Scott Walker Emerges Front Runner. So Debbie Wasserman, Who Is The Hair Pulling Coward Now?

I dont see Scott Walker as the typical front runner of a race two years ahead of time, I am pretty sure he will stay in the top three till the end. It looks like Cruz/Walker/Paul and maybe Rubio in the end. I dont see Bush winning any primaries.

I agree that Walker will hang in, barring some controversy. However, whatever the polls start saying month to month, Jeb has become the GOP frontrunner and historically, that makes it very likely he'll pull out the nomination.

Rubio's a nice guy, but he's so awkward in public, and that SOTU response will follow him where ever he goes. I honestly don't see him even throwing his hat in.
Just wait, as they keep taking polls in early primary states, you will always see Walker on top, i just read that Walker is already ahead in New Hampshire.

You know, I don't even really doubt we'll see him hold on to his lead for a while. I'm just not convinced it represents any real long-term support among the primary voters. We're talking about someone who was nearly recalled a few years ago, and don't think that won't come back to haunt him as the race matures.
 
I dont see Scott Walker as the typical front runner of a race two years ahead of time, I am pretty sure he will stay in the top three till the end. It looks like Cruz/Walker/Paul and maybe Rubio in the end. I dont see Bush winning any primaries.

I agree that Walker will hang in, barring some controversy. However, whatever the polls start saying month to month, Jeb has become the GOP frontrunner and historically, that makes it very likely he'll pull out the nomination.

Rubio's a nice guy, but he's so awkward in public, and that SOTU response will follow him where ever he goes. I honestly don't see him even throwing his hat in.
Just wait, as they keep taking polls in early primary states, you will always see Walker on top, i just read that Walker is already ahead in New Hampshire.

You know, I don't even really doubt we'll see him hold on to his lead for a while. I'm just not convinced it represents any real long-term support among the primary voters. We're talking about someone who was nearly recalled a few years ago, and don't think that won't come back to haunt him as the race matures.
Lets see if MSNBC eventually starts making false accusations of Scott, despite that they will have no evidence to back up any claims.
 
I dont see Scott Walker as the typical front runner of a race two years ahead of time, I am pretty sure he will stay in the top three till the end. It looks like Cruz/Walker/Paul and maybe Rubio in the end. I dont see Bush winning any primaries.

I agree that Walker will hang in, barring some controversy. However, whatever the polls start saying month to month, Jeb has become the GOP frontrunner and historically, that makes it very likely he'll pull out the nomination.

Rubio's a nice guy, but he's so awkward in public, and that SOTU response will follow him where ever he goes. I honestly don't see him even throwing his hat in.
Just wait, as they keep taking polls in early primary states, you will always see Walker on top, i just read that Walker is already ahead in New Hampshire.

You know, I don't even really doubt we'll see him hold on to his lead for a while. I'm just not convinced it represents any real long-term support among the primary voters. We're talking about someone who was nearly recalled a few years ago, and don't think that won't come back to haunt him as the race matures.
Lets see if MSNBC eventually starts making false accusations of Scott, despite that they will have no evidence to back up any claims.

lol, maybe? The real damage to Walker will be done by his rival contenders in the primary. He won't even have to worry about MSNBC unless he gets the nomination, when he'd have to broaden his appeal beyond just the Republican base.
 
:oops-28: Anyone laughing at Debbie Wasserman this week? And where is she hiding now as her punching bag has taken a commanding lead in "All Credible GOP Polls"? She probably took the left wing fabricated polls seriously that had Jeb Bush as the clear front runner. She probably then figured, hey, looks like Jeb Bush is going to be the nominee and Hillary will beat that hair-pulling conservative in 2016. So where is she now? why isn't she on any cable news program trying to explain the sudden (but not unexpected surge) of Scott Walker? This would be like Obama trying to explain the failure of Obama-Care and Gruber-Gate.:hellno:

Scott Walker is only surging in Iowa, which he should be, he's from a neighboring state.

Now, frankly, I think that Walker would be a pretty good candidate for the GOP. at least on paper, he looks pretty good.

