Sheriff in Florida shooting calls for power to detain over social media

Dont Taz Me Bro

Diamond Member
Staff member
Senior USMB Moderator
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Nov 17, 2009
69,193
36,716
2,645
Las Vegas, Nevada
Amidst the ever predictable knee jerk cries for gun control by the left and screams from the right for armed teachers and metal detectors in schools, everyone is glossing over the real problem here and that is the failure of our mental health system. While I agree that authorities need more leeway in involuntarily detaining people for observation, it needs to be done carefully in order to protect our civil rights.

There couldn't have been any more warning signs with Nikolas Cruz. The police had been to his house 39 times over a seven year period. The FBI was made aware of his threats to shoot up a school and nothing was done despite all of this because up until he actually carried out his threat, no crime had been committed. In obvious cases like Cruz, we need to allow authorities more power to take these people into custody and have them evaluated by a doctor for a week or longer, what ever is necessary to determine if they really are a threat. Instead, these people get pumped up with cocktails of anti-depressants and psychotropic drugs and are dumped back out onto the streets where they can and sometimes do end up hurting a lot of people. However, given our present day society where people get offended by and overreact to every little thing we have to be cautious to also not start witch hunts, dragging innocent people off the streets over surly, off the cuff remarks that are clearly intended as hyperbole. How many times have we all said, "Oh, I'd like to kill that person!" but we aren't really going to do it.

This coupled with the fact that American society in general has been slowly decaying over the last few decades, it's time we start addressing the disease instead of wanting to treat the symptoms. Guns are not the disease. Burdening over 99% of the gun owners in this country due to the heinous actions of less than 1% are not going to solve this problem. Gun control didn't stop the Bataclan Massacre in Paris in 2015 where 130 people were slaughtered with illegal automatic weapons nor did it stop the Charlie Hebdo attacks in the same city. It didn't stop Anders Breivik from gunning down and murdering 77 people in Norway in 2011. It didn't stop machete wielding terrorists from slicing and dicing over 100 people at a train station in Kunming, China in 2014. And while gun control advocates like to point to Britain and Australia as models of success, their murder rates have gone up at times and gone down at times after their gun bans were passed. Less people may have been killed by firearms, but at times more people were actually being murdered than before and at other times less, indicating it really made little difference. Dead is dead regardless of how you get that way.

Conversely, the conservative solution isn't exactly desirable either. Nothing says "Land of the Free" like metal detectors along with teachers and police carrying guns in every school across the country, right? Do you really want to be raising your children in a Soviet style police state? What kind of small government is that, exactly?

Unfortunately, it seems partisans on both sides are more interested in fingerpointing and demonizing the opposition while also pushing knee jerk solutions based on pure emotion that won't have any affect other than to burden the vast majority of the populace who aren't the threat. Hence, as always, I don't see much coming of this latest incident, but one must wonder how many more events like this we are willing to tolerate until Americans want to honestly address this problem.

Florida sheriff calls for more power to detain people after school shooting
 
The FBI was not made aware of his threats, that is incorrect. Specifically, who he was, where he lived, what school he intended act on.

One single response post on youtube with a name matching his -- no way to trace it back to him specifically.

Even if Youtube has the IP address of the person who posted the single response, there were no specifics about which school, location, etc. -- FBI threat assessment criteria for medium or high risk was not even close to met.

Local police should develop their own Threat Assessment standards and be allowed to present evidence to judges who can issue an order of protection that includes removing guns from the home TEMPORARILY until the suspect is evaluated by a court appointed mental health professional and given his day in court.

With any removal of weapons the full-on gun nuts are going to scream bloody murder. These people are so far gone, it's not even worth explaining how many levels of checks and balances are involved with a judge issuing a warrant. But a very specific criteria should be developed first -- something then general public will all agree "Yeah, get those fucking guns outta that boy's house."

Killing or torture of animals
assaulting family members
verbal threats
online threats
computer drive with violent material
stocking behavior
taking an interest in other mass killings. (Adam Lanza had a detailed spread sheet of mass killings)

Make sure local normal people understand that the standard is high, reasonable, based on profiles.


Anton Scalia "I'm an originalist and a textualist, not a nut."

Only a nut would believe, knowing what we find out after the event, these peoples rights come ahead of public safety. Screw the nuts.
 
Scott Israel has always been very outspoken on his opinion that American citizens do not need to be armed.....

Quote.....
"That's what the Police are here for"

It surprises noone that knows him that he has no problem with a Police State.

Oh, you better believe HE has guns at HIS home to protect HIS family. Your families protection?.....Meh....dial 911
 
Last edited:
The FBI was not made aware of his threats, that is incorrect. Specifically, who he was, where he lived, what school he intended act on.

One single response post on youtube with a name matching his -- no way to trace it back to him specifically.

Even if Youtube has the IP address of the person who posted the single response, there were no specifics about which school, location, etc. -- FBI threat assessment criteria for medium or high risk was not even close to met.

Local police should develop their own Threat Assessment standards and be allowed to present evidence to judges who can issue an order of protection that includes removing guns from the home TEMPORARILY until the suspect is evaluated by a court appointed mental health professional and given his day in court.

With any removal of weapons the full-on gun nuts are going to scream bloody murder. These people are so far gone, it's not even worth explaining how many levels of checks and balances are involved with a judge issuing a warrant. But a very specific criteria should be developed first -- something then general public will all agree "Yeah, get those fucking guns outta that boy's house."

Killing or torture of animals
assaulting family members
verbal threats
online threats
computer drive with violent material
stocking behavior
taking an interest in other mass killings. (Adam Lanza had a detailed spread sheet of mass killings)

Make sure local normal people understand that the standard is high, reasonable, based on profiles.


Anton Scalia "I'm an originalist and a textualist, not a nut."

Only a nut would believe, knowing what we find out after the event, these peoples rights come ahead of public safety. Screw the nuts.

Assaulting family members: why only family members? If two cousins get into a fight, would you have them lose their right to bear arms? Are you at least limiting this idea to assault convictions?

Computer drive with violent material: wow, that's vague. Violent material could mean almost anything. Also, how are authorities supposed to know what materials someone has on their computer hard drive?

Stocking behavior: what? Are you talking about people celebrating Christmas? The guy putting items on grocery store shelves at 2 in the morning? I'm not sure what stocking behavior means.

Taking an interest in other mass killings: another vague one. What constitutes taking an interest? If someone does a report for a class on mass killings, does that lead to that person losing their right to bear arms?
 
Amidst the ever predictable knee jerk cries for gun control by the left and screams from the right for armed teachers and metal detectors in schools, everyone is glossing over the real problem here and that is the failure of our mental health system. While I agree that authorities need more leeway in involuntarily detaining people for observation, it needs to be done carefully in order to protect our civil rights.

There couldn't have been any more warning signs with Nikolas Cruz. The police had been to his house 39 times over a seven year period. The FBI was made aware of his threats to shoot up a school and nothing was done despite all of this because up until he actually carried out his threat, no crime had been committed. In obvious cases like Cruz, we need to allow authorities more power to take these people into custody and have them evaluated by a doctor for a week or longer, what ever is necessary to determine if they really are a threat. Instead, these people get pumped up with cocktails of anti-depressants and psychotropic drugs and are dumped back out onto the streets where they can and sometimes do end up hurting a lot of people. However, given our present day society where people get offended by and overreact to every little thing we have to be cautious to also not start witch hunts, dragging innocent people off the streets over surly, off the cuff remarks that are clearly intended as hyperbole. How many times have we all said, "Oh, I'd like to kill that person!" but we aren't really going to do it.

