Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Net jobs are up in WI. You obviously didnt read the thread that discussed this.You understand WI has tremendous job growth and the way they count it is the only thing that makes it look bad, right? This was all laid out in another thread.
It appears that Walker uses the same methodology as Obama, thusly Wisconsin's unemployment rate dropped from 7.6 to 6.8. But the net job gain/job lost was -24,000.
Net jobs are up in WI. You obviously didnt read the thread that discussed this.You understand WI has tremendous job growth and the way they count it is the only thing that makes it look bad, right? This was all laid out in another thread.
It appears that Walker uses the same methodology as Obama, thusly Wisconsin's unemployment rate dropped from 7.6 to 6.8. But the net job gain/job lost was -24,000.
He doesn't. Quite the opposite. He hates unions which are sucking hardworking taxpayers dry.
Flat wages are sucking the Middle Class dry. And as historical facts show, as goes the unions, goes the Middle Class.
First, wages aren't flat. Second, with only 7% of private sector workers in unions it is illogical that they should represent the entire middle class.
He doesn't. Quite the opposite. He hates unions which are sucking hardworking taxpayers dry.
Flat wages are sucking the Middle Class dry. And as historicak facts show, as goes the unions, goes the Middle Class.
First, wages aren't flat. Second, with only 7% of private sector workers in unions it is illogical that they should represent the entire middle class.
Why does he hate working people so much?
Flat wages are sucking the Middle Class dry. And as historical facts show, as goes the unions, goes the Middle Class.
First, wages aren't flat. Second, with only 7% of private sector workers in unions it is illogical that they should represent the entire middle class.
And arrogant presumption that the Unions portend to speak for all of us...
yes, really. There is a whole thread explaining this.Net jobs are up in WI. You obviously didnt read the thread that discussed this.It appears that Walker uses the same methodology as Obama, thusly Wisconsin's unemployment rate dropped from 7.6 to 6.8. But the net job gain/job lost was -24,000.
Really?
Over the year, 27 states and the district experienced statistically
significant increases in employment. The largest increase occurred
in Texas (+245,700), followed by California (+181,000) and New York
(+155,300). Wisconsin was the only state to show a statistically
significant decrease (-23,900). (See table D.
Regional and State Employment and Unemployment Summary
yes, really. There is a whole thread explaining this.Net jobs are up in WI. You obviously didnt read the thread that discussed this.
Really?
Over the year, 27 states and the district experienced statistically
significant increases in employment. The largest increase occurred
in Texas (+245,700), followed by California (+181,000) and New York
(+155,300). Wisconsin was the only state to show a statistically
significant decrease (-23,900). (See table D.
Regional and State Employment and Unemployment Summary
yes, really. There is a whole thread explaining this.Net jobs are up in WI. You obviously didnt read the thread that discussed this.
Really?
Over the year, 27 states and the district experienced statistically
significant increases in employment. The largest increase occurred
in Texas (+245,700), followed by California (+181,000) and New York
(+155,300). Wisconsin was the only state to show a statistically
significant decrease (-23,900). (See table D.
Regional and State Employment and Unemployment Summary
yes, really. There is a whole thread explaining this.Really?
Over the year, 27 states and the district experienced statistically
significant increases in employment. The largest increase occurred
in Texas (+245,700), followed by California (+181,000) and New York
(+155,300). Wisconsin was the only state to show a statistically
significant decrease (-23,900). (See table D.
Regional and State Employment and Unemployment Summary
Being as I don't live on these boards, I missed that thread. So would someone explain to me why the BLS data is wrong? Thank you.
yes, really. There is a whole thread explaining this.Really?
Over the year, 27 states and the district experienced statistically
significant increases in employment. The largest increase occurred
in Texas (+245,700), followed by California (+181,000) and New York
(+155,300). Wisconsin was the only state to show a statistically
significant decrease (-23,900). (See table D.
Regional and State Employment and Unemployment Summary
Being as I don't live on these boards, I missed that thread. So would someone explain to me why the BLS data is wrong? Thank you.
yes, really. There is a whole thread explaining this.Really?
Over the year, 27 states and the district experienced statistically
significant increases in employment. The largest increase occurred
in Texas (+245,700), followed by California (+181,000) and New York
(+155,300). Wisconsin was the only state to show a statistically
significant decrease (-23,900). (See table D.
Regional and State Employment and Unemployment Summary
Is that anything like the whole thread that explained Sarah Palin was right about Paul Revere?
yes, really. There is a whole thread explaining this.
Being as I don't live on these boards, I missed that thread. So would someone explain to me why the BLS data is wrong? Thank you.
According to right-wingers the BLS data is wrong because Walker says so
No need to show us that you do believe what I say you believe .Being as I don't live on these boards, I missed that thread. So would someone explain to me why the BLS data is wrong? Thank you.
According to right-wingers the BLS data is wrong because Walker says so
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/223736-wisconsins-three-handed-economist-losing-jobs-gaining-employment.html#post5287104
Walker explains divide, conquer strategy - Yahoo! News
MADISON, Wis. (AP) Newly-released documentary film footage shows embattled Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker shortly after his election describing a "divide and conquer" strategy for taking on unions by first going after public employees' collective bargaining rights.
<more>
Where in the Constitution are such 'rights'?
Walker explains divide, conquer strategy - Yahoo! News
MADISON, Wis. (AP) Newly-released documentary film footage shows embattled Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker shortly after his election describing a "divide and conquer" strategy for taking on unions by first going after public employees' collective bargaining rights.
<more>
Where in the Constitution are such 'rights'?
The First Amendment.
Ever read it?
Where in the Constitution are such 'rights'?
The First Amendment.
Ever read it?
"Collective Bargaining Clause" Gracie?
I must've missed it...
Where in the Constitution are such 'rights'?
The First Amendment.
Ever read it?
"Collective Bargaining Clause" Gracie?
I must've missed it...
They can assemble all they like...they don't however have the right to dictate to anyone especially since they are a clear minority.The First Amendment.
Ever read it?
"Collective Bargaining Clause" Gracie?
I must've missed it...
What you missed was the right to assemble
