Saudi clerics call for jihad against Russia in Syria – to back ISIS?

[Sally]

These clerics are always inciting others to do the dirty work, but never would think of going themselves.

Saudi clerics call for jihad against Russia in Syria – to back ISIS?
Published time: 7 Oct, 2015 02:06Edited time: 7 Oct, 2015 16:58
Get short URL

Militant Islamist fighters wave flags as they take part in a military parade along the streets of Syria's northern Raqqa province. © Stringer / Reuters
10.3K6791
Dozens of Saudi Arabian clerics not officially affiliated with Riyadh have urged Muslims to support the fight of “holy warriors” against Syria’s government and its Iranian and Russian allies. The clerics are outraged by Russia’s bombing of Islamic State.
TrendsRussian anti-terror op in Syria
READ MORE: Russian jets hit 12 ISIS targets in Syria, cause panic among extremists – Defense Ministry

Fifty-five Saudi Arabian ‘opposition’ clerics and academicians, including some prominent Islamists, have signed a joint online statement urging “true Muslims” to “give all moral, material, political and military” support to the fight against Syrian President Bashar Assad’s army as well as Iranian and Russian forces.

The statement follows the commencement of daily Russian air raids in Syria targeting Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) terrorists. Contrary to Riyadh’s public anti-ISIS stance, the clerics’ call appears to be portraying the militants as “defenders” of faith.

“The holy warriors of Syria are defending the whole Islamic nation. Trust them and support them ... because if they are defeated, God forbid, it will be the turn of one Sunni country after another,” the call reads, as cited by Reuters.

Continue reading at:

Saudi clerics call for jihad against Russia in Syria – to back ISIS??

 

[Penelope]

Does anyone have an doubt who Isis is really employed by, Saudi Arabia and Israel and the FSA, the US.

Saudi Arabia is the largest backer of terrorism, not Iran.

 

[montelatici]

Our local ISIS supporters must be cheering the Saudis on. Everyone knows the Saudis and the other Sunni states support and finance ISIS. The Saudis are facilitating an ISIS and Al Qaeda takeover in Yemen with their constant bombing. The Saudis consider ISIS "Holy Warriors" and the Russians Christian Crusaders. Why the West, and many of the demented posters here, support these Islamist creeps is a wonder to me.

 

[Roudy]

It's an Islamist supremacist game of thrones. The Shiite axis is no better than the Sunni ISIS. These two have been at each other's throats for the last 1400 years. The Iran / Iraq war was all about this, costing both sides a million lives.

Islam, where brain cells go to die.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Have fun with that mess Putin

 

[Camp]

It's an Islamist supremacist game of thrones. The Shiite axis is no better than the Sunni ISIS. These two have been at each other's throats for the last 1400 years. The Iran / Iraq war was all about this, costing both sides a million lives.

Islam, where brain cells go to die.

Russia picked the Shiite side and is warring with and killing Sunni's, most of which are not ISIS. That is the bottom line. All the other pieces of the puzzle become irrelevant when the basics are considered. Sunni vs Shiite with some occasional intermingling of the two as tribes and temporary allies are made for mutual benefits.

 

[Penelope]

It's an Islamist supremacist game of thrones. The Shiite axis is no better than the Sunni ISIS. These two have been at each other's throats for the last 1400 years. The Iran / Iraq war was all about this, costing both sides a million lives.

Islam, where brain cells go to die.

No they are better than Sunni Wahhabis, and they see right through Israel. Saudi Arabia and Israel , same pea pod.

 

[Roudy]

It's an Islamist supremacist game of thrones. The Shiite axis is no better than the Sunni ISIS. These two have been at each other's throats for the last 1400 years. The Iran / Iraq war was all about this, costing both sides a million lives.

Islam, where brain cells go to die.

Russia picked the Shiite side and is warring with and killing Sunni's, most of which are not ISIS. That is the bottom line. All the other pieces of the puzzle become irrelevant when the basics are considered. Sunni vs Shiite with some occasional intermingling of the two as tribes and temporary allies are made for mutual benefits.

Had Obama acted earlier, there would not be 300,000 dead Syrians now, and millions of refugees, some of them ISIS plants flooding Europe. Nor would we have Russia humiliating America once again.

At this point however there isnt much the U.S. or anybody can do but to let the two keep killing each other, and let Russia sink into another costly quagmire like they did in Afghanistan.

 

[Roudy]

It's an Islamist supremacist game of thrones. The Shiite axis is no better than the Sunni ISIS. These two have been at each other's throats for the last 1400 years. The Iran / Iraq war was all about this, costing both sides a million lives.

Islam, where brain cells go to die.

No they are better than Sunni Wahhabis, and they see right through Israel. Saudi Arabia and Israel , same pea pod.

Shiites are just as barbaric if not more than the Sunnis. Here is a Shiite holiday, Islam, where brain cells go to die:

 

[Penelope]

It's an Islamist supremacist game of thrones. The Shiite axis is no better than the Sunni ISIS. These two have been at each other's throats for the last 1400 years. The Iran / Iraq war was all about this, costing both sides a million lives.

