Shattering Shattered

[Flanders]

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51iROWOMW8L._SX327_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

Hillary’s defeat(s) can be summed up in a single word —— LOSER.

Has the Kultursmog learned anything since Hillary’s defeat, by which we mean her latest defeat? You will recall that in her 2016 race she was dubbed the “inevitable” one, at least until the clock struck 8 p.m. on November 8, much as she was dubbed the “inevitable” one through the election cycle of 2008 until there emerged a little-known community organizer.​

Question: Which Democrat will run against Hillary for the nomination in 2020? Answer: The list of Democrat challengers is longer than the Republicans who were chomping at the bit to run against Hillary in 2016 because she is loser.

Now there has appeared from the hazy vapors of the smog a book attempting to explain the election, and all the smog’s outlets are reviewing it. The book is entitled Shattered: Inside Hillary’s Clinton’s Doomed Campaign. The best thing about it is the title, Shattered. After that, it is pretty uneven. There are a few glints of understanding, but from what I can tell from reading Shattered and its reviews, the Kultursmog remains securely in the dark. According to it, Hillary was the victim of plots by FBI Director James B. Comey, Russian hackers, errors made by her staff, the sinister doings of “the deplorables,” and misogyny. Six decades after the dawn of feminism, with the feminists’ fingerprints all over the republic, Hillary still cannot get a break. Though I am told by reliable sources that up there in the Kultursmog she is contemplating another suicidal run in 2020. She does not take no for an answer.

Hillary As Seen by Official Washington
R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.
April 26, 2017, 12:01 am

Hillary As Seen by Official Washington​

NOTE: Hillary’s loss to Obama in 2008 was blamed on his skin color; i.e., the first black guy against the first woman was the excuse because their policies were identical. Had media excuse-makers seen she lost because she is loser they would not have given her the nomination in 2016. They still do not get it. I suspect they will give her another chance in 2020 regardless of her health, her age, her criminal activities. The question is who will run against the Gorgon for the nomination the next time?

If I had to pick Hillary’s primary opponent in 2020 this far out I would settle on Upchuck Schumer. The Media loves senators, and Democrat money love United Nations America-haters; so Upchuck’s track record is not a negative to the Lefties.

NOTE: Schumer is a senator from NYC not New York State. That makes NYC the only city that can claim a U.S. Senator. He will not change his loyalties as president. That is the only thing non-Democrat voters need to know about him.

Finally, try this one on for size.

1. Hillary’s penchant for losing will not stop her from grooming Chelsea for a run at the presidency should she, Hillary, falter before 2020.

2. Donald Trump is grooming Ivanka for a run in 2024. Regardless of the year, and the reported friendship between Ivanka and Chelsea, there is a good chance they will square off. Get your bets down now:

https://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.tJdPor46YiXSftLsQkPFEwEsDI&pid=Api&w=270&h=181

p.s. Before Hillary lost to Obama in 2008 I said Sarah Palin would slap Hillary silly if they ran against each other in a general election.

 

[midcan5]

Americans berate religions and societies they consider backward, but given America attitude towards women they need to look in the mirror. Misogyny lives here as it does in the hearts of the ignorant everywhere.

For me one of the most fascinating, in a rather morbid sense, is Hillary hatred. It demonstrates how hate can be taught and cultivated. Are all - or many - white males, and even some women, misogynists and / or so weak they can be managed to hate a person based on nothing substantive? Trump is a weak, insecure man, his silly tweets show this almost daily, but beyond that he helped create an atmosphere of hate with only words. Most lies or exaggerations.

'What happened when I went for a run in my I’M WITH HER shirt after the election'
What happened when I went for a run in my I’M WITH HER shirt after the election

"Trump’s campaign rests on a foundation of hatred and hostility toward the “other” – with other defined as individuals who do not fit the standard rightwing Republican profile of a white, middle to middle-upper class male who tolerates little dissent against the conservative “Bible” of right-wing media rhetoric, and displays active disdain for the poor, immigrants, liberals and minorities. By understanding what’s at stake in this election, we gain a better understanding of the direction our country is headed. The electoral outcome will not be decided until November, but the battle between progressive societal forces and reactionary opponents of change has never been more stark." Anthony Dimaggio Donald Trump and the Myth of Economic Populism: Demolishing a False Narrative

'The dark depths of hatred for Hillary Clinton'

"In the decades that the Clintons have been in the public eye, US politics has become increasingly polarised - a process partly fuelled by the proliferation of radical voices on talk radio and the internet. The election of Barack Obama - the first black president, and one of the most liberal for decades - also proved to be a red rag to some, including D'Souza." The dark depths of hatred for Hillary Clinton - BBC News

 

[strollingbones]

why not discuss the loser yall elected who is setting this country back daily?

 

[Flanders]

why not discuss the loser yall elected who is setting this country back daily?

To strollingbones: Get real. Whitewashing Hillary by invoking Trump is not a smart move.

