Science and Faith

Discussion in 'Religion and Ethics' started by Freeman, Feb 14, 2011.

  1. Freeman
    Offline

    Freeman VIP Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,066
    Thanks Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +404
    This is a quote by honest swindler scientist:

    "There are only two possible explanations as to how life arose. Spontaneous generation arising to evolution or a supernatural creative act of God. . . . There is no other possibility. Spontaneous generation was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others, but that just leaves us with only one other possibility. . . that life came as a supernatural act of creation by God, but I can’t accept that philosophy because I do not want to believe in God. Therefore I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible, spontaneous generation leading to evolution."-G. Wald, Frontiers of Modern Biology on Theories of Origin of Life, New York, Houghton Mifflin-Ventura, CA: Regal Books, 1996.

    I let you comment this statement.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2011
  2. konradv
    Online

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    24,278
    Thanks Received:
    2,866
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +6,864
    Got a cite for that "proof"? I would think, if it's worth its salt, you'd provide it. It's very telling that you didn't. You're playing with words. The spontaneous generation Pasteur talked about is totally different from that believed to have started life on earth.
     
  3. G.T.
    Offline

    G.T. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    60,818
    Thanks Received:
    8,939
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    out
    Ratings:
    +40,765
    Have you ever watched "The Universe?"

    Spontaneous Generation has already been proven in a Laboratory.
     
  4. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,308
    Thanks Received:
    5,017
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,226
    No it has not. Some of the underlying processes believed to lead to life have been proven, but the process has not.
     
  5. G.T.
    Offline

    G.T. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    60,818
    Thanks Received:
    8,939
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    out
    Ratings:
    +40,765
    Yes, it has. I'll fish the net for you if you're not willing to do it on your own accord. I saw the episode.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2011
  6. Montrovant
    Offline

    Montrovant Fuzzy bears!

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    14,662
    Thanks Received:
    2,625
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Beyond the Veil
    Ratings:
    +5,850
    I wonder what led the person quoted to believe they know the only two possibilities for the beginning of life?
     
  7. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,308
    Thanks Received:
    5,017
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,226
    You do realize that History channel also has shows about UFOs, ancient astronauts, and ghost, don't you? Just because you saw something on a show does not make it true.

    I do not know what you saw on that TV episode, but your own link proves me right.

     
  8. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,308
    Thanks Received:
    5,017
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,226
    What would be a third explanation? Either it started spontaneously, or something made it happen, I can't think of a third possibility.
     
  9. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Feels Good!

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    24,196
    Thanks Received:
    5,260
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +8,158
    Ooo! looks like he pwned you with the mighty "Wikipedia" Windbag! :uhoh3:
     
  10. Robert_Stephens
    Offline

    Robert_Stephens BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    1,045
    Thanks Received:
    92
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Las Cruces, NM
    Ratings:
    +92
    The postulation for life start at the atomic and molecular level began in the animo acids in a primordial pool, pond, swamp, whereby the spark that began cell division was instituted by electrical arcing of two cells into one, thus, beginning the repetition of division. There are three theories on this topic, all with the same hypothesis.

    Thus, the beginning as we understand it requires; warmth, water, O2, organic matter, electrical energy (lightning), and the condition for all to interact, at least twice, and away it goes.......

    Robert
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2011

Share This Page