Islam, where brain cells go to die.

No they are better than Sunni Wahhabis, and they see right through Israel. Saudi Arabia and Israel , same pea pod.

Shiites are just as barbaric if not more than the Sunnis. Here is a Shiite holiday, Islam, where brain cells go to die:

You pictures mean nothing , probably a film and actors.

 

[Roudy]

It's an Islamist supremacist game of thrones. The Shiite axis is no better than the Sunni ISIS. These two have been at each other's throats for the last 1400 years. The Iran / Iraq war was all about this, costing both sides a million lives.

Islam, where brain cells go to die.

No they are better than Sunni Wahhabis, and they see right through Israel. Saudi Arabia and Israel , same pea pod.

Shiites are just as barbaric if not more than the Sunnis. Here is a Shiite holiday, Islam, where brain cells go to die:

You pictures mean nothing , probably a film and actors.

They are mourning their prophet's death. Look it up, you ignorant moron.

Day of Ashura - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Camp]

It's an Islamist supremacist game of thrones. The Shiite axis is no better than the Sunni ISIS. These two have been at each other's throats for the last 1400 years. The Iran / Iraq war was all about this, costing both sides a million lives.

Islam, where brain cells go to die.

Russia picked the Shiite side and is warring with and killing Sunni's, most of which are not ISIS. That is the bottom line. All the other pieces of the puzzle become irrelevant when the basics are considered. Sunni vs Shiite with some occasional intermingling of the two as tribes and temporary allies are made for mutual benefits.

Had Obama acted earlier, there would not be 300,000 dead Syrians now, and millions of refugees, some of them ISIS plants flooding Europe. Nor would we have Russia humiliating America once again.

At this point however there isnt much the U.S. or anybody can do but to let the two keep killing each other, and let Russia sink into another costly quagmire like they did in Afghanistan.

I am glad we did not confront ISIS with American troops when they showed up. I am glad we got out of Iraq and didn't leave a force behind that would have been trapped into a combat role to protect the Iraqi's who refused to fight for themselves. Those dead Syrians were not our responsibility and not one American should have been sacrificed in that civil war. The only options I support are the ones that don't include boxes of dead US soldiers coming home and refilling our VA hospitals with even more maimed and crippled Americans.

 

[Roudy]

It's an Islamist supremacist game of thrones. The Shiite axis is no better than the Sunni ISIS. These two have been at each other's throats for the last 1400 years. The Iran / Iraq war was all about this, costing both sides a million lives.

Islam, where brain cells go to die.

Russia picked the Shiite side and is warring with and killing Sunni's, most of which are not ISIS. That is the bottom line. All the other pieces of the puzzle become irrelevant when the basics are considered. Sunni vs Shiite with some occasional intermingling of the two as tribes and temporary allies are made for mutual benefits.

Had Obama acted earlier, there would not be 300,000 dead Syrians now, and millions of refugees, some of them ISIS plants flooding Europe. Nor would we have Russia humiliating America once again.

At this point however there isnt much the U.S. or anybody can do but to let the two keep killing each other, and let Russia sink into another costly quagmire like they did in Afghanistan.

I am glad we did not confront ISIS with American troops when they showed up. I am glad we got out of Iraq and didn't leave a force behind that would have been trapped into a combat role to protect the Iraqi's who refused to fight for themselves. Those dead Syrians were not our responsibility and not one American should have been sacrificed in that civil war. The only options I support are the ones that don't include boxes of dead US soldiers coming home and refilling our VA hospitals with even more maimed and crippled Americans.

the cancer has now spread and it's too late now. Obama could have assisted the secular resistance forces and conducted some bombing of Assad's forces to prevent Assad from slaughtering his own people, and ISIS stepping into the vacuum.

 

[Camp]

It's an Islamist supremacist game of thrones. The Shiite axis is no better than the Sunni ISIS. These two have been at each other's throats for the last 1400 years. The Iran / Iraq war was all about this, costing both sides a million lives.

Islam, where brain cells go to die.

Russia picked the Shiite side and is warring with and killing Sunni's, most of which are not ISIS. That is the bottom line. All the other pieces of the puzzle become irrelevant when the basics are considered. Sunni vs Shiite with some occasional intermingling of the two as tribes and temporary allies are made for mutual benefits.

Had Obama acted earlier, there would not be 300,000 dead Syrians now, and millions of refugees, some of them ISIS plants flooding Europe. Nor would we have Russia humiliating America once again.

At this point however there isnt much the U.S. or anybody can do but to let the two keep killing each other, and let Russia sink into another costly quagmire like they did in Afghanistan.