(Then again, on paper, Sarah Palin looked pretty good. So there's that.)

the Establishment for some bizarre reason wants Jeb Bush. I have no idea why. I had no idea why they wanted Romney or McCain, for that matter.

Scott Walker would be a fun candidate, especially the part where all the RWnuts try to explain to us why ZERO foreign policy experience no longer matters.

Zero foreign policy experience didn't stop you clowns from voting for Obama.

Not to mention, zero executive experience.....

So you admit that voting for any GOP'er with zero foreign policy experience will make you a clown. lol, you're already a clown;

I guess then you'd be doubling down on your clownitude.
 
well, no one in the Obama team has any foreign policy experience either, well, maybe Biden, he did fly around Europe alot.
 
well, no one in the Obama team has any foreign policy experience either, well, maybe Biden, he did fly around Europe alot.

Assuming for sake of argument that was true, was that sufficient reason to disqualify him from being president?
I have never been to Austria, speak very little Austrian, but hey, I am interested in the job of Ambassador.
 
If there is a high turnout he won't carry his, and mine home state. He is polarizing and has fallen far short of the jobs he promised. And minimum wage does not qualify for a job. The state is a mess right now.
 
:oops-28: Anyone laughing at Debbie Wasserman this week? And where is she hiding now as her punching bag has taken a commanding lead in "All Credible GOP Polls"? She probably took the left wing fabricated polls seriously that had Jeb Bush as the clear front runner. She probably then figured, hey, looks like Jeb Bush is going to be the nominee and Hillary will beat that hair-pulling conservative in 2016. So where is she now? why isn't she on any cable news program trying to explain the sudden (but not unexpected surge) of Scott Walker? This would be like Obama trying to explain the failure of Obama-Care and Gruber-Gate.:hellno:

Scott Walker is only surging in Iowa, which he should be, he's from a neighboring state.

Now, frankly, I think that Walker would be a pretty good candidate for the GOP. at least on paper, he looks pretty good.

(Then again, on paper, Sarah Palin looked pretty good. So there's that.)

the Establishment for some bizarre reason wants Jeb Bush. I have no idea why. I had no idea why they wanted Romney or McCain, for that matter.

Scott Walker would be a fun candidate, especially the part where all the RWnuts try to explain to us why ZERO foreign policy experience no longer matters.
ANd the Dems can explain why Obama was somehow different. Zero foreign policy. Zero domestic policy. Zero administrative experience.
Least qualified president ever.
 
Walker is leading in Tea Party wack central and such is big news?

He will be gone after NH.

Oh, I don't know.

Look, guy, your boy Christie just pissed himself with the vaccine comments. He's done.

And if the Establishment nominates Jeb, they DESERVE to lose.

Frankly, Walker is a guy both the Establishment and Tea Party can probably live with. If we were looking for a compromise candidate, he'd be the guy.
 
You are a far wack atheist Dem, so we give that the credit it deserves: nothing. :lol:
 
Oh, I don't know.

Look, guy, your boy Christie just pissed himself with the vaccine comments. He's done.

And if the Establishment nominates Jeb, they DESERVE to lose.

Frankly, Walker is a guy both the Establishment and Tea Party can probably live with. If we were looking for a compromise candidate, he'd be the guy.

Why you old heart-breaker.

Somewhere in a basement in Utah a child in red pajamas (with feet) sobs but in a rare outbreak of wisdom refrains from emulating his Messiah and doesn't kick his little heels on the floor until they bleed.

I guess that's progress......
 
:oops-28: Anyone laughing at Debbie Wasserman this week? And where is she hiding now as her punching bag has taken a commanding lead in "All Credible GOP Polls"? She probably took the left wing fabricated polls seriously that had Jeb Bush as the clear front runner. She probably then figured, hey, looks like Jeb Bush is going to be the nominee and Hillary will beat that hair-pulling conservative in 2016. So where is she now? why isn't she on any cable news program trying to explain the sudden (but not unexpected surge) of Scott Walker? This would be like Obama trying to explain the failure of Obama-Care and Gruber-Gate.:hellno:

Scott Walker is only surging in Iowa, which he should be, he's from a neighboring state.

Now, frankly, I think that Walker would be a pretty good candidate for the GOP. at least on paper, he looks pretty good.