This coupled with the fact that American society in general has been slowly decaying over the last few decades, it's time we start addressing the disease instead of wanting to treat the symptoms. Guns are not the disease. Burdening over 99% of the gun owners in this country due to the heinous actions of less than 1% are not going to solve this problem. Gun control didn't stop the Bataclan Massacre in Paris in 2015 where 130 people were slaughtered with illegal automatic weapons nor did it stop the Charlie Hebdo attacks in the same city. It didn't stop Anders Breivik from gunning down and murdering 77 people in Norway in 2011. It didn't stop machete wielding terrorists from slicing and dicing over 100 people at a train station in Kunming, China in 2014. And while gun control advocates like to point to Britain and Australia as models of success, their murder rates have gone up at times and gone down at times after their gun bans were passed. Less people may have been killed by firearms, but at times more people were actually being murdered than before and at other times less, indicating it really made little difference. Dead is dead regardless of how you get that way.

Conversely, the conservative solution isn't exactly desirable either. Nothing says "Land of the Free" like metal detectors along with teachers and police carrying guns in every school across the country, right? Do you really want to be raising your children in a Soviet style police state? What kind of small government is that, exactly?

Unfortunately, it seems partisans on both sides are more interested in fingerpointing and demonizing the opposition while also pushing knee jerk solutions based on pure emotion that won't have any affect other than to burden the vast majority of the populace who aren't the threat. Hence, as always, I don't see much coming of this latest incident, but one must wonder how many more events like this we are willing to tolerate until Americans want to honestly address this problem.

Florida sheriff calls for more power to detain people after school shooting

Is it really that hard to Baker Act someone in Florida? I didn't think it was all that difficult. I'm not sure that having the authority was the issue in this situation.
 
Actually they were by the last tip they received, from someone that knew him.
The FBI was not made aware of his threats, that is incorrect. Specifically, who he was, where he lived, what school he intended act on.

One single response post on youtube with a name matching his -- no way to trace it back to him specifically.

Even if Youtube has the IP address of the person who posted the single response, there were no specifics about which school, location, etc. -- FBI threat assessment criteria for medium or high risk was not even close to met.

Local police should develop their own Threat Assessment standards and be allowed to present evidence to judges who can issue an order of protection that includes removing guns from the home TEMPORARILY until the suspect is evaluated by a court appointed mental health professional and given his day in court.

With any removal of weapons the full-on gun nuts are going to scream bloody murder. These people are so far gone, it's not even worth explaining how many levels of checks and balances are involved with a judge issuing a warrant. But a very specific criteria should be developed first -- something then general public will all agree "Yeah, get those fucking guns outta that boy's house."

Killing or torture of animals
assaulting family members
verbal threats
online threats
computer drive with violent material
stocking behavior
taking an interest in other mass killings. (Adam Lanza had a detailed spread sheet of mass killings)

Make sure local normal people understand that the standard is high, reasonable, based on profiles.


Anton Scalia "I'm an originalist and a textualist, not a nut."

Only a nut would believe, knowing what we find out after the event, these peoples rights come ahead of public safety. Screw the nuts.
 
Amidst the ever predictable knee jerk cries for gun control by the left and screams from the right for armed teachers and metal detectors in schools, everyone is glossing over the real problem here and that is the failure of our mental health system. While I agree that authorities need more leeway in involuntarily detaining people for observation, it needs to be done carefully in order to protect our civil rights.

There couldn't have been any more warning signs with Nikolas Cruz. The police had been to his house 39 times over a seven year period. The FBI was made aware of his threats to shoot up a school and nothing was done despite all of this because up until he actually carried out his threat, no crime had been committed. In obvious cases like Cruz, we need to allow authorities more power to take these people into custody and have them evaluated by a doctor for a week or longer, what ever is necessary to determine if they really are a threat. Instead, these people get pumped up with cocktails of anti-depressants and psychotropic drugs and are dumped back out onto the streets where they can and sometimes do end up hurting a lot of people. However, given our present day society where people get offended by and overreact to every little thing we have to be cautious to also not start witch hunts, dragging innocent people off the streets over surly, off the cuff remarks that are clearly intended as hyperbole. How many times have we all said, "Oh, I'd like to kill that person!" but we aren't really going to do it.

