Science Humor...Funny Because Sadly,....it is True

[skookerasbil]

You know how they say that people on the far left have absolutely zero in terms of laughing and having fun = they are always miserable.

Check out the posts.......pick any thread in this forum........what you see is pronounced levels of angst and mental meltdowns laced with constant personal attacks.


Go check it out!!!

 

[PredFan]

I've made a LOT of predictions here and on the other forum over the past 8 years.

And you've failed hard with every one. On the plus side, at least you're consistent.

That's one reason why the whole planet defines you and your cult as a sad joke. Other reasons are your delusional proclamations of victory, your constant conspiracy whining, and the way you insta-parrot all of your cult's dogma.

It will never get better for any of you denier fringe cultists. The world will keep laughing at you, when it's not ignoring you. I hope the emotional validation you all obtain from your cult affiliation is worth the lifetime of humiliation you've signed on for.

Nope, all of them have either happened as I predicted, or will.

And you are wrong on every single point of your post. Those are things YOU wish were true, happily for the rest of us, they aren't reality.

 

[PredFan]

Global Warming as we know is bull shit. As time goes by while we are arguing this issue, the planet will not appreciably warm. The Ice Caps will not disappear, the oceans will continue to not rise, and we will have snow in the places it normally does. after a ceretain number of years when it's obvious that AGW didn't happen, the believers will say this:

This really is a keeper of a comment....!

The thing that I particularly enjoy about it is that we have been arguing this topic here for some years now, and during that time we have seen unprecedented glacial melt, the collapse of Arctic ice, increased storm, rought & flood intensities, rising sea levels and coral bleaching - all things PredFan could go out and see with his own eyes tomorrow. All proven, all measurable, all happening as we speak.

And yet he is still talking about about what might happen years from now.....

Ah, no, as we've shown you many many times, there hasn't been any glacial melt, increased storms, or any of your "sky is falling" bull shit. All of that has been proven, measurable, and is actively denying your lies on a daily basis.

 

[jc456]

Why don't you show us one that failed?

If your claim is that 120 PPM of CO2 causes temperature rises, and we ask for the experiment that shows that happens, what is it you wish us to show that is failed other than your claim? And for that I posted the info in another thread from Herr Koch in 1901 it can be found in realclimate.com.

BTW, you stepping all over yourself to try and double talk something is stupid. And you wonder why you get treated as you do here.

 

[jc456]

Why don't you show us one that failed?

It's your stupid "Theory", show us one (1) that succeeded

Koch failed your theory at the turn of the 20th Century

The difference between the temperature of the Earth and the other planets with respect to their calculated, black body temperatures is de facto evidence of the reality of the greenhouse effect. CO2's demonstrated absorption of IR bands not absorbed by water vapor or any other GHG unequivocally identifies its 'greenhouse' status. Demonstrations of the effect are manifold and you have already seen and read of several. Your contention that you have not, Frank, is a clear and demonstrable lie.

So you can't produce a single lab experiment that controls for varying amounts of CO2?

Is this a simple choice of yours to tell yet another lie or do you actually believe I said anything resembling that contention? That is: are you dishonest or stupid? (Or both?)

Call me a lair all day and night, that's OK. All we know for certain is your 0 for your lifetime in posting any lab experiment that shows a temperature increase from CO2

And that's the truth

I get a clear image of Lily Tomlin' Edith Ann on R&M and SNL. Is that who you're channeling?

1) Show us documentation of a CO2 warming experiment that failed.

2) Explain the difference between the Earth's and other planet's calculated black body temperatures and their actual temperatures without making use of the greenhouse effect.

3) Explain how CO2 can absorb IR but not get warmer.

or

3) Explain why so many scientists have measured CO2 absorbing IR if it, in fact, does not.

4) Explain the warming of the 20th century without making use of the greenhouse effect?

5) Show us where I said I could not produce an experiment that "controls for varying amounts of CO2".

PS: I never called you a "lair".

no, you show the experiment that shows 120 PPM of CO2 does anything to temperatures. Yours is failed!!!!!!

 

[jc456]

and he calls me a liar too

Only when you lie, Frank, only when you lie.

Hey genuous, when did he lie?

 

[jc456]

Global Warming as we know is bull shit. As time goes by while we are arguing this issue, the planet will not appreciably warm. The Ice Caps will not disappear, the oceans will continue to not rise, and we will have snow in the places it normally does. after a ceretain number of years when it's obvious that AGW didn't happen, the believers will say this:

This really is a keeper of a comment....!

The thing that I particularly enjoy about it is that we have been arguing this topic here for some years now, and during that time we have seen unprecedented glacial melt, the collapse of Arctic ice, increased storm, rought & flood intensities, rising sea levels and coral bleaching - all things PredFan could go out and see with his own eyes tomorrow. All proven, all measurable, all happening as we speak.

And yet he is still talking about about what might happen years from now.....

isn't that what a prediction is? God are you stupid.

