Schools Allow Only The Liberal Side...

[NYcarbineer]

Occam's Razor suggests it's a dumbass progressive who wants to shield children from dangerous ideas.

It's conservatives who fight to keep sex education out of schools.

I agree, if by sex "education" you mean sex "promotion".

What is the left's sick fascination with kids having sex?

I said sex education. There are plenty of efforts by conservatives to keep sex education out of the schools,

I guess for the purpose of shielding them from 'dangerous' ideas.

 

[NYcarbineer]

None said it outright.

But many agreed with the policy. How very tolerant of them!

So you accused me of not doing something there was no reason to do.

...comon...

Get back to the issue. Is this a students' rights issue or not?

Can you name one instance where you've chastised your fellow lefties for an action you condemned right wingers for?

I can't think of any.

Is that one thing we have in common? Because I can't think of you doing that with your fellow righties either.

Stick to the issues. Stop worrying about my posting style - and yours.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If you have to say you won...you didn't.

Why didn't you chastise her then?

You misunderstand, naturally. When YOU -- Carby -- have to say YOU -- Carby -- won...you didn't.

So if you won a game of chess, but then told someone you won, that would cost you the game?

 

[Ibentoken]

Look at the USMB Libs, nice bunch, but they have no ability to think for themselves.

You show them the lies about FDR, LBJ and McCarthy, and you get back flying froth and spittle.

Because, according to your ilk, if you believe in "magical creation", that the world is only thousands of years old, vaccines cause autism and gays learn to be gay from practice, you are "thinking for yourself".

It's none of your business. Those thoughts aren't illegal.

 

[Ibentoken]

It's conservatives who fight to keep sex education out of schools.

I agree, if by sex "education" you mean sex "promotion".

What is the left's sick fascination with kids having sex?

I said sex education. There are plenty of efforts by conservatives to keep sex education out of the schools,

I guess for the purpose of shielding them from 'dangerous' ideas.

Correct. I don't want my kid indoctrinated with new age crap.

 

[Ibentoken]

What happens when someone brings up Einstein and mentions he believed in Intelligent Design?

 

[daveman]

It's conservatives who fight to keep sex education out of schools.

I agree, if by sex "education" you mean sex "promotion".

What is the left's sick fascination with kids having sex?

I said sex education. There are plenty of efforts by conservatives to keep sex education out of the schools,

I guess for the purpose of shielding them from 'dangerous' ideas.

Much of progressive sex education is indeed sex promotion.

And the sick bastards want to start it in kindergarten.

Obama: Sex Ed for Kindergartners ?Is the Right Thing to Do? | CNS News

CPS Mandates Sexual, Health Education For Kindergarten « CBS Chicago

Just can't let kids be kids, can you? You have to sexualize them.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I agree, if by sex "education" you mean sex "promotion".

What is the left's sick fascination with kids having sex?

I said sex education. There are plenty of efforts by conservatives to keep sex education out of the schools,

I guess for the purpose of shielding them from 'dangerous' ideas.

Correct. I don't want my kid indoctrinated with new age crap.

Then argue with daveman.

 

[daveman]

So you accused me of not doing something there was no reason to do.

...comon...

Get back to the issue. Is this a students' rights issue or not?

Can you name one instance where you've chastised your fellow lefties for an action you condemned right wingers for?

I can't think of any.

Is that one thing we have in common? Because I can't think of you doing that with your fellow righties either.

Stick to the issues. Stop worrying about my posting style - and yours.

You're good at the whole selective memory thing, aren't you? You've missed -- purposefully, I expect -- many posts where I've condemned my fellow conservatives for homophobic and racist remarks.

You can't say the same, can you?

 

[daveman]

Why didn't you chastise her then?

You misunderstand, naturally. When YOU -- Carby -- have to say YOU -- Carby -- won...you didn't.

So if you won a game of chess, but then told someone you won, that would cost you the game?

Winning a game of chess is not subjective. Man, you're dumb.

 

[daveman]

I said sex education. There are plenty of efforts by conservatives to keep sex education out of the schools,

I guess for the purpose of shielding them from 'dangerous' ideas.

Correct. I don't want my kid indoctrinated with new age crap.

