Sea level potential rise doubles in new study

Really is useless to argue with the Neanderthals. They are clueless, unless it airs on FOX.
 
Why stop at double? It's just another stupid failed model, they should have said 84,000 percent increase
 
Weatherman, are you ever going to show us an actual consensus prediction by actual climate scientists that didn't happen?

No? Go fig.

I bet you can give us some more diversions and red herrings. That way, you won't have to admit you were just making it all up, and that the actual science has been pretty damn spectacular.


So where do news papers and magazine's, get their information from the past 140 years ??


God are you such, shall I say in DENIAL?



.
 
Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.

And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...









Deny what exactly? That the "study" is based entirely on computer models thus is nothing more than fiction? It is you who need to learn some basics dude.

Just sayin...

That is how science works. Or would you rather wait until Phrump tells another one of his lies. You believe him but not science. You are blissfully ignorant. ENJOY YOUR FANTASY LAND.
 
Last edited:
Engineering, science, and medicine are based on modeling. Please read a book occasionally.
 
Weatherman, are you ever going to show us an actual consensus prediction by actual climate scientists that didn't happen?

No? Go fig.

I bet you can give us some more diversions and red herrings. That way, you won't have to admit you were just making it all up, and that the actual science has been pretty damn spectacular.
I've yet to see a consensus prediction concerning the future of mankind by any group of scientists. Ever.
And please don't pull out the long debunked global warming/cooling "consensus".
 
Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.

And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...


I found it.....


Just a rethread of a 2005 UN failed perdiction.


Embarrassing Predictions Haunt the Global-Warming Industry


United Nations “Climate Refugees”

In 2005, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) warned that imminent sea-level rises, increased hurricanes, and desertification caused by “man-made global warming” would lead to massive population disruptions. In a handy map, the organization highlighted areas that were supposed to be particularly vulnerable in terms of producing “climate refugees.” Especially at risk were regions such as the Caribbean and low-lying Pacific islands, along with coastal areas.

The 2005 UNEP predictions claimed that, by 2010, some 50 million “climate refugees” would be frantically fleeing from those regions of the globe. However, not only did the areas in question fail to produce a single “climate refugee,” by 2010, population levels for those regions were actually still soaring. In many cases, the areas that were supposed to be producing waves of “climate refugees” and becoming uninhabitable turned out to be some of the fastest-growing places on Earth.

In the Bahamas, for example, according to the 2010 census, there was a major increase in population, going from around 300,000 in 2000 to more than 350,000 by 2010. The population of St. Lucia, meanwhile, grew by five percent during the same period. The Seychelles grew by about 10 percent. The Solomon Islands also witnessed a major population boom during that time frame, gaining another 100,000 people, or an increase of about 25 percent.



.
 
Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.

And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...


I found it.....


Just a rethread of a 2005 UN failed perdiction.


Embarrassing Predictions Haunt the Global-Warming Industry


United Nations “Climate Refugees”

In 2005, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) warned that imminent sea-level rises, increased hurricanes, and desertification caused by “man-made global warming” would lead to massive population disruptions. In a handy map, the organization highlighted areas that were supposed to be particularly vulnerable in terms of producing “climate refugees.” Especially at risk were regions such as the Caribbean and low-lying Pacific islands, along with coastal areas.

The 2005 UNEP predictions claimed that, by 2010, some 50 million “climate refugees” would be frantically fleeing from those regions of the globe. However, not only did the areas in question fail to produce a single “climate refugee,” by 2010, population levels for those regions were actually still soaring. In many cases, the areas that were supposed to be producing waves of “climate refugees” and becoming uninhabitable turned out to be some of the fastest-growing places on Earth.

In the Bahamas, for example, according to the 2010 census, there was a major increase in population, going from around 300,000 in 2000 to more than 350,000 by 2010. The population of St. Lucia, meanwhile, grew by five percent during the same period. The Seychelles grew by about 10 percent. The Solomon Islands also witnessed a major population boom during that time frame, gaining another 100,000 people, or an increase of about 25 percent.



.
Yep, 50 million people who's homes were destroyed by climate change.
We just can't find them.
 
Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.

And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...


I found it.....


Just a rethread of a 2005 UN failed perdiction.


Embarrassing Predictions Haunt the Global-Warming Industry


United Nations “Climate Refugees”

In 2005, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) warned that imminent sea-level rises, increased hurricanes, and desertification caused by “man-made global warming” would lead to massive population disruptions. In a handy map, the organization highlighted areas that were supposed to be particularly vulnerable in terms of producing “climate refugees.” Especially at risk were regions such as the Caribbean and low-lying Pacific islands, along with coastal areas.

