Star
Gold Member
- Apr 5, 2009
- 2,532
- 614
- 190
.
Seattle's City Council is asking for transparency, debate and possible amendments to the treaty but possibly not, whic begs the question - why are Trans Pacific Partnership supporters afraid of transparency?
Seattle City Council unanimously opposes Trans Pacific Partnership
Mar 30, 2015
Steve Wilhelm
Staff Writer- Puget Sound Business Journal
<snip>
The vote, which has no power over the federal trade negotiations, was in favor of a resolution expressing opposition to the proposed 11-nation trade agreement.
Several city council members said they very much support trade, but they oppose an agreement that they contended could compromise Seattle’s strong stance on the environment and workers' rights.
In particular, opponents were concerned multinational corporations would have new legal pathways to go after municipalities and states that pass legislation those companies believe could compromise profits.
“What would happen if a change on minimum wage were decided by an international tribunal?” Council member Kshama Sawant said. “We have seen what NAFTA [North American Free Trade Agreement] has done...we don’t need any more evidence.”
Sawant, who has opposed the TPP, described several scenarios where corporations have used NAFTA and other trade agreements to sue governments around the world, and won.
“I believe the nation is looking at this vote today,” said Council member Nick Licata just before the vote. “We are a port city, this will send a very strong message to Washington, D.C.”
The resolution itself makes it clear the council isn't opposing trade agreements, but rather, the fact that the TPP has been negotiated in secret, and that under expected "fast track" rules, Congress will only be able to vote it up or down and not offer amendments.
"The Seattle City Council opposes 'Fast Track' authority in its current form for the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), and instead, urges the president and Congress to conduct a fully transparent and inclusive legislative process for consideration of the TPP," the resolution reads. "The Seattle City Council strongly supports fair trade practices and agreements that protect American jobs, protect workers, protect the environment, include enforceable labor and environmental standards, improve the quality of life in all signatory countries, maintain the integrity and sovereignty of our judicial system, and do not give multinational corporations excessive power to undermine national and local governmental authority to create reasonable rules and regulations."
<snip>
.
Seattle's City Council is asking for transparency, debate and possible amendments to the treaty but possibly not, whic begs the question - why are Trans Pacific Partnership supporters afraid of transparency?
Seattle City Council unanimously opposes Trans Pacific Partnership
Mar 30, 2015
Steve Wilhelm
Staff Writer- Puget Sound Business Journal
<snip>
The vote, which has no power over the federal trade negotiations, was in favor of a resolution expressing opposition to the proposed 11-nation trade agreement.
Several city council members said they very much support trade, but they oppose an agreement that they contended could compromise Seattle’s strong stance on the environment and workers' rights.
In particular, opponents were concerned multinational corporations would have new legal pathways to go after municipalities and states that pass legislation those companies believe could compromise profits.
“What would happen if a change on minimum wage were decided by an international tribunal?” Council member Kshama Sawant said. “We have seen what NAFTA [North American Free Trade Agreement] has done...we don’t need any more evidence.”
Sawant, who has opposed the TPP, described several scenarios where corporations have used NAFTA and other trade agreements to sue governments around the world, and won.
“I believe the nation is looking at this vote today,” said Council member Nick Licata just before the vote. “We are a port city, this will send a very strong message to Washington, D.C.”
The resolution itself makes it clear the council isn't opposing trade agreements, but rather, the fact that the TPP has been negotiated in secret, and that under expected "fast track" rules, Congress will only be able to vote it up or down and not offer amendments.
"The Seattle City Council opposes 'Fast Track' authority in its current form for the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), and instead, urges the president and Congress to conduct a fully transparent and inclusive legislative process for consideration of the TPP," the resolution reads. "The Seattle City Council strongly supports fair trade practices and agreements that protect American jobs, protect workers, protect the environment, include enforceable labor and environmental standards, improve the quality of life in all signatory countries, maintain the integrity and sovereignty of our judicial system, and do not give multinational corporations excessive power to undermine national and local governmental authority to create reasonable rules and regulations."
<snip>
.