Scientists Find "Man-made Climate Change Doesn't Exist In Practice"

[Billy_Bob]

Scientists Find "Man-made Climate Change Doesn't Exist In Practice"

This is hilarious... We now have THREE papers which show mans contribution to be just 1/10 of one degree C. This means the impact we might have is within the Margin Of Error of our monitoring systems ability to detect... Or in layman's terms it equals ZERO...

“During the last hundred years the temperature increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The human contribution was about 0.01°C”, the Finnish researchers bluntly state in one among a series of papers.

"This has been collaborated by a team at Kobe University in Japan, which has furthered the Finnish researchers' theory: "New evidence suggests that high-energy particles from space known as galactic cosmic rays affect the Earth's climate by increasing cloud cover, causing an 'umbrella effect'," the just published study has found, a summary of which has been released in the journal Science Daily. The findings are hugely significant given this 'umbrella effect' — an entirely natural occurrence — could be the prime driver of climate warming, and not man-made factors."


I'm speechless..

We did the math here in this forum and came up with the same result... Now its published in reputable journals and peer reviewed.. AGW is dying a sorted death and there is nowhere for these charlton's to hide....

 

[emilynghiem]

Basically it was explained to me that the percentage of warming effect
from man-made activities was 20% compared with 80% from natural
causes such as volcanic activity and other radiation from natural sources.

Of the 20% that can be attributed to manmade activities,
just the part coming from AGRICULTURAL tilling of soil and other
production to feed the world's populations could not be stopped
without people starving to death. And even if humans did all
the reforms and changes called for by corporate climate change
at a cost of trillions of dollars, that would only affect 2% out of the 20%
that humans could do something about. So only 2% is not going to
be worth spending trillions.

Another friend basically explained that ALL HUMANS would have
to agree to shut down ALL activity when the sun goes down,
and only operate while the sun is up, during normal daylight hours,
to get back on track with NATURAL cycles and limits on energy consumption.

So between people giving up their material comfort and lifestyles/conveniences,
and stopping all food production and agricultural activity,
this isn't likely going to happen. People need their food and their activities/lifestyle
they are used to.

What we CAN do is agree to stop pollution and chemical/plastic waste
from contaminating our water sources and air.

We can AGREE to stop deforestation and damage to wildlife,
wilderness and ecosystems.

At the VERY least we should be in harmony and not pollute the
resources AROUND us. If we work on that, that's plenty to work on.

Any other mass changes that require revamping clean energy
and environment can come FROM that concerted effort to
at least stop pollution and destruction of natural resources.

 

[SSDD]

What we CAN do is agree to stop pollution and chemical/plastic waste
from contaminating our water sources and air.

We can AGREE to stop deforestation and damage to wildlife,
wilderness and ecosystems.

At the VERY least we should be in harmony and not pollute the
resources AROUND us. If we work on that, that's plenty to work on.

Any other mass changes that require revamping clean energy
and environment can come FROM that concerted effort to
at least stop pollution and destruction of natural resources.

Pollution, land use, deforestation, proper stewardship of wildlife....all valid environmental issues, which have actual solutions. Unfortunately, so long as the man made climate scam is sucking all the air out of the room, and all the treasure out of the coffers, nothing is going to be done about any of them....Hell leftists have decided that it is perfectly acceptable to drive raptors, bats and migratory birds to extinction with wind farms in the name of their religion....pseudoscientists are suffering from PTSD in the face of their scam falling apart before their very eyes...till this scam is put to bed, no real progress is going to be made on any of the serious environmental issues facing the world today.

 

[SSDD]

Scientists Find "Man-made Climate Change Doesn't Exist In Practice"

This is hilarious... We now have THREE papers which show mans contribution to be just 1/10 of one degree C. This means the impact we might have is within the Margin Of Error of our monitoring systems ability to detect... Or in layman's terms it equals ZERO...

“During the last hundred years the temperature increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The human contribution was about 0.01°C”, the Finnish researchers bluntly state in one among a series of papers.

"This has been collaborated by a team at Kobe University in Japan, which has furthered the Finnish researchers' theory: "New evidence suggests that high-energy particles from space known as galactic cosmic rays affect the Earth's climate by increasing cloud cover, causing an 'umbrella effect'," the just published study has found, a summary of which has been released in the journal Science Daily. The findings are hugely significant given this 'umbrella effect' — an entirely natural occurrence — could be the prime driver of climate warming, and not man-made factors."


I'm speechless..

We did the math here in this forum and came up with the same result... Now its published in reputable journals and peer reviewed.. AGW is dying a sorted death and there is nowhere for these charlton's to hide....

It is good to see that real science, based on measurement, and observation is finally getting through the gatekeepers...at first it was a few here and there and now it is becoming a veritable flood.

I think the real end of AGW is in sight and within the grasp of science at this point...I think the tipping point will happen when mikey mann has to release his work...it will take about a new york minute to discredit it, forcing a retraction, and rendering the literally thousands of papers which relied on the validity of his work moot.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Another friend basically explained that ALL HUMANS would have
to agree to shut down ALL activity when the sun goes down,
and only operate while the sun is up, during normal daylight hours,
to get back on track with NATURAL cycles and limits on energy consumption.

In our modern world this isn't going to happen. We need reliable 24/7/365 power, wind and solar are not it..

 

[Dekster]

Another friend basically explained that ALL HUMANS would have
to agree to shut down ALL activity when the sun goes down,
and only operate while the sun is up, during normal daylight hours,
to get back on track with NATURAL cycles and limits on energy consumption.

In our modern world this isn't going to happen. We need reliable 24/7/365 power, wind and solar are not it..

With modest lifestyle changes, we could get by with a lot less electric at night as consumers. Businesses are the ones that need the 24/7 stuff.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Another friend basically explained that ALL HUMANS would have
to agree to shut down ALL activity when the sun goes down,
and only operate while the sun is up, during normal daylight hours,
to get back on track with NATURAL cycles and limits on energy consumption.

In our modern world this isn't going to happen. We need reliable 24/7/365 power, wind and solar are not it..

With modest lifestyle changes, we could get by with a lot less electric at night as consumers. Businesses are the ones that need the 24/7 stuff.

Very few people in todays technology world are willing to cut back.

 

[Billy_Bob]

The lack of left wing sycophants replying to this thread is stunning... Facts disprove the AGW meme and you simply can not dispute that..

 

[Dekster]

Another friend basically explained that ALL HUMANS would have
to agree to shut down ALL activity when the sun goes down,
and only operate while the sun is up, during normal daylight hours,
to get back on track with NATURAL cycles and limits on energy consumption.

In our modern world this isn't going to happen. We need reliable 24/7/365 power, wind and solar are not it..

With modest lifestyle changes, we could get by with a lot less electric at night as consumers. Businesses are the ones that need the 24/7 stuff.

Very few people in todays technology world are willing to cut back.

I don't disagree about that, but it could be done. I posted the other day a thread which I don't think anybody commented on in environmental sub that digital technology alone accounts for more green house gas than civil aviation and it is expected to reach the same level of emissions as cars currently do by 2025. People aren't giving up their texts and their online free porn to save anything, including the people who profess to be enlightened and camp out attacking anybody who denies AGW. For most of them, this is a "I'm better than you because I believe" game and not a real commitment to the environment. Worst polluters by far are left-leaning urban areas who simply are finding new ways to export their pollution and then blame their victims.