The 2005 UNEP predictions claimed that, by 2010, some 50 million “climate refugees” would be frantically fleeing from those regions of the globe. However, not only did the areas in question fail to produce a single “climate refugee,” by 2010, population levels for those regions were actually still soaring. In many cases, the areas that were supposed to be producing waves of “climate refugees” and becoming uninhabitable turned out to be some of the fastest-growing places on Earth.

In the Bahamas, for example, according to the 2010 census, there was a major increase in population, going from around 300,000 in 2000 to more than 350,000 by 2010. The population of St. Lucia, meanwhile, grew by five percent during the same period. The Seychelles grew by about 10 percent. The Solomon Islands also witnessed a major population boom during that time frame, gaining another 100,000 people, or an increase of about 25 percent.



.
Yep, 50 million people who's homes were destroyed by climate change.
We just can't find them.


Its ok in 2020 then in 2040 , then in 2060..... they will just copy and paste the same report just change the dates like a bad romance novel.
 
Really is useless to argue with the Neanderthals. They are clueless, unless it airs on FOX.
NO.. what is useless, are morons like you who believe everything your masters tell you to spew.

Lets look at your OP. The author of the paper used the Nansen Geophysical Modeling program. A program which no scientist with credibility uses today because it is so badly flawed that its outputs are fringe every time. The model has NO PREDICTIVE POWERS AND IS COMMONLY WRONG BY MAGNITUDES greater than X10.

The Predictions won't come to pass no matter how many times you spout this crap. Just one more left wing hack masquerading as a scientist.
 
Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.

And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...


I found it.....


Just a rethread of a 2005 UN failed perdiction.


Embarrassing Predictions Haunt the Global-Warming Industry


United Nations “Climate Refugees”

In 2005, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) warned that imminent sea-level rises, increased hurricanes, and desertification caused by “man-made global warming” would lead to massive population disruptions. In a handy map, the organization highlighted areas that were supposed to be particularly vulnerable in terms of producing “climate refugees.” Especially at risk were regions such as the Caribbean and low-lying Pacific islands, along with coastal areas.

The 2005 UNEP predictions claimed that, by 2010, some 50 million “climate refugees” would be frantically fleeing from those regions of the globe. However, not only did the areas in question fail to produce a single “climate refugee,” by 2010, population levels for those regions were actually still soaring. In many cases, the areas that were supposed to be producing waves of “climate refugees” and becoming uninhabitable turned out to be some of the fastest-growing places on Earth.

In the Bahamas, for example, according to the 2010 census, there was a major increase in population, going from around 300,000 in 2000 to more than 350,000 by 2010. The population of St. Lucia, meanwhile, grew by five percent during the same period. The Seychelles grew by about 10 percent. The Solomon Islands also witnessed a major population boom during that time frame, gaining another 100,000 people, or an increase of about 25 percent.



.
Yep, 50 million people who's homes were destroyed by climate change.
We just can't find them.


Its ok in 2020 then in 2040 , then in 2060..... they will just copy and paste the same report just change the dates like a bad romance novel.

A Cut and Paste job... They can hire Old Crock. He's really good at that kind of crap..

The real problem is they are already doing it today. This OP is just a copy and paste job using a bad model from the Gore predictions 16 years ago.
 
There is one major difference between leftist and religious doomsday scenarios. The religious readily acknowledge that their doomsday scenario is built entirely on faith. The left, on the other hand, claims that its doomsday scenarios are entirely built on science.

That there is little truth to the left-wing claim is not as important as the fact that these doomsday scenarios have undermined the status of science. How many scientists have been compromised by their joining the research-money and fame bandwagons of left-wing apocalyptic predictions? And how has this affected the public’s perceptions of science and scientists when it comes to contentious issues?
 
Engineering, science, and medicine are based on modeling. Please read a book occasionally.
Just like the models of just a year ago said El Niño would likely bring significant precipitation to SoCal.
And what we got was another drought year.
Go figure, manmade computer models wrong again.

As opposed to computer models by something/someone else? So, how do you make predictions or projections without models Mr Weatherman?
 
Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.

And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...
Name one prediction of the left in the past 50 years to come true.
World starvation.
Heterosexual HIV epidemic.
World overpopulation.
Silicone breast implants.
Ozone layer disappears.
New Ice Age coming.
New world tropical age.

How about predictions of science that have come true? You have an obvious reality disconnect here. You aren't arguing with the left. You're arguing with mainstream science.

World's Fair: Isaac Asimov's predictions 50 years on - BBC News

Good one!!! :lmao:
Do you write your own stuff?
 

Forum List

Back
Top