the virtue of his atheism and depravity, he or she more or less renounces his humanity, his claims or factious "right" to even be considered "human" at all by superior members of society, rather being more akin to a feral and odious beast, to be tamed, scurried, shamed, and forced into the bare minimum of socially acceptable standards and behavior which otherwise would not differentiate him and his ilk from any other rapid and postulant beast, debatedly more worthy of being shot or hunted, than allowed to remain alive at all, at the expense of the oxygen of society's betters, let alone God or the Supreme Being itself.
One who claims to be an atheist, yet isn't raping, murdering, tormenting children, simply isn't very good at being one, whereas the opposite of course could be said of a Christian, a Buddhist, or even a Muslim, making one wonder if an atheist should be held on level of contempt beneath even that of an Islamist terrorist, and that the common despisement of such by everyone from good Christian men and women, Buddhist monks, and even said Islamic terrorists, is proof of their ultimate moral worthlessness in the cosmos, akin to feces, maggots, or bacteria in need of sanitation and desposal, more so than anything worth being called "life" to begin with in the hierarchy of God.
Christianity is now becoming a crutch for poorly educated Third World Nations
It's certainly not the more civilized aspects of said societies which are abandoning it; you'd have to abandon the entire Common Law system and its development from older systems, including religious ones, and I don't see that happening anytime soon, no.
As per the predictions I've seen, it is atheism which naturally and rightfully seems to be dying worldwide.
Organized religion is a thing of the past in Europe
In the United States, young people are abandoning the faith of their parents
As people become more educated, embracing religion becomes unnecessary
But don’t get discouraged. Your Christian beliefs are still going strong in uneducated regions of Africa and South America
