Separation of Church and State?

The 1st Amendment Makes you wrong, No one can refuse to allow a religious person to exersize his religion, except in certain dire cases of threat to the public. A person most definately CAN get elected to any office and claim God or his religion dictates how he votes. It might not sell well with his voters at home though, but it sure as hell is legal and protected.
 
Prove it.


I have proved it......................Jewish religious laws stating "the law of God" for everyone, have now been written into public law in our country, which negates the separation between church and state...................what don't you understand????????:eusa_think: :rolleyes:


And it's TOTAL BULLSHIT and should be repealed.................:eusa_think: :eusa_whistle:
 
I have proved it......................Jewish religious laws stating "the law" for everyone, have now been written into public law, which negates the separation between church and state...................what don't you understand????????:eusa_think: :rolleyes:


And it's TOTAL BULLSHIT and should be repealed.................:eusa_think: :eusa_whistle:

Yup, we should decriminilze murder right NOW.
 
for the record.. jews werent the first people to outlaw murder.
 
Of course the government assumes jurisdiction over legal issue affecting religion all the time, which is why we have a large body of case law on, for example, the establishment clause.
"Religion", as the word is used in the Constitution, is "the duty we owe to our Creator and the methods of discharging it."

The only "religion" related issue the government has authority to "take cognizance of" is whether or not a man should obey his conscience and convictions in matters of religion. The government should encourage the people to follow their consciences, not the government's wishes, with respect to "purely sacred things."

To ensure that each man would be free to obey the dictates of conscience in matters of religion, the authors of the national charter, as James Madison put it, "wisely exempted" religion from civil authority.
 
Every society had laws based in religion. Egypt... Rome... Greece.... native americans.... they just had more deities.

it's only the jewish rules that get up your nose.

but it's not like they've ever been imposed on non-jews anyway.

what does the song say? "paranoia ... big destroyer".
 
"Religion", as the word is used in the Constitution, is "the duty we owe to our Creator and the methods of discharging it."

The only "religion" related issue the government has authority to "take cognizance of" is whether or not a man should obey his conscience and convictions in matters of religion. The government should encourage the people to follow their consciences, not the government's wishes, with respect to "purely sacred things."

To ensure that each man would be free to obey the dictates of conscience in matters of religion, the authors of the national charter, as James Madison put it, "wisely exempted" religion from civil authority.


George Herbert Walker Bush and his brainwashed minions did not.:rolleyes:
 
"
The only "religion" related issue the government has authority to "take cognizance of" is whether or not a man should obey his conscience and convictions in matters of religion. The government should encourage the people to follow their consciences, not the government's wishes, with respect to "purely sacred things."

You can say that all you want but there is 200 years of Supreme Court case law to show you're wrong. If you were right, the Supreme Court (being government) wouldn't even have been able to take these religion cases. Yet it nevertheless has, and there are plenty of religion cases in courts across the country right now.
 
Every society had laws based in religion. Egypt... Rome... Greece.... native americans.... they just had more deities.

it's only the jewish rules that get up your nose.

but it's not like they've ever been imposed on non-jews anyway.

what does the song say? "paranoia ... big destroyer".


HORSESHIT Jillian.....................http://www.shamash.org/lists/scj-faq/HTML/faq/12-19.html


The great destroyer as you put it is not paranoia.........................it is self righteously imposed servatude and indenture!!!!!!!:rolleyes:
 
But they were the first to impose their laws of God into our public law, with built in horseshit punishment!:eusa_think:

um, no. that's not true at all. Do you think Hamurabi was a jew?
 
um, no. that's not true at all. Do you think Hamurabi was a jew?

Very good. Maybe we can help him some.

When Anu the Sublime, King of the Anunaki, and Bel, the lord of Heaven and earth, who decreed the fate of the land, assigned to Marduk, the over-ruling son of Ea, God of righteousness, dominion over earthly man, and made him great among the Igigi, they called Babylon by his illustrious name, made it great on earth, and founded an everlasting kingdom in it, whose foundations are laid so solidly as those of heaven and earth; then Anu and Bel called by name me, Hammurabi, the exalted prince, who feared God, to bring about the rule of righteousness in the land, to destroy the wicked and the evil-doers; so that the strong should not harm the weak; so that I should rule over the black-headed people like Shamash, and enlighten the land, to further the well-being of mankind.

http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/MESO/CODE.HTM
 
Dude, you just said the Constitution does nothing more than prohibit a national religion. Refusing to allow a religious person to exercise his religion doesn't constitute an establishment of a national religion.


Gee doesn't a proclaimed religious leader and movement being written into our public law DO EXACTLY THAT?????????????:rolleyes: :eusa_think: :eusa_whistle:


AND in extreme MINORITY AT THAT?????:rolleyes:
 

Forum List

Back
Top