Trump holds the only position in government he ever held for the grand total of 99 days. He can hardly be blamed for setting the country back to the disaster he inherited from three generations of Democrat control.

Do you truly believe that Trump is worse than Hillary’s decades in government? Then-Senator Hillary Clinton followed by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton soaked herself in blood —— not to mention the Branch Davidian Massacre when she was first lady. And let us not forget that she took charge of bimbo eruptions so she could cover up Bill’s perverse appetites including rape. To be fair, somebody else covered up this one:

The authors argue “that Bill Clinton’s first alleged rape was of a 19-year-old coed named Eileen Wellstone. We believe that he was not prosecuted because the State Department did not want a Rhodes Scholar charged with rape.”

Clinton allegedly sexually assaulted her after they met at a bar near Oxford. He claimed they had consensual sex and Wellstone chose not to pursue the case. A report was filed by a State Department official, which the authors point out, “was ignored by superiors.”

Video: Was Bill Clinton Expelled from Oxford Because He Raped Eileen Wellstone?
Posted on October 7, 2016 by Bethany Blankley

Video: Was Bill Clinton Expelled from Oxford Because He Raped Eileen Wellstone?​

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Sha doo beee......................

 

[Flanders]

If I had to pick Hillary’s primary opponent in 2020 this far out I would settle on Upchuck Schumer.

The circus is coming to town.

Joe Biden has been saying yes to nearly all the political invitations coming his way, with new ones arriving almost daily. Privately, the former vice president and his staff have started talking about how to begin planning a strategy with a roughly 18-month timeline so that if he decides on another presidential run, he’ll be best positioned to get it off the ground.​

Biden keeps 2020 options open
By Edward-Isaac Dovere
04/30/17 07:04 AM EDT
Updated 04/30/17 03:00 PM EDT

Biden keeps 2020 options open​

A criminal traitor, the guy who was never right about anything in his life, a fake Indian, and a gaga Socialist are lining up to be Upchuck Schumer’s competition.

I never thought I would live long enough to look forward to a presidential election. How can I not look forward to a barrel of chattering monkeys debating each other! If there is a God in heaven every baboon will remain healthy until the day after their nomination convention.

 

[Flanders]

Then-Senator Hillary Clinton followed by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton soaked herself in blood —— not to mention the Branch Davidian Massacre when she was first lady.

Add Hillary’s love of baby killers to her blood soaked résumé and you have to wonder about her definition of cruelty:

Hillary Clinton castigated President Trump's federal budget proposal during a keynote address on Tuesday, calling it an attack on the needy that showed an "unimaginable level of cruelty."​

And talk about doublespeak! Hillary Clinton looking out for children is akin to Ilsa Koch protecting Jews:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/02/Ilse_Koch.png/220px-Ilse_Koch.png

Ilse Koch - Wikipedia

The failed 2016 Democratic presidential candidate gave a speech after being honored at the Children's Health Fund Annual Benefit in New York City. Clinton used her remarks to attack Trump's new federal budget plan only hours after it was released.​

"This administration and Republicans in Congress are mounting an onslaught against the needs of children and people with disabilities, women, and seniors," Clinton said.​

Clinton: Trump Budget Shows ‘Unimaginable Level of Cruelty’
BY: Madeleine Weast
May 24, 2017 9:44 am

Clinton: Trump Budget Shows 'Unimaginable Level of Cruelty'​

 

[Flanders]

Add Hillary’s love of baby killers to her blood soaked résumé and you have to wonder about her definition of cruelty:

Alas, Democrats got the latest talking point from the DNC:

De Blasio on Trump Budget: ‘Children Will Die’
by Pam Key
23 May 2017

De Blasio on Trump Budget: ‘Children Will Die’ - Breitbart​

So will children die in Planned Parenthood’s butcher shops if funding is included in Trump’s budget.

Every policy is incidental to Democrats. Democrats always twist their position on every issue to include saving children. Ask Democrats if the sun shines on the equator and they will answer “SAVE THE CHILDREN.” My question is: How come the Democrat party’s Culture of Death continues killing these children?

The cruelest immigration policy of all is that the very people who slaughter children in the tens of million always cite THE CHILDREN whenever they want more money for the welfare state. Their score to date is 100,000,000 ——55 million abortions in America alone —— 45 million children condemned to death by the United Nations ban on DDT. The total rises by several million every year.​

Open-Borders Equals No-Borders Forever

 

[Flanders]

How come the Democrat party’s Culture of Death continues killing these children?

The Party of Liars goes full bore accusing Republicans of lying. It did not take them long to adapt the same strategy to their Culture of Death. It is a hoot when one of the biggest liars in the Democrat party does it:

Hillary Clinton: GOP Becomes ‘Death Party’ if They Pass Senate Healthcare Bill
by Tony Lee
23 Jun 2017

Hillary Clinton: GOP Becomes 'Death Party' if They Pass Senate Healthcare Bill - Breitbart​