(Then again, on paper, Sarah Palin looked pretty good. So there's that.)

the Establishment for some bizarre reason wants Jeb Bush. I have no idea why. I had no idea why they wanted Romney or McCain, for that matter.

Scott Walker would be a fun candidate, especially the part where all the RWnuts try to explain to us why ZERO foreign policy experience no longer matters.
ANd the Dems can explain why Obama was somehow different. Zero foreign policy. Zero domestic policy. Zero administrative experience.
Least qualified president ever.

is Obama in this contest?
 
:oops-28: Anyone laughing at Debbie Wasserman this week? And where is she hiding now as her punching bag has taken a commanding lead in "All Credible GOP Polls"? She probably took the left wing fabricated polls seriously that had Jeb Bush as the clear front runner. She probably then figured, hey, looks like Jeb Bush is going to be the nominee and Hillary will beat that hair-pulling conservative in 2016. So where is she now? why isn't she on any cable news program trying to explain the sudden (but not unexpected surge) of Scott Walker? This would be like Obama trying to explain the failure of Obama-Care and Gruber-Gate.:hellno:

Debbie Wasserman Schultz may still be busy fighting breast cancer.
 
I dont see Scott Walker as the typical front runner of a race two years ahead of time, I am pretty sure he will stay in the top three till the end. It looks like Cruz/Walker/Paul and maybe Rubio in the end. I dont see Bush winning any primaries.

I agree that Walker will hang in, barring some controversy. However, whatever the polls start saying month to month, Jeb has become the GOP frontrunner and historically, that makes it very likely he'll pull out the nomination.

Rubio's a nice guy, but he's so awkward in public, and that SOTU response will follow him where ever he goes. I honestly don't see him even throwing his hat in.
Just wait, as they keep taking polls in early primary states, you will always see Walker on top, i just read that Walker is already ahead in New Hampshire.

You know, I don't even really doubt we'll see him hold on to his lead for a while. I'm just not convinced it represents any real long-term support among the primary voters. We're talking about someone who was nearly recalled a few years ago, and don't think that won't come back to haunt him as the race matures.
"Nearly recalled"? No, idiot. He won the recall election with more votes than he was initially elected with.
Geez. If it werent for misinformation libs would have no information at all.
 
:oops-28: Anyone laughing at Debbie Wasserman this week? And where is she hiding now as her punching bag has taken a commanding lead in "All Credible GOP Polls"? She probably took the left wing fabricated polls seriously that had Jeb Bush as the clear front runner. She probably then figured, hey, looks like Jeb Bush is going to be the nominee and Hillary will beat that hair-pulling conservative in 2016. So where is she now? why isn't she on any cable news program trying to explain the sudden (but not unexpected surge) of Scott Walker? This would be like Obama trying to explain the failure of Obama-Care and Gruber-Gate.:hellno:

Scott Walker is only surging in Iowa, which he should be, he's from a neighboring state.

Now, frankly, I think that Walker would be a pretty good candidate for the GOP. at least on paper, he looks pretty good.

(Then again, on paper, Sarah Palin looked pretty good. So there's that.)

the Establishment for some bizarre reason wants Jeb Bush. I have no idea why. I had no idea why they wanted Romney or McCain, for that matter.

Scott Walker would be a fun candidate, especially the part where all the RWnuts try to explain to us why ZERO foreign policy experience no longer matters.

Zero Foreign Policy Experience?

So you feel that governors have no experience in dealing with states other then their own?


ROFLMNAO!

Reader: You can NOT MAKE THIS CRAP UP!
:cuckoo:
 
well, no one in the Obama team has any foreign policy experience either, well, maybe Biden, he did fly around Europe alot.

Assuming for sake of argument that was true, was that sufficient reason to disqualify him from being president?
I have never been to Austria, speak very little Austrian, but hey, I am interested in the job of Ambassador.
You speak very little Austrian? Could you show us what Austrian it is you speak? I'm not familiar with that language. Thank you. :eusa_angel:

:confused-84: Is it anything like speaking Mexican? Do you speak a little Mexican?
 

Forum List

Back
Top