drsmith1072
Senior Member
- Jul 30, 2009
- 6,031
- 250
- 48
Cancelling moves Doyle had no right to commit to and recording correct figures is not increasing the deficit.
It is recording correct figures.
Walker's fix naturally and appropriately moved ahead from there.
It's called PROOF go find some if you are going to make unsubstantiated claims like that. How is your own source not correct?
The fact is that YOUR OWN source admits that walkers administration "added" to the projected number by cancelling cuts proposed by the last adminstration in their previous budget and passing tax cuts and yet you still have yet to address the content of YOUR OWN source. Why is that?
How is it wrong?? Please explain if you can?
I have already explained.
You come into this thread knowing only the $137 million number. We give you some more facts about the situation. They are so foreign to you that you demand a link before you will accept them. I do the legwork and find a good analysis for you. You read the report in the exact opposite sense to which it was intended.
For you to have gone from last February until yesterday in ignorance of even the fact that the deficit Walker faced measured in the billions says something about your willingness or ability to learn about current events.
For you to have only learned about the billions yesterday and then to act as if you understand the situation better than me or even than the Journal Sentinel / Politifact analyst shows me that I cannot compete with the preconceptions which are fixed in your mind.
I've tried to help, and now I'm done. You can call this running away. I call it recognizing an exercise in futility and responding sanely.
/unsubscribe
Good thing I demanded a link or else your line of bs would have gone unquestioned. LOL Oh and I guess that means that you can't explain how YOUR OWN source is wrong??
Calling me names again and you still have yet to address the content of your own source. How sad is that?
Furthermore, running away will not change the FACT that your own source counters your spin and instead of having the integrity to admit your shortcomings you avoid facts that counter your spin and personally attack anyone who dares question your unsubstantiated OPINIONS.
Why is it so hard for you to grasp the actual content of your own source and why is it that you refuse to even discuss it??
For the past few pages of your replies none have offered anything of substance, since I showed how your own source countered your spin, and they have predominantly consisted of you calling me names and now that you are officially turning tail and running away from your own source you engage in dishonesty and claim that you tried to explain your arguments when nothing could be further from the truth.
Thanks for showing that you have no integrity and nothing valid to offer.
Last edited: