Senate passes unanimous resolution avowing a free press

[Frankeneinstein]

Or Jones describing himself.

 

[B. Kidd]

U.S. press given the green light to continue acting like old Soviet Pravda.

Let us all celebrate as we slouch towards total progressive tyranny.

Yippee!

 

[Skylar]

U.S. press given the green light to continue acting like old Soviet Pravda.

Let us all celebrate as we slouch towards total progressive tyranny.

Yippee!

Soviet Pravda worked for the State. Per your argument, the press would be working against the State.

I don't think 'acting like' means what you think it means.

 

[B. Kidd]

U.S. press given the green light to continue acting like old Soviet Pravda.

Let us all celebrate as we slouch towards total progressive tyranny.

Yippee!

Soviet Pravda worked for the State. Per your argument, the press would be working against the State.

I don't think 'acting like' means what you think it means.

Not when the majority of state workers are liberal Democrats; especially in the deep state.

 

[Skylar]

U.S. press given the green light to continue acting like old Soviet Pravda.

Let us all celebrate as we slouch towards total progressive tyranny.

Yippee!

Soviet Pravda worked for the State. Per your argument, the press would be working against the State.

I don't think 'acting like' means what you think it means.

Not when the majority of state workers are liberal Democrats; especially in the deep state.

The 'deep state' being your imaginary batshit that you can't back with actual evidence?

So you're using a fantasy to try and excuse a *ludicrous* blunder on the relationship between Soviet Pravda and the Soviet government?

Keep digging, bro.

 

[rightwinger]

'In a uniform decision Thursday, the U.S. Senate voted to "reaffirm the vital and indispensable role the free press serves."

Why it matters: The resolution comes on the heels of a nationwide push by hundreds of local and national newspapers to publish editorials standing up for the press in response to President Trump's claims the press is an "enemy of the people."'

Senate passes unanimous resolution avowing a free press

Good for the Senate.

Will Trump sign up to it?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The Liberal press has the right to be assholes. Trump has the right to remind Americans that the Liberal press are assholes.

The liberal press has the right and obligation to highlight Trump's criminality.

 

[B. Kidd]

U.S. press given the green light to continue acting like old Soviet Pravda.

Let us all celebrate as we slouch towards total progressive tyranny.

Yippee!

Soviet Pravda worked for the State. Per your argument, the press would be working against the State.

I don't think 'acting like' means what you think it means.

Not when the majority of state workers are liberal Democrats; especially in the deep state.

The 'deep state' being your imaginary batshit that you can't back with actual evidence?

So you're using a fantasy to try and excuse a *ludicrous* blunder on the relationship between Soviet Pravda and the Soviet government?

Keep digging, bro.

And keep yet head in da sand, sis.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

The liberal press has the right and obligation to highlight Trump's criminality.

While that is true, you are confusing them with the free press

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The liberal press has the right and obligation to highlight Trump's criminality.

While that is true, you are confusing them with the free press

Just as free as you are, loser.

 

[Reasonable]

'In a uniform decision Thursday, the U.S. Senate voted to "reaffirm the vital and indispensable role the free press serves."

Why it matters: The resolution comes on the heels of a nationwide push by hundreds of local and national newspapers to publish editorials standing up for the press in response to President Trump's claims the press is an "enemy of the people."'

Senate passes unanimous resolution avowing a free press

Good for the Senate.

It’s disgusting this was even needed to be done.
More proof how Mueller’s bitch has eroded our American institutions.

 

[Reasonable]

'In a uniform decision Thursday, the U.S. Senate voted to "reaffirm the vital and indispensable role the free press serves."

Why it matters: The resolution comes on the heels of a nationwide push by hundreds of local and national newspapers to publish editorials standing up for the press in response to President Trump's claims the press is an "enemy of the people."'

Senate passes unanimous resolution avowing a free press

Good for the Senate.

