Sen. Kennedy: ‘Congratulations, butthead,' you almost got a justice (Alito) killed & his family, as SCOTUS investigation fails to find draft leaker

[busybee01]

: Brazen attempts like this one to change the Court’s decisions – from within – will become more common.

The only butthead is Kennedy. It is very clear that the leak came from either Thomas or Alito's side of the aisle. The leaker was trying to stop Roberts from getting one more vote to not overturn Roe vs Wade.

 

[okfine]

Nope but consider this: their investigation did not include the justices themselves and they found nothing. By process of elimination they have incriminated one of their own.

They didn't sign affidavits when asked what they knew, but 82 others had to.

"Sworn affidavits were THE main tool that the marshal used to secure truthful statements from everyone she interviewed because lying on an affidavit is a crime," he wrote. "Yet the justices were exempt from this requirement. The marshal's justification for not making the justices sign sworn affidavits is odd. She says no 'credible leads... implicated the justices or their spouses.' OK, but surely that was true of many of the other 82 people who were interviewed. Yet they had to sign affidavits"

Did a poster in this thread say "cover up?"
Looks like that's the case.

Supreme Court Marshal interviewed justices in leak case — but didn't make them sign sworn affidavits

The Marshal of the Supreme Court on Friday released new information about her investigation into the leak of a draft decision that overturned one day after revealing that she had not determined the identity of the leaker.In the statement, Marshal Gail Curley said that she "spoke with each of the...

www.rawstory.com

 

[busybee01]

Huh? Where's the link that "we all know" Alito leaked the preliminary decision?

Alito and Thomas are the only ones who benefitted from the leak.

 

[busybee01]

Fake news.

U.S. Supreme Court defends Alito over report of second leak

The U.S. Supreme Court's legal counsel on Monday defended Justice Samuel Alito after two Democratic lawmakers demanded answers about a former anti-abortion leader's claim that he was told in advance about the outcome of a major 2014 ruling the conservative jurist wrote in a case concerning...

www.reuters.com

It is real news unlike your fake news.

 

[busybee01]

Odds the leaker was some Dem? I'd say 90%.

Democrats gained nothing in leaking it. Only Alito and Thomas benefitted.

 

[busybee01]

shorter version of the interview

Why? This threatens no one.

 

[basquebromance]

Jim Jordan: we need to find out who is the leaker so this doesn't happen again

 

[lantern2814]

Aleito leaked it himself.

Your link and proof seem to be missing fatso.

 

[lantern2814]

And, of course, after leaking it he played the victim. This is what scum like that does.

And lowlife retarded fat scum like you throw accusations like that around with zero evidence.

 

[busybee01]

Jim Jordan: we need to find out who is the leaker so this doesn't happen again

The trouble is the leaker is in the Alito/Thomas camp.

 

[basquebromance]

 

[Blaster]

Alito leaked it. Everyone knows it including this butthead.

Bullshit.