 

[jc456]

I gave you six questions by which, were your shit in one sock, you could have shot me down to the ground. Did you make the slightest attempt to answer ANY of them? No. I have to wonder why.

hahaahahhahahahaha....i gave you six questions, blah, blah, blah, what kind of stupid are you? What is the name of the university you got that stupid from? I gave you six questions.....hahahahhahahhahahahahahahaha what a loser. Hey champ, why not just provide the one experiment that has been requested over, and over, and over, and over and over, and then come back with your list of six questions, which BTW have been answered, but of course your stupid meter went off and it went to hell quickly. what ahoot dude.

 

[Crick]

Why don't you show us one that failed?

If your claim is that 120 PPM of CO2 causes temperature rises, and we ask for the experiment that shows that happens, what is it you wish us to show that is failed other than your claim? And for that I posted the info in another thread from Herr Koch in 1901 it can be found in realclimate.com.

BTW, you stepping all over yourself to try and double talk something is stupid. And you wonder why you get treated as you do here.

You've been shown precisely such an experiment, repeatedly. You continue to say you haven't. Thus everyone here knows you to be a liar.

Here is good history of the development of our understanding of CO2's involvement in the Greenhouse effect. Koch warrants a small mention. Download the PDF and read it. It's only a few pages.

 

[jc456]

Why don't you show us one that failed?

If your claim is that 120 PPM of CO2 causes temperature rises, and we ask for the experiment that shows that happens, what is it you wish us to show that is failed other than your claim? And for that I posted the info in another thread from Herr Koch in 1901 it can be found in realclimate.com.

BTW, you stepping all over yourself to try and double talk something is stupid. And you wonder why you get treated as you do here.

You've been shown precisely such an experiment, repeatedly. You continue to say you haven't. Thus everyone here knows you to be a liar.

Here is good history of the development of our understanding of CO2's involvement in the Greenhouse effect. Koch warrants a small mention. Download the PDF and read it. It's only a few pages.

a.....nope!

 

[Crick]

I gave you six questions by which, were your shit in one sock, you could have shot me down to the ground. Did you make the slightest attempt to answer ANY of them? No. I have to wonder why.

hahaahahhahahahaha....i gave you six questions, blah, blah, blah, what kind of stupid are you? What is the name of the university you got that stupid from? I gave you six questions.....hahahahhahahhahahahahahahaha what a loser. Hey champ, why not just provide the one experiment that has been requested over, and over, and over, and over and over, and then come back with your list of six questions, which BTW have been answered, but of course your stupid meter went off and it went to hell quickly. what ahoot dude.

How many people do you think will see this that do NOT know you've seen such experiments and thus do NOT know that you're lying? My estimate of the number would be zero.

You've had your experiment. Now answer the questions.

 

[Crick]

Here is good history of the development of our understanding of CO2's involvement in the Greenhouse effect. Koch warrants a small mention. Download the PDF and read it. It's only a few pages.

a.....nope!

Of course not.

 

[jc456]

Why don't you show us one that failed?

If your claim is that 120 PPM of CO2 causes temperature rises, and we ask for the experiment that shows that happens, what is it you wish us to show that is failed other than your claim? And for that I posted the info in another thread from Herr Koch in 1901 it can be found in realclimate.com.

BTW, you stepping all over yourself to try and double talk something is stupid. And you wonder why you get treated as you do here.

You've been shown precisely such an experiment, repeatedly. You continue to say you haven't. Thus everyone here knows you to be a liar.

Here is good history of the development of our understanding of CO2's involvement in the Greenhouse effect. Koch warrants a small mention. Download the PDF and read it. It's only a few pages.

a.....nope!

hey, hey, hey....BTW, we've now given you two that fails your claim. And PacMan gets eaten.

 

[jc456]

I gave you six questions by which, were your shit in one sock, you could have shot me down to the ground. Did you make the slightest attempt to answer ANY of them? No. I have to wonder why.

hahaahahhahahahaha....i gave you six questions, blah, blah, blah, what kind of stupid are you? What is the name of the university you got that stupid from? I gave you six questions.....hahahahhahahhahahahahahahaha what a loser. Hey champ, why not just provide the one experiment that has been requested over, and over, and over, and over and over, and then come back with your list of six questions, which BTW have been answered, but of course your stupid meter went off and it went to hell quickly. what ahoot dude.

How many people do you think will see this that do NOT know you've seen such experiments and thus do NOT know that you're lying? My estimate of the number would be zero.

You've had your experiment. Now answer the questions.

yawn, again, two experiments proving our point, your side zero. Dude you can post until your fingers bleed that you did, but alas.....you didn't!!!!! If you did, then by all means repost that puppy now so you can make your point!!! Hurry now.

 

[mamooth]

jc, you're regressing. Your sentences can't even be recognized as English any longer.

 

[SSDD]

OK. And I will remind you in a few years of how utterly stupid you were.

The present should be reminding you of how utterly stupid the predictions made20 years ago were...didn't see the pause coming did you?

 

[Crick]

You didn't either. No one did.

 

[jc456]

You didn't either. No one did.

ok............

 

[Crick]

Thus....

 

[Crick]

Criticizing mainstream science for having missed it as if they failed to do something that others did, doesn't fly.