Does that include Alex Jones and Infowars? Does it include those that have had their youtube channels deleted from the web? Facebook deletions of citizen journalists that do the job that the lamestream "Operation Mockingbird" media refuses to do because six conglomerates own 90 percent of what is printed and aired????

Yep, it includes them all, false and misleading news, conspiracy theories, and out right liars. Having a free media is disturbing as it was meant to be.

The only false and misleading news that I have seen is that of the lamestream media that get their marching orders from the heads of the six media conglomerates that have seats on the same elite committees and control 90 percent of all media.

Pizzagate devotee. Ha!

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Just as free as you are, loser.

I see you've decided to make your academic argument...what is that suppose to mean? it appears there is a segment/level of comprehension missing from your reply

 

[Slyhunter]

When the President's people are 'signalling' that Truth isn't Truth....such a resolution becomes a might bit more.

The fact that such a resolution of basic constitutional principles is necessary today is yet another in an endless swamp of fetid demonstrations of the depth and severity of the corruption of this president.

How is he violating the constitution by bashing a press that bashes him?

He's already had his people float the idea that the President should have the power to shutdown any news agency the president deems is propagating 'fake news'.

With a full 43% of republicans polled supporting empowering the President to shut down any news agency that is engaged in 'bad behavior'.

Resolutions such as those passed by the Senate are necessary due to the loathsome and rampant corruption of the President and how eager many republicans are to grant the President unprecedented powers to attack the press.

Until something actual happens it's nothing but words, and no constitutional violation. Dems have been bitching about "doing something" about Fox News for a decade now with nothing actually happening, where was your angst about that?

And you keep using the word corruption without any evidence of actual corruption.

How about you just say you don't like him or his policies? Why do you feel the need to create figments of criminal acts via the word corruption?

The Press is supposed to be the watchdog of the American people. We need a Watchdog to make sure their doing their jobs and not simply pushing a Liberal agenda.

Holding the President accountable for his corruption, lies, and crimes by reporting on them isn't a 'liberal' agenda.

Its an American one.

They didn't hold Obama accountable for his.
They ignore what good he has done like the lowest black unemployment numbers ever. They don't report the good stuff at all. They did with Obama.

 

[Skylar]

How is he violating the constitution by bashing a press that bashes him?

He's already had his people float the idea that the President should have the power to shutdown any news agency the president deems is propagating 'fake news'.

With a full 43% of republicans polled supporting empowering the President to shut down any news agency that is engaged in 'bad behavior'.

Resolutions such as those passed by the Senate are necessary due to the loathsome and rampant corruption of the President and how eager many republicans are to grant the President unprecedented powers to attack the press.

Until something actual happens it's nothing but words, and no constitutional violation. Dems have been bitching about "doing something" about Fox News for a decade now with nothing actually happening, where was your angst about that?

And you keep using the word corruption without any evidence of actual corruption.

How about you just say you don't like him or his policies? Why do you feel the need to create figments of criminal acts via the word corruption?

The Press is supposed to be the watchdog of the American people. We need a Watchdog to make sure their doing their jobs and not simply pushing a Liberal agenda.

Holding the President accountable for his corruption, lies, and crimes by reporting on them isn't a 'liberal' agenda.

Its an American one.

They didn't hold Obama accountable for his.
They ignore what good he has done like the lowest black unemployment numbers ever. They don't report the good stuff at all. They did with Obama.

And when did Obama call the press the 'enemy of the people'? How many of Obama's national security advisers plead guilty to lying to the FBI? How many of Obama's personal lawyers implicated him in the coordination and direction of multiple federal felonies?


Never, zero and none? Then that might explain why the press didn't hold him accountable for it. Or why the Senate never found it necessary to unanimously reaffirm the freedom of the press under Obama's watch.

 

[Jantje_Smit]

Soviet Pravda worked for the State. Per your argument, the press would be working against the State...

Nah, the MSM isn't working against the state, they're working for the deep state

 

[Slyhunter]

He's already had his people float the idea that the President should have the power to shutdown any news agency the president deems is propagating 'fake news'.

