Third Party
Gold Member
- Jan 1, 2019
- 7,616
- 634
- 275
Do you have numbers to back up your claim?HA HA. You idiot! The Word you were trying to use, is BENEFICIARY, not benefactor. Benefactor is who GIVES favors, not who receives.According to the facts, white women HAVE been the prime benefactor of AA. So if you are truly objective, you understand that what you call AA, whites, more specifically white males, got for 188 years.
And your stupid post was refuted in my post that you quoted >>"No, white women have not been the prime beneficiaries of AA. that's because there are far more victimized white women, who are daughters and wives (dependents) of victimized white males, than any total of white women ever benefitting from AA."
And what you call "facts" is liberal jibberish from fake news media, slanted liberal universities and think tanks
You can't refute proven fact. White women have been the ones who have benefitted the most. So AA has increased white wealth. White men have not been victimized by the policy and you are too much of a coward to discuss the impact of 188 years of white male preference at the exclusion of all others.