Then argue with daveman.

I'm not doing your job for you. Granted, you're not doing it very well, but still. Do it yourself.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I agree, if by sex "education" you mean sex "promotion".

What is the left's sick fascination with kids having sex?

I said sex education. There are plenty of efforts by conservatives to keep sex education out of the schools,

I guess for the purpose of shielding them from 'dangerous' ideas.

Much of progressive sex education is indeed sex promotion.

And the sick bastards want to start it in kindergarten.

Obama: Sex Ed for Kindergartners ?Is the Right Thing to Do? | CNS News

CPS Mandates Sexual, Health Education For Kindergarten « CBS Chicago

Just can't let kids be kids, can you? You have to sexualize them.

So your 'dangerous ideas' post was a mistake? You're backtracking now?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Correct. I don't want my kid indoctrinated with new age crap.

Then argue with daveman.

I'm not doing your job for you. Granted, you're not doing it very well, but still. Do it yourself.

He's disagreeing with you. He doesn't want his kids exposed to 'dangerous ideas'. You were mocking those people earlier.

 

[daveman]

I said sex education. There are plenty of efforts by conservatives to keep sex education out of the schools,

I guess for the purpose of shielding them from 'dangerous' ideas.

Much of progressive sex education is indeed sex promotion.

And the sick bastards want to start it in kindergarten.

Obama: Sex Ed for Kindergartners ?Is the Right Thing to Do? | CNS News

CPS Mandates Sexual, Health Education For Kindergarten « CBS Chicago

Just can't let kids be kids, can you? You have to sexualize them.

So your 'dangerous ideas' post was a mistake? You're backtracking now?

No, dumbass. Sex education is good (when it's genuine education and not promotion). Sex education for 5-year-olds is inappropriate.

You do know the difference between 5-year-olds and 12-year-olds, right?

 

[NYcarbineer]

What happens when someone brings up Einstein and mentions he believed in Intelligent Design?

The same thing that happens when someone brings Lamarck's theory that giraffes evolved long necks from stretching them to reach higher branches and the result of the stretching was transmitted to the offspring.

 

[daveman]

Then argue with daveman.

I'm not doing your job for you. Granted, you're not doing it very well, but still. Do it yourself.

He's disagreeing with you. He doesn't want his kids exposed to 'dangerous ideas'. You were mocking those people earlier.

He's free to homeschool, or send his kids to private or church school.

Progressives hate those, too.

 

[Ibentoken]

What happens when someone brings up Einstein and mentions he believed in Intelligent Design?

The same thing that happens when someone brings Lamarck's theory that giraffes evolved long necks from stretching them to reach higher branches and the result of the stretching was transmitted to the offspring.

Whatever. Are you okay with discussibg Intelligent Design in the public schools?

 

[NYcarbineer]

What happens when someone brings up Einstein and mentions he believed in Intelligent Design?

The same thing that happens when someone brings Lamarck's theory that giraffes evolved long necks from stretching them to reach higher branches and the result of the stretching was transmitted to the offspring.

Whatever. Are you okay with discussibg Intelligent Design in the public schools?

It should be discussed as one of the many non-scientific theories regarding evolution and the origins of life.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I'm not doing your job for you. Granted, you're not doing it very well, but still. Do it yourself.

He's disagreeing with you. He doesn't want his kids exposed to 'dangerous ideas'. You were mocking those people earlier.

He's free to homeschool, or send his kids to private or church school.

Progressives hate those, too.

So are the people who object to a school's internet filter that doesn't allow the kids to go to websites about firearms.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Much of progressive sex education is indeed sex promotion.

And the sick bastards want to start it in kindergarten.

Obama: Sex Ed for Kindergartners ?Is the Right Thing to Do? | CNS News

CPS Mandates Sexual, Health Education For Kindergarten « CBS Chicago

Just can't let kids be kids, can you? You have to sexualize them.

So your 'dangerous ideas' post was a mistake? You're backtracking now?

No, dumbass. Sex education is good (when it's genuine education and not promotion). Sex education for 5-year-olds is inappropriate.

You do know the difference between 5-year-olds and 12-year-olds, right?

Why the big ongoing conservative push for abstinence-only sex education?