Second Republican Resigns From House Freedom Caucus

[The Rabbi]

Machines are not investigated. People are. Machines are evidence in the investigation.

are you serious...there is a Forensic Investigation of the State Department servers and Clinton's server to investigate whether these were accessed by hackers....they are looking for evidence of a security leak from analyzing the Server...they are not looking for evidence to use in order to prove Clinton did something criminal...why is that hard to accept ?

And if they find it, what will that tell you?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

and immature sissies on the Left than cant admit when they are wrong will always be losers who cant admit they are wrong

You must be Studley Mckensey

 

[bedowin62]

Machines are not investigated. People are. Machines are evidence in the investigation.

are you serious...there is a Forensic Investigation of the State Department servers and Clinton's server to investigate whether these were accessed by hackers....they are looking for evidence of a security leak from analyzing the Server...they are not looking for evidence to use in order to prove Clinton did something criminal...why is that hard to accept ?

if they were found to be accesed by hackers y ou complete idiot. should somebody that illegally set up this situation be made to pay for it???

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Because you know the answer is it means Clinton negligently allowed classified material to fall into enemy hands, which is a felony.
Ding.

No it actually means she got hacked ...

 

[The Rabbi]

Because you know the answer is it means Clinton negligently allowed classified material to fall into enemy hands, which is a felony.
Ding.

No it actually means she got hacked ...

I cant believe I have to tease this out of you.
And why did she get hacked? Was it because she conducted her official business on her own unsecure server, despite gov't regulations and laws to the contrary? SOmething that would be a felony?

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

if they were found to be accesed by hackers y ou complete idiot. should somebody that illegally set up this situation be made to pay for it???

So you agree that there is no criminal Investigation of Hillary Clinton

Yes_____

NO_____


If you say No can you provide a link to a source...thanks

 

[bedowin62]

3 Federal Laws Hillary May Have Violated By Using ...
www.ijreview.com/.../264655-3-federal-laws-hillary-may-violated-secret...

• Cached

'This is an egregious violation of the law, and if it were anyone else, they could be ... “'By using a private email system, Secretary Clinton violated the Federal ... believes that the use of a personal emails server appears to be a preemptive move

 

[bedowin62]

if they were found to be accesed by hackers y ou complete idiot. should somebody that illegally set up this situation be made to pay for it???

So you agree that there is no criminal Investigation of Hillary Clinton

Yes_____

NO_____


If you say No can you provide a link to a source...thanks

look up idiot

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Because you know the answer is it means Clinton negligently allowed classified material to fall into enemy hands, which is a felony.
Ding.

No it actually means she got hacked ...

I cant believe I have to tease this out of you.
And why did she get hacked? Was it because she conducted her official business on her own unsecure server, despite gov't regulations and laws to the contrary? SOmething that would be a felony?

None of that is accurate and is more changing the subject...at this time and date Hillary Clinton is not the subject of an FBI Criminal Investigation looking to find evidence she committed crimes ...that happens to be a hard fact not an opinion...Hillary is not the Target of a Criminal probe into her behavior....

 

[bedowin62]

The fact that the email was not marked classified at the time does not excuse Mrs. Clinton. This is because information gathered from foreign government sources, a great deal of her email was so sourced, is presumed classified. Mrs Clinton received Departmental training on recognizing and handling classified materials. Presumed classified information is defined by Executive Order as "The unauthorized disclosure of foreign government information is presumed to cause damage to the national security." (see full text of that section of Executive Order 13526- Classified National Security Information, Sec. 1.1(4)(d), below)



THIS IS FROM THE DAILY KOS left-wing nutcase

hope that isnt "CORPORATE MEDIA" just pulling our chains again!!

lmao

 

[bedowin62]

Hillary Clinton's Felony. The federal laws violated by the ...
www.dailykos.com/.../-Hillary-Clinton-s-Felony-The-federal-la...

• Cached

Daily Kos
Loading...
Aug 28, 2015 - The federal laws violated by the private server ... WASHINGTON — F.B.I. agents investigating Hillary Rodham Clinton's private email server are ... It has been claimed that Hillary did not violate the law because she didn't ...

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

if they were found to be accesed by hackers y ou complete idiot. should somebody that illegally set up this situation be made to pay for it???

So you agree that there is no criminal Investigation of Hillary Clinton

Yes_____

NO_____


If you say No can you provide a link to a source...thanks

look up idiot

She "may have violated " LOl but she is not being investigated by the FBI is she ...

3 Federal Laws Hillary May Have Violated By Using ...
www.ijreview.com/.../264655-3-federal-laws-hillary-may-violated-secret...

