Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nobody with a lick of sense thought that the corruption of science by politics was going to remain confined to the anthropocentric Goebbels warming hoax, did they?I have an astronomer friend who told me years ago that unless your research is going to support the accepted status quo, you are refused any telescope time. The worlds telescopes are controlled by people with an agenda. That’s about as anti-science as you can get. This just supports what she said:
Scientists questioning Big Bang theory protest censorship of their work.
This also raises the question: who are the real anti-intellectuals and science deniers?
Cite an example of both sides demanding the other side must never be heard and must be crushed.Depends on which side of the divide you are on. Each side will give you a different answer. And both will probably be wrong
As with any science...I have an astronomer friend who told me years ago that unless your research is going to support the accepted status quo, you are refused any telescope time. The worlds telescopes are controlled by people with an agenda. That’s about as anti-science as you can get. This just supports what she said:
Scientists questioning Big Bang theory protest censorship of their work.
Science is not about censorship and suppression of alternative ideas. I know that’s shocking news, but it’s true.As with any science...
Given enough compelling evidence and argument, it cannot be hidden or squashed.
So far, these two scientists have not made much headway, as their methods have been repeatedly dismantled by peer review.
That doesn't mean they don't have valid research now. But there are thousands of journals they can publish in. They are trying to publish before their work is reviewed (understandable, given the poor results of the peer review of some of their other work).
But science is about peer review of methods. And they are complaining that they can't publish prior to peer review. Tough shit. Get your shit together and submit for review.Science is not about censorship and suppression of alternative ideas. I know that’s shocking news, but it’s true.
I’m not shocked you support the suppression of science to push a narrative.But science is about peer review of methods. And they are complaining that they can't publish prior to peer review. Tough shit. Get your shit together and submit for review.
And I am not shocked you have to lie to yourself out loud and prop up a strawman in order to have anything to say, even in your own thread.I’m not shocked you support the suppression of science to push a narrative.
Denying scientists access to equipment and facilities simply because their theories don’t align with the narrative is obviously a ‘science’ you support.And I am not shocked you have to lie to yourself out loud and prop up a strawman in order to have anything to say, even in your own thread.
Dude, you should pretty much never open your mouth about any scientific topic ever again.
Which isn't what happened here. This is you just pulling stuff out of your ass.Denying scientists access to equipment and facilities simply because their theories don’t align with the narrative is obviously a ‘science’ you support.
Yeah, all those scientists put their careers in jeopardy by signing a complaint because…..Which isn't what happened here. This is you just pulling stuff out of your ass.
Furthermore, plenty of scientists are publishing challenges to notions of the big bang theory, and even challenges to accepted notions of gravity and ideas about dark matter.
But you got spoonfed a blog you don't even understand about these two guys and thought you dug up a golden turd.
Sad.
24 of them signing something did not jeopardize their careers and also is just not very compelling. That's another lie you just pulled out of your ass.Yeah, all those scientists put their careers in jeopardy by signing a complaint because…..
Hilarious. Yeah, publicly attacking people who control your career has no negative consequences.24 of them signing something did not jeopardize their careers and also is just not very compelling. That's another lie you just pulled out of your ass.
Donyou even remember how not to lie? I don't think you do. Little boy lost.
Also not at all what happened here.Hilarious. Yeah, publicly attacking people who control your career has no negative consequences.
In the first post above: Scientists questioning Big Bang theory protest censorship of their work.Cite an example of both sides demanding the other side must never be heard and must be crushed.