This coupled with the fact that American society in general has been slowly decaying over the last few decades, it's time we start addressing the disease instead of wanting to treat the symptoms. Guns are not the disease. Burdening over 99% of the gun owners in this country due to the heinous actions of less than 1% are not going to solve this problem. Gun control didn't stop the Bataclan Massacre in Paris in 2015 where 130 people were slaughtered with illegal automatic weapons nor did it stop the Charlie Hebdo attacks in the same city. It didn't stop Anders Breivik from gunning down and murdering 77 people in Norway in 2011. It didn't stop machete wielding terrorists from slicing and dicing over 100 people at a train station in Kunming, China in 2014. And while gun control advocates like to point to Britain and Australia as models of success, their murder rates have gone up at times and gone down at times after their gun bans were passed. Less people may have been killed by firearms, but at times more people were actually being murdered than before and at other times less, indicating it really made little difference. Dead is dead regardless of how you get that way.

Conversely, the conservative solution isn't exactly desirable either. Nothing says "Land of the Free" like metal detectors along with teachers and police carrying guns in every school across the country, right? Do you really want to be raising your children in a Soviet style police state? What kind of small government is that, exactly?

Unfortunately, it seems partisans on both sides are more interested in fingerpointing and demonizing the opposition while also pushing knee jerk solutions based on pure emotion that won't have any affect other than to burden the vast majority of the populace who aren't the threat. Hence, as always, I don't see much coming of this latest incident, but one must wonder how many more events like this we are willing to tolerate until Americans want to honestly address this problem.

Florida sheriff calls for more power to detain people after school shooting
Until we get back to treating these kids like they are adults in training there will be no change no matter how many laws are passed. We treat them like they can't handle the truth or take any responsibility for themselves. That idiot governor in Florida thinks the solution is to raise the age of purchasing a gun. Great, let's delay adulthood even more. They already can't get jobs until 18, can't mow lawns without the cops harassing them and can't even sell lemonade without a permit but they can stay on their parents insurance until 26, can't buy a beer until 21.

We've taken this coddling of kids to a level of stupid it's going to be hard to get out of at this point. We don't teach them morals or responsibilty we teach them it's not their fault. It is their fault they are worthless pricks and they need to pay the price for it. Until then nothing is going to change.
 
It has gotten hard everywhere. And many times if they seem rational when they get to a hospital, if they don’t want to be held, they release them. I know of a case of just such a few months ago in LA, her sister-in-law called ems out because she had texted her several times that evening saying she was going to kill herself, and had 2 babies at home. The hospital let her go, that evening, even after seeing her texts to both her hubby on an oil platform and her sil.
Amidst the ever predictable knee jerk cries for gun control by the left and screams from the right for armed teachers and metal detectors in schools, everyone is glossing over the real problem here and that is the failure of our mental health system. While I agree that authorities need more leeway in involuntarily detaining people for observation, it needs to be done carefully in order to protect our civil rights.

There couldn't have been any more warning signs with Nikolas Cruz. The police had been to his house 39 times over a seven year period. The FBI was made aware of his threats to shoot up a school and nothing was done despite all of this because up until he actually carried out his threat, no crime had been committed. In obvious cases like Cruz, we need to allow authorities more power to take these people into custody and have them evaluated by a doctor for a week or longer, what ever is necessary to determine if they really are a threat. Instead, these people get pumped up with cocktails of anti-depressants and psychotropic drugs and are dumped back out onto the streets where they can and sometimes do end up hurting a lot of people. However, given our present day society where people get offended by and overreact to every little thing we have to be cautious to also not start witch hunts, dragging innocent people off the streets over surly, off the cuff remarks that are clearly intended as hyperbole. How many times have we all said, "Oh, I'd like to kill that person!" but we aren't really going to do it.

This coupled with the fact that American society in general has been slowly decaying over the last few decades, it's time we start addressing the disease instead of wanting to treat the symptoms. Guns are not the disease. Burdening over 99% of the gun owners in this country due to the heinous actions of less than 1% are not going to solve this problem. Gun control didn't stop the Bataclan Massacre in Paris in 2015 where 130 people were slaughtered with illegal automatic weapons nor did it stop the Charlie Hebdo attacks in the same city. It didn't stop Anders Breivik from gunning down and murdering 77 people in Norway in 2011. It didn't stop machete wielding terrorists from slicing and dicing over 100 people at a train station in Kunming, China in 2014. And while gun control advocates like to point to Britain and Australia as models of success, their murder rates have gone up at times and gone down at times after their gun bans were passed. Less people may have been killed by firearms, but at times more people were actually being murdered than before and at other times less, indicating it really made little difference. Dead is dead regardless of how you get that way.

