Seriously cannot get over this disturbing 9/11 issue?

Even if there was some weakening of the steel, then the top of the tree would topple over off of the resistance of the many VERTICAL columns that run from bedrock to the top floor.

what a fucking moron.....

this response is called debwunking...he debwunk you by calling you.. a moron..
...you have been debwunked by a debwunker

so you are also claiming that the top of the building should have fell over the side instead of crashing through the rest of the building below it?
 
what a fucking moron.....

this response is called debwunking...he debwunk you by calling you.. a moron..
...you have been debwunked by a debwunker

so you are also claiming that the top of the building should have fell over the side instead of crashing through the rest of the building below it?

buildings collapse in a controlled manner.. in a controlled demolition ..because precise parts of the structure are taken out with precise timing otherwise the building would not collapse in a controlled manner as seen in the towers and wtc 7
 
this response is called debwunking...he debwunk you by calling you.. a moron..
...you have been debwunked by a debwunker

so you are also claiming that the top of the building should have fell over the side instead of crashing through the rest of the building below it?

buildings collapse in a controlled manner.. in a controlled demolition ..because precise parts of the structure are taken out with precise timing otherwise the building would not collapse in a controlled manner as seen in the towers and wtc 7
what part of they were DESIGNED to do that have you missed
 
more proof your a debwunker^^^^
ah, a fucking moron makes up his own word that has ZERO meaning

zero meaning.. exactly...just like debwunkers...its the perfect word

I also created the word demestOfascist...for the emerging domestic terrorist
tea partys..gun rights folk...returnig vets.. etc

you mean the troofers like the guys that attacked the pentagon and the IRS in TX?
 
What I seriously cannot get over is the fact that the top floor in each building hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it.

Each building has many VERTICAL core columns that run from bedrock to the top floor. These core columns are fastened and welded together all the way up making them virtually one solid length of steel from bedrock to the top floor. They acted as if they did not even exist to provide hardly any resistance. Somehow the top floor in each building hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it even though it had to work its way all the way down through all these VERTICAL support columns.

NONE of the debunking propaganda addresses the VERTICAL core columns and actually mislead by focusing on the horizontal floor trusses.

The VERTICAL core columns are the many tree trunks of the steel structured buildings and the HORIZONTAL trusses the debunking propaganda focuses on are the tree branches of the steel structured buildings.

femacore.gif


How did our country evolve to get debunking propaganda to sway votes against new investigations....instead of just having a new investigation?

How many upper floors were in free fall? Once they started dropping the weight of the upper floors in free fall easily over came the Resistance available from the lower floors. Pretty simple concept.
 
What I seriously cannot get over is the fact that the top floor in each building hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it.

Each building has many VERTICAL core columns that run from bedrock to the top floor. These core columns are fastened and welded together all the way up making them virtually one solid length of steel from bedrock to the top floor. They acted as if they did not even exist to provide hardly any resistance. Somehow the top floor in each building hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it even though it had to work its way all the way down through all these VERTICAL support columns.

NONE of the debunking propaganda addresses the VERTICAL core columns and actually mislead by focusing on the horizontal floor trusses.

The VERTICAL core columns are the many tree trunks of the steel structured buildings and the HORIZONTAL trusses the debunking propaganda focuses on are the tree branches of the steel structured buildings.

femacore.gif


How did our country evolve to get debunking propaganda to sway votes against new investigations....instead of just having a new investigation?

How many upper floors were in free fall? Once they started dropping the weight of the upper floors in free fall easily over came the Resistance available from the lower floors. Pretty simple concept.

lol...NIST rejected your simple concept of the pancake theory...you don't even know the official cause of the collapse..not that it would make any difference to you if you did..it would just become your next simple concept to regurgitate
 
What I seriously cannot get over is the fact that the top floor in each building hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it.