• Cached

'This is an egregious violation of the law, and if it were anyone else, they could be ... “'By using a private email system, Secretary Clinton violated the Federal ... believes that the use of a personal emails server appears to be a preemptive move

She is not being criminally investigated .Period.

 

[bedowin62]

more Daily Kos:

On his last day in office, President Bill Clinton pardoned former CIA Director John Deutch who had committed similar violations. Deutch left the CIA on December 15, 1996 and soon after it was revealed that several of his laptop computers contained classified materials. In January 1997, the CIA began a formal security investigation of the matter. Senior management at CIA declined to fully pursue the security breach. Over two years after his departure, the matter was referred to the Department of Justice, where Attorney General Janet Reno declined prosecution. She did, however, recommend an investigation to determine whether Deutch should retain his security clearance.
All Deutch did was to take some classified material home with him to work on his unsecured personal laptops that were connected to his home commercial internet. In other words, pretty much what Hillary did on a much larger scale.
Other, lesser, federal officials have been recently prosecuted for downloading classified materials onto private servers or media and taking them home, and they were charged even though the materials was never publicly released and they had no intention to do so or to harm the United States. Links in thread: http://www.democraticunderground.com/...

 

[bedowin62]

Applicable statutes and Executive Order:
1) 18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
Full copy of this Section of the 1917 Espionage Act is below. It has been claimed that Hillary did not violate the law because she didn't intend to injure the U.S. or aid a foreign power. However, that purpose is not required to convict under this Subsections (e) and (f) of this statute.
Subsections (a)-(d) and (g)(conspiracy) reference and require intent to injure the United States. The plain-language of Subsection (e) and particularly (f) are different:
The difference is this phrase that references purpose in the first three subsections; "with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to the advantage of any foreign nation, Note: "is to be used"
The language in (e) is close but omits reference to purpose to injure: "he possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation". The word intent is not there. Note: "could be used"
Finally, the offense specified at (f) requires not willful action, simply a negligent action:

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

I now know you cannot come up with anyone claiming Clinton is the subject of an FBI criminal investigation ....you lose

 

[bedowin62]

Finally, the offense specified at (f) requires not willful action, simply a negligent action:
(1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or
(2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

 

[Siete]

3 Federal Laws Hillary May Have Violated By Using ...
www.ijreview.com/.../264655-3-federal-laws-hillary-may-violated-secret...

• Cached

'This is an egregious violation of the law, and if it were anyone else, they could be ... “'By using a private email system, Secretary Clinton violated the Federal ... believes that the use of a personal emails server appears to be a preemptive move

a 7 month old twitter link ... BBBBAAAAAWWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

WELL ! I'm convinced,

LMAO

 

[bedowin62]

I now know you cannot come up with anyone claiming Clinton is the subject of an FBI criminal investigation ....you lose

no YOU lose idiot

when they are done she is the one who will be charged with crimes.

SHE DOESNT HAVE TO HAVE KNOWN IT WAS AGAINST THE LAW

SHE DOENST HAVE TO HAVE PERSONALLY SET UP THE SERVER




keep trying....................................

 

[bedowin62]

3 Federal Laws Hillary May Have Violated By Using ...
www.ijreview.com/.../264655-3-federal-laws-hillary-may-violated-secret...

• Cached

'This is an egregious violation of the law, and if it were anyone else, they could be ... “'By using a private email system, Secretary Clinton violated the Federal ... believes that the use of a personal emails server appears to be a preemptive move

a 7 month old twitter link ... BBBBAAAAAWWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

WELL ! I'm convinced,

LMAO

is that all you got?

ur a joke. go away before i shame you some more!!

lol

 

[bedowin62]

The differences between Sections (e) and (f) and the various other offenses covered in Section 793 comes down to the element of intent to injure the US or act to the advantage of a foreign power. These are not requisite elements of the offenses covered under these sections of the Espionage Act.
2) 1950 Federal Records Act
44 U.S. Code § 3106 - Unlawful removal, destruction of records
https://www.law.cornell.edu/...
Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
The head of each Federal agency shall notify the Archivist of any actual, impending, or threatened unlawful removal, defacing, alteration, or destruction of records in the custody of the agency of which he is the head that shall come to his attention, and with the assistance of the Archivist shall initiate action through the Attorney General for the recovery of records he knows or has reason to believe have been unlawfully removed from his agency, or from another Federal agency whose records have been transferred to his legal custody. In any case in which the head of the agency does not initiate an action for such recovery or other redress within a reasonable period of time after being notified of any such unlawful action, the Archivist shall request the Attorney General to initiate such an action, and shall notify the Congress when such a request has been made.