Conversely, the conservative solution isn't exactly desirable either. Nothing says "Land of the Free" like metal detectors along with teachers and police carrying guns in every school across the country, right? Do you really want to be raising your children in a Soviet style police state? What kind of small government is that, exactly?

Unfortunately, it seems partisans on both sides are more interested in fingerpointing and demonizing the opposition while also pushing knee jerk solutions based on pure emotion that won't have any affect other than to burden the vast majority of the populace who aren't the threat. Hence, as always, I don't see much coming of this latest incident, but one must wonder how many more events like this we are willing to tolerate until Americans want to honestly address this problem.

Florida sheriff calls for more power to detain people after school shooting

Is it really that hard to Baker Act someone in Florida? I didn't think it was all that difficult. I'm not sure that having the authority was the issue in this situation.
 
Amidst the ever predictable knee jerk cries for gun control by the left and screams from the right for armed teachers and metal detectors in schools, everyone is glossing over the real problem here and that is the failure of our mental health system. While I agree that authorities need more leeway in involuntarily detaining people for observation, it needs to be done carefully in order to protect our civil rights.

There couldn't have been any more warning signs with Nikolas Cruz. The police had been to his house 39 times over a seven year period. The FBI was made aware of his threats to shoot up a school and nothing was done despite all of this because up until he actually carried out his threat, no crime had been committed. In obvious cases like Cruz, we need to allow authorities more power to take these people into custody and have them evaluated by a doctor for a week or longer, what ever is necessary to determine if they really are a threat. Instead, these people get pumped up with cocktails of anti-depressants and psychotropic drugs and are dumped back out onto the streets where they can and sometimes do end up hurting a lot of people. However, given our present day society where people get offended by and overreact to every little thing we have to be cautious to also not start witch hunts, dragging innocent people off the streets over surly, off the cuff remarks that are clearly intended as hyperbole. How many times have we all said, "Oh, I'd like to kill that person!" but we aren't really going to do it.

This coupled with the fact that American society in general has been slowly decaying over the last few decades, it's time we start addressing the disease instead of wanting to treat the symptoms. Guns are not the disease. Burdening over 99% of the gun owners in this country due to the heinous actions of less than 1% are not going to solve this problem. Gun control didn't stop the Bataclan Massacre in Paris in 2015 where 130 people were slaughtered with illegal automatic weapons nor did it stop the Charlie Hebdo attacks in the same city. It didn't stop Anders Breivik from gunning down and murdering 77 people in Norway in 2011. It didn't stop machete wielding terrorists from slicing and dicing over 100 people at a train station in Kunming, China in 2014. And while gun control advocates like to point to Britain and Australia as models of success, their murder rates have gone up at times and gone down at times after their gun bans were passed. Less people may have been killed by firearms, but at times more people were actually being murdered than before and at other times less, indicating it really made little difference. Dead is dead regardless of how you get that way.

Conversely, the conservative solution isn't exactly desirable either. Nothing says "Land of the Free" like metal detectors along with teachers and police carrying guns in every school across the country, right? Do you really want to be raising your children in a Soviet style police state? What kind of small government is that, exactly?

Unfortunately, it seems partisans on both sides are more interested in fingerpointing and demonizing the opposition while also pushing knee jerk solutions based on pure emotion that won't have any affect other than to burden the vast majority of the populace who aren't the threat. Hence, as always, I don't see much coming of this latest incident, but one must wonder how many more events like this we are willing to tolerate until Americans want to honestly address this problem.