Each building has many VERTICAL core columns that run from bedrock to the top floor. These core columns are fastened and welded together all the way up making them virtually one solid length of steel from bedrock to the top floor. They acted as if they did not even exist to provide hardly any resistance. Somehow the top floor in each building hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it even though it had to work its way all the way down through all these VERTICAL support columns.

NONE of the debunking propaganda addresses the VERTICAL core columns and actually mislead by focusing on the horizontal floor trusses.

The VERTICAL core columns are the many tree trunks of the steel structured buildings and the HORIZONTAL trusses the debunking propaganda focuses on are the tree branches of the steel structured buildings.

femacore.gif


How did our country evolve to get debunking propaganda to sway votes against new investigations....instead of just having a new investigation?

How many upper floors were in free fall? Once they started dropping the weight of the upper floors in free fall easily over came the Resistance available from the lower floors. Pretty simple concept.

lol...NIST rejected your simple concept of the pancake theory...you don't even know the official cause of the collapse..not that it would make any difference to you if you did..it would just become your next simple concept to regurgitate

where did you see him say "pancake", jackass? :cuckoo:

he said the weight of the floors above overcame the resistance of the floors below easily.
 
How many upper floors were in free fall? Once they started dropping the weight of the upper floors in free fall easily over came the Resistance available from the lower floors. Pretty simple concept.

lol...NIST rejected your simple concept of the pancake theory...you don't even know the official cause of the collapse..not that it would make any difference to you if you did..it would just become your next simple concept to regurgitate

where did you see him say "pancake", jackass? :cuckoo:

he said the weight of the floors above overcame the resistance of the floors below easily.

and that explanation is called the pancake theory and it was rejected by NIST after truthers showed it was stupid and made no sense
 
You have posted the only official depiction of what FEMA shows how core of the tower was constructed. I personally know that diagram is a misrepresentation and cannot be verified by independent sources.

Concrete can be instantly fractured to fall freely by a small amount of properly placed high explosives. Steel cannot.

Maybe this provides some clue of WHY there is so much resistence in the truth movement to the notion of a concrete core. It also should tell you that the leadership of the truth movement is FALSE.

All if the events at the WTC can be explained by using the correct building material.

Five phenomenal factors of 9-11

Another reason the false leaders of the truth movement refuse to consider the concrete core information even though it is the only core structure that can be proven to have existed from independently verified sources.

you do know there are steel rebar cages inside the disapearing concrete....one does wonder about all the twisted steel beams iin that big pile.....
and not even a remote sight of rebar
especially not the claimed 3" DoD steel rebar

Oh yes there is rebar surrounding the core area,

spire_dust-3.jpg


Right where the concrete was seconds before, the curved line behind the interior box columns can only be concrete.

shearspirewall.jpg
 
you do know there are steel rebar cages inside the disapearing concrete....one does wonder about all the twisted steel beams iin that big pile.....
and not even a remote sight of rebar
especially not the claimed 3" DoD steel rebar

Oh yes there is rebar surrounding the core area,

spire_dust-3.jpg


Right where the concrete was seconds before, the curved line behind the interior box columns can only be concrete.

shearspirewall.jpg
hey dipshit, that is a lot thicker than 3"
you would not be able to see that from the distance that photo was taken had it only been 3" thick
 
and not even a remote sight of rebar
especially not the claimed 3" DoD steel rebar

Oh yes there is rebar surrounding the core area,

spire_dust-3.jpg


Right where the concrete was seconds before, the curved line behind the interior box columns can only be concrete.

shearspirewall.jpg
hey dipshit, that is a lot thicker than 3"
you would not be able to see that from the distance that photo was taken had it only been 3" thick

There are probably 50 of them and some could be on the west wall making 2 layers, so they are seen, obviously, but barely in some spots.
 
you do know there are steel rebar cages inside the disapearing concrete....one does wonder about all the twisted steel beams iin that big pile.....
and not even a remote sight of rebar
especially not the claimed 3" DoD steel rebar

Oh yes there is rebar surrounding the core area,


Right where the concrete was seconds before, the curved line behind the interior box columns can only be concrete.

no rebar in your pictures and no concrete core in your pictures. :cuckoo:
 
You mean "no pictures of steel core columns" because we've seen none. You have shown very well that you are working for the perpetrators trying to keep the methods of mass murder secret because you can produce no image from 9-11 showing the steel core columns you mostly do not try to present.
 
