easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,126
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #21
As pointed out the near Super Majority control of Congress and Obama added more debt than EVERY US President from Washington to Slick Willey, setting deficit-spending records while doing so, and you want to cry, "B...b...b...but Bush?!'It hasn't yet. If you believe Barry, anything and everything NEGATIVE in his 8 years has all been Bush's fault.Barry added nearly $7 trillion in new debt in ONLY 4 years, setting 'monthly' / 'annual' / 'total' U.S. deficit-spending records while doing so. He added more debt than EVERY U.S. president from Washington to Clinton COMBINED.
When did Bush's policies stop affecting govt?
Is more money added to the deficit a negative thing? If so, why cant he point at Bush since thats where it came from?
Cause you dont like it? Or you dont want to add an asterisk to your talking point?
Let's talk about Bush:
Bush added $4 trillion in 8 Years...compared to Barry's near $7 trillion in only 4. In Bush's 1st 6 (SIX) years - during 9/11/01, the economic aftermath, and 2 wars - he and a GOP / split Congress added $2.5 trillion in new debt. At the start of Bush's last 2 years in office the Democrats took over a near SUPER MAJORITY control (5 seats shy) of Congress. THAT means the last 2 years of Bush's time in office -- the time when Liberals declare the economy went south and the deficit began to rise -- the DEMOCRATS controlled spending, the deficit, and the economy. I couldn't agree more. In those last 2 years the LIBERAL CONGRESS added another $1.5 TRILLION in new debt. In only 2 years the Democrats added almost half as much as Bush did in 6 years.
Their Super majority control of Congress - and the spending, the budget, and the economy - lasted through the end of Obama's 1st 2 years in office.
Bush's piece of the Deficit over 8 years? $2.5 trillion (in 6 years) To include Bush's last 2 years and Obama's 1st 4 years Obama and Liberals have caused the economy to decline and added approx. $8 Trillion in 6 years compared to Bush's $2.5 trillion.