Florida sheriff calls for more power to detain people after school shooting

It's not a "knee-jerk" suggestion to suggest something that has worked elsewhere. Israel has had armed teachers for years. School shootings are almost unheard of in Israel. Why? Because any person thinking about a school shooting knows that a number of people at the school have a gun and know how to use it, which greatly increases the odds that he would get shot and would not get to kill very many kids, if any.
 
It has gotten hard everywhere. And many times if they seem rational when they get to a hospital, if they don’t want to be held, they release them. I know of a case of just such a few months ago in LA, her sister-in-law called ems out because she had texted her several times that evening saying she was going to kill herself, and had 2 babies at home. The hospital let her go, that evening, even after seeing her texts to both her hubby on an oil platform and her sil.
Amidst the ever predictable knee jerk cries for gun control by the left and screams from the right for armed teachers and metal detectors in schools, everyone is glossing over the real problem here and that is the failure of our mental health system. While I agree that authorities need more leeway in involuntarily detaining people for observation, it needs to be done carefully in order to protect our civil rights.

There couldn't have been any more warning signs with Nikolas Cruz. The police had been to his house 39 times over a seven year period. The FBI was made aware of his threats to shoot up a school and nothing was done despite all of this because up until he actually carried out his threat, no crime had been committed. In obvious cases like Cruz, we need to allow authorities more power to take these people into custody and have them evaluated by a doctor for a week or longer, what ever is necessary to determine if they really are a threat. Instead, these people get pumped up with cocktails of anti-depressants and psychotropic drugs and are dumped back out onto the streets where they can and sometimes do end up hurting a lot of people. However, given our present day society where people get offended by and overreact to every little thing we have to be cautious to also not start witch hunts, dragging innocent people off the streets over surly, off the cuff remarks that are clearly intended as hyperbole. How many times have we all said, "Oh, I'd like to kill that person!" but we aren't really going to do it.

This coupled with the fact that American society in general has been slowly decaying over the last few decades, it's time we start addressing the disease instead of wanting to treat the symptoms. Guns are not the disease. Burdening over 99% of the gun owners in this country due to the heinous actions of less than 1% are not going to solve this problem. Gun control didn't stop the Bataclan Massacre in Paris in 2015 where 130 people were slaughtered with illegal automatic weapons nor did it stop the Charlie Hebdo attacks in the same city. It didn't stop Anders Breivik from gunning down and murdering 77 people in Norway in 2011. It didn't stop machete wielding terrorists from slicing and dicing over 100 people at a train station in Kunming, China in 2014. And while gun control advocates like to point to Britain and Australia as models of success, their murder rates have gone up at times and gone down at times after their gun bans were passed. Less people may have been killed by firearms, but at times more people were actually being murdered than before and at other times less, indicating it really made little difference. Dead is dead regardless of how you get that way.

Conversely, the conservative solution isn't exactly desirable either. Nothing says "Land of the Free" like metal detectors along with teachers and police carrying guns in every school across the country, right? Do you really want to be raising your children in a Soviet style police state? What kind of small government is that, exactly?

Unfortunately, it seems partisans on both sides are more interested in fingerpointing and demonizing the opposition while also pushing knee jerk solutions based on pure emotion that won't have any affect other than to burden the vast majority of the populace who aren't the threat. Hence, as always, I don't see much coming of this latest incident, but one must wonder how many more events like this we are willing to tolerate until Americans want to honestly address this problem.

Florida sheriff calls for more power to detain people after school shooting

Is it really that hard to Baker Act someone in Florida? I didn't think it was all that difficult. I'm not sure that having the authority was the issue in this situation.

That doesn't sound like it was difficult. It sounds as if the Baker Act was used, but whatever hospital assessed her decided she was not a danger to herself. If that was wrong, the failure doesn't seem to be with not having authority to detain her, but in poor assessment. Those are very different things.
 