With a full 43% of republicans polled supporting empowering the President to shut down any news agency that is engaged in 'bad behavior'.

Resolutions such as those passed by the Senate are necessary due to the loathsome and rampant corruption of the President and how eager many republicans are to grant the President unprecedented powers to attack the press.

Until something actual happens it's nothing but words, and no constitutional violation. Dems have been bitching about "doing something" about Fox News for a decade now with nothing actually happening, where was your angst about that?

And you keep using the word corruption without any evidence of actual corruption.

How about you just say you don't like him or his policies? Why do you feel the need to create figments of criminal acts via the word corruption?

The Press is supposed to be the watchdog of the American people. We need a Watchdog to make sure their doing their jobs and not simply pushing a Liberal agenda.

Holding the President accountable for his corruption, lies, and crimes by reporting on them isn't a 'liberal' agenda.

Its an American one.

They didn't hold Obama accountable for his.
They ignore what good he has done like the lowest black unemployment numbers ever. They don't report the good stuff at all. They did with Obama.

And when did Obama call the press the 'enemy of the people'? How many of Obama's national security advisers plead guilty to lying to the FBI? How many of Obama's personal lawyers implicated him in the coordination and direction of multiple federal felonies?


Never, zero and none? Then that might explain why the press didn't hold him accountable for it. Or why the Senate never found it necessary to unanimously reaffirm the freedom of the press under Obama's watch.

 

[Skylar]

Soviet Pravda worked for the State. Per your argument, the press would be working against the State...

Nah, the MSM isn't working against the state, they're working for the deep state

And when you say 'deep state', you mean your imagination?

Because you won't be able to polish that conspiracy turd with actual evidence.

 

[Skylar]

Until something actual happens it's nothing but words, and no constitutional violation. Dems have been bitching about "doing something" about Fox News for a decade now with nothing actually happening, where was your angst about that?

And you keep using the word corruption without any evidence of actual corruption.

How about you just say you don't like him or his policies? Why do you feel the need to create figments of criminal acts via the word corruption?

The Press is supposed to be the watchdog of the American people. We need a Watchdog to make sure their doing their jobs and not simply pushing a Liberal agenda.

Holding the President accountable for his corruption, lies, and crimes by reporting on them isn't a 'liberal' agenda.

Its an American one.

They didn't hold Obama accountable for his.
They ignore what good he has done like the lowest black unemployment numbers ever. They don't report the good stuff at all. They did with Obama.

And when did Obama call the press the 'enemy of the people'? How many of Obama's national security advisers plead guilty to lying to the FBI? How many of Obama's personal lawyers implicated him in the coordination and direction of multiple federal felonies?


Never, zero and none? Then that might explain why the press didn't hold him accountable for it. Or why the Senate never found it necessary to unanimously reaffirm the freedom of the press under Obama's watch.

And yet the Senate never found it necessary to unanimously reaffirm some of our most basic rights under Obama.

But then, Trump sycohpant Lou Dobbs hadn't yet tried to float the idea that Trump should be given the power to shut down any news agency that propagated false news.

Nor did 43% of republicans polled think that the president should be able to shut down media outlets who were engaged in 'bad behavior'.

Eliminating much of the mystery of why the Senate felt compelled to act now.

 

[Jantje_Smit]

And when you say 'deep state', you mean your imagination?

No, when I say deep state I mean the collection of corrupt and power hungry bureaucrats that have been running your so called democracy for hundreds of years. That's why the policies always stay the same, no matter who is pretzeldent or which party is power

Because you won't be able to polish that conspiracy turd with actual evidence.

Actual evidence like the CIA/FBI openly sabotaging the selections you mean? Or if you want to go further back, assassinating JFK who wanted to shatter part of the deep state into a 1,000 pieces...

You think Mueller is just a peace & democracy loving patriot wanting to protect the holy constitution? You might want to look up his past, he was part of the Bu$h junta, covering up their 9/11 crimes and happily lying about WMD (not to meantion the anthrax attacks)