You mean "no pictures of steel core columns" because we've seen none. You have shown very well that you are working for the perpetrators trying to keep the methods of mass murder secret because you can produce no image from 9-11 showing the steel core columns you mostly do not try to present.
:cuckoo:

paranoid schizophrenic.

here's a picture of the steel core on 9/11.
shearspirewall.jpg
 
You mean "no pictures of steel core columns" because we've seen none. You have shown very well that you are working for the perpetrators trying to keep the methods of mass murder secret because you can produce no image from 9-11 showing the steel core columns you mostly do not try to present.
:cuckoo:

paranoid schizophrenic.

here's a picture of the steel core on 9/11.
shearspirewall.jpg

Those columns of the WTC 1 north core wall are outside the core area.

Here is the west side from the north looking south, columns are outside of the concrete wall.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg


Here is a superimposition showing the spire at the NW corner and outside of the core.

superimp.spire.wtc1.jpg


Here is after the spire fell with a very clear view of the core area . . . absolutely empty with rebar standing probably mostly from the norht core wall after the interior box columns of the top, quoted image fell away.

spire_dust-3.jpg
 
You mean "no pictures of steel core columns" because we've seen none. You have shown very well that you are working for the perpetrators trying to keep the methods of mass murder secret because you can produce no image from 9-11 showing the steel core columns you mostly do not try to present.
:cuckoo:

paranoid schizophrenic.

here's a picture of the steel core on 9/11.
shearspirewall.jpg

Those columns of the WTC 1 north core wall are outside the core area.

Here is the west side from the north looking south, columns are outside of the concrete wall.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg


Here is a superimposition showing the spire at the NW corner and outside of the core.

superimp.spire.wtc1.jpg


Here is after the spire fell with a very clear view of the core area . . . absolutely empty with rebar standing probably mostly from the norht core wall after the interior box columns of the top, quoted image fell away.

spire_dust-3.jpg
no concrete, no rebar, all steel
 
What I seriously cannot get over is the fact that the top floor in each building hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it.

Each building has many VERTICAL core columns that run from bedrock to the top floor. These core columns are fastened and welded together all the way up making them virtually one solid length of steel from bedrock to the top floor. They acted as if they did not even exist to provide hardly any resistance. Somehow the top floor in each building hit the ground almost as fast as a ball would if dropped right beside it even though it had to work its way all the way down through all these VERTICAL support columns.

NONE of the debunking propaganda addresses the VERTICAL core columns and actually mislead by focusing on the horizontal floor trusses.

The VERTICAL core columns are the many tree trunks of the steel structured buildings and the HORIZONTAL trusses the debunking propaganda focuses on are the tree branches of the steel structured buildings.

femacore.gif


How did our country evolve to get debunking propaganda to sway votes against new investigations....instead of just having a new investigation?

How many upper floors were in free fall? Once they started dropping the weight of the upper floors in free fall easily over came the Resistance available from the lower floors. Pretty simple concept.

lol...NIST rejected your simple concept of the pancake theory...you don't even know the official cause of the collapse..not that it would make any difference to you if you did..it would just become your next simple concept to regurgitate

Use your OWN logic. By your logic the buildings could not have been brought down with explosives either. If the buildings did not fall at free fall due to the weight of the upper floors slamming into the lower floors then in order to have been brought down at the speed they were by explosives those explosives would have had to have been on MANY floors above the ground in order to facilitate the drop of the buildings. Explosives in the basement would not have brought the building down at free fall using your logic.

So much for those explosions in the basement ehh?
 

Forum List

Back
Top