Actually, I need to make a correction, she was checked by ems and they didn’t take her. I don’t think they should be able to decide. Sorry, I forgot that pertinent point the first time, I was reminded.
It has gotten hard everywhere. And many times if they seem rational when they get to a hospital, if they don’t want to be held, they release them. I know of a case of just such a few months ago in LA, her sister-in-law called ems out because she had texted her several times that evening saying she was going to kill herself, and had 2 babies at home. The hospital let her go, that evening, even after seeing her texts to both her hubby on an oil platform and her sil.
Amidst the ever predictable knee jerk cries for gun control by the left and screams from the right for armed teachers and metal detectors in schools, everyone is glossing over the real problem here and that is the failure of our mental health system. While I agree that authorities need more leeway in involuntarily detaining people for observation, it needs to be done carefully in order to protect our civil rights.

There couldn't have been any more warning signs with Nikolas Cruz. The police had been to his house 39 times over a seven year period. The FBI was made aware of his threats to shoot up a school and nothing was done despite all of this because up until he actually carried out his threat, no crime had been committed. In obvious cases like Cruz, we need to allow authorities more power to take these people into custody and have them evaluated by a doctor for a week or longer, what ever is necessary to determine if they really are a threat. Instead, these people get pumped up with cocktails of anti-depressants and psychotropic drugs and are dumped back out onto the streets where they can and sometimes do end up hurting a lot of people. However, given our present day society where people get offended by and overreact to every little thing we have to be cautious to also not start witch hunts, dragging innocent people off the streets over surly, off the cuff remarks that are clearly intended as hyperbole. How many times have we all said, "Oh, I'd like to kill that person!" but we aren't really going to do it.

This coupled with the fact that American society in general has been slowly decaying over the last few decades, it's time we start addressing the disease instead of wanting to treat the symptoms. Guns are not the disease. Burdening over 99% of the gun owners in this country due to the heinous actions of less than 1% are not going to solve this problem. Gun control didn't stop the Bataclan Massacre in Paris in 2015 where 130 people were slaughtered with illegal automatic weapons nor did it stop the Charlie Hebdo attacks in the same city. It didn't stop Anders Breivik from gunning down and murdering 77 people in Norway in 2011. It didn't stop machete wielding terrorists from slicing and dicing over 100 people at a train station in Kunming, China in 2014. And while gun control advocates like to point to Britain and Australia as models of success, their murder rates have gone up at times and gone down at times after their gun bans were passed. Less people may have been killed by firearms, but at times more people were actually being murdered than before and at other times less, indicating it really made little difference. Dead is dead regardless of how you get that way.

Conversely, the conservative solution isn't exactly desirable either. Nothing says "Land of the Free" like metal detectors along with teachers and police carrying guns in every school across the country, right? Do you really want to be raising your children in a Soviet style police state? What kind of small government is that, exactly?

Unfortunately, it seems partisans on both sides are more interested in fingerpointing and demonizing the opposition while also pushing knee jerk solutions based on pure emotion that won't have any affect other than to burden the vast majority of the populace who aren't the threat. Hence, as always, I don't see much coming of this latest incident, but one must wonder how many more events like this we are willing to tolerate until Americans want to honestly address this problem.

Florida sheriff calls for more power to detain people after school shooting

Is it really that hard to Baker Act someone in Florida? I didn't think it was all that difficult. I'm not sure that having the authority was the issue in this situation.

That doesn't sound like it was difficult. It sounds as if the Baker Act was used, but whatever hospital assessed her decided she was not a danger to herself. If that was wrong, the failure doesn't seem to be with not having authority to detain her, but in poor assessment. Those are very different things.
 
Israel pleaded with lawmakers in Tallahassee, the state capital, and Washington to give police the power to detain people "if they see something on social media, if they see graphic pictures of rifles and blood and gore and guns and bombs, if they see something, horrific language, if they see a person talking about ‘I want to grow up to be a serial killer.'" ibid

A truly dreadful, reckless, and irresponsible idea.

Israel is at liberty to detain whomever he wants for whatever reason, such as social media content – provided he understands there will never be a conviction with such a flagrant violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, where his department and county will be forced into bankruptcy the consequence of civil suits brought by those unlawfully detained.

Indeed, if Tallahassee or Washington were to enact such a measure, it would never pass Constitutional muster, being immediately enjoined and eventually invalidated by the courts, and appropriately so.
 

Forum List

Back
Top