I am glad we did not confront ISIS with American troops when they showed up. I am glad we got out of Iraq and didn't leave a force behind that would have been trapped into a combat role to protect the Iraqi's who refused to fight for themselves. Those dead Syrians were not our responsibility and not one American should have been sacrificed in that civil war. The only options I support are the ones that don't include boxes of dead US soldiers coming home and refilling our VA hospitals with even more maimed and crippled Americans.

the cancer has now spread and it's too late now. Obama could have assisted the secular resistance forces and conducted some bombing of Assad's forces to prevent Assad from slaughtering his own people, and ISIS stepping into the vacuum.

Obama wanted to bomb Assad after he used chemical weapons. That is what the Red Line was about. Congress decided they did not want Assad's forces bombed. The administration came under pressure to not support the rebels. Accusations are made to this day that Ben Ghazi was related to weapons being supplied to rebel forces. Your suggestion now is that the US should have gone it alone without support from the surrounding countries and waged a new war in Syria without congressional, UN or international legal cause to do so.

 

[Penelope]

It's an Islamist supremacist game of thrones. The Shiite axis is no better than the Sunni ISIS. These two have been at each other's throats for the last 1400 years. The Iran / Iraq war was all about this, costing both sides a million lives.

Islam, where brain cells go to die.

No they are better than Sunni Wahhabis, and they see right through Israel. Saudi Arabia and Israel , same pea pod.

Shiites are just as barbaric if not more than the Sunnis. Here is a Shiite holiday, Islam, where brain cells go to die:

You pictures mean nothing , probably a film and actors.

They are mourning their prophet's death. Look it up, you ignorant moron.

Day of Ashura - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

when you post, leave a link. So its a celebration, not much difference than those who get nailed to the cross, literally, in the Philippines is, it. I see you went back and put up a description that was not there when you posted the pics, keep your Zionist insults to yourself.

 

[longknife]

Back to the idiotic Sunni vs Shia BS!

 

[Roudy]

It's an Islamist supremacist game of thrones. The Shiite axis is no better than the Sunni ISIS. These two have been at each other's throats for the last 1400 years. The Iran / Iraq war was all about this, costing both sides a million lives.

Islam, where brain cells go to die.

Russia picked the Shiite side and is warring with and killing Sunni's, most of which are not ISIS. That is the bottom line. All the other pieces of the puzzle become irrelevant when the basics are considered. Sunni vs Shiite with some occasional intermingling of the two as tribes and temporary allies are made for mutual benefits.

Had Obama acted earlier, there would not be 300,000 dead Syrians now, and millions of refugees, some of them ISIS plants flooding Europe. Nor would we have Russia humiliating America once again.

At this point however there isnt much the U.S. or anybody can do but to let the two keep killing each other, and let Russia sink into another costly quagmire like they did in Afghanistan.

I am glad we did not confront ISIS with American troops when they showed up. I am glad we got out of Iraq and didn't leave a force behind that would have been trapped into a combat role to protect the Iraqi's who refused to fight for themselves. Those dead Syrians were not our responsibility and not one American should have been sacrificed in that civil war. The only options I support are the ones that don't include boxes of dead US soldiers coming home and refilling our VA hospitals with even more maimed and crippled Americans.

the cancer has now spread and it's too late now. Obama could have assisted the secular resistance forces and conducted some bombing of Assad's forces to prevent Assad from slaughtering his own people, and ISIS stepping into the vacuum.

Obama wanted to bomb Assad after he used chemical weapons. That is what the Red Line was about. Congress decided they did not want Assad's forces bombed. The administration came under pressure to not support the rebels. Accusations are made to this day that Ben Ghazi was related to weapons being supplied to rebel forces. Your suggestion now is that the US should have gone it alone without support from the surrounding countries and waged a new war in Syria without congressional, UN or international legal cause to do so.

The US should have bombed Assad's forces after the chemical weapons were dropped. The US had the approval of the Arab world and the international community. But like everything else with this president, he's an empty suit there to shove his radical ideological agenda down the throats of an unwilling American people. Congress voted against it because of the way the president had formulated the bill. The bigger thing about Ben Ghazi in my opinion was the way the president and Hillary lied to the face of the American people. He should have been impeached for that, but unfortunately the Democrats will even stand by a traitor and put party allegiance above national security.

 

[Roudy]

Back to the idiotic Sunni vs Shia BS!

Leave some popcorn for me!

 

[Roudy]

It's an Islamist supremacist game of thrones. The Shiite axis is no better than the Sunni ISIS. These two have been at each other's throats for the last 1400 years. The Iran / Iraq war was all about this, costing both sides a million lives.

Islam, where brain cells go to die.

No they are better than Sunni Wahhabis, and they see right through Israel. Saudi Arabia and Israel , same pea pod.

Shiites are just as barbaric if not more than the Sunnis. Here is a Shiite holiday, Islam, where brain cells go to die:

You pictures mean nothing , probably a film and actors.

They are mourning their prophet's death. Look it up, you ignorant moron.

Day of Ashura - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

when you post, leave a link. So its a celebration, not much difference than those who get nailed to the cross, literally, in the Philippines is, it. I see you went back and put up a description that was not there when you posted the pics, keep your Zionist insults to yourself.

You are ignorant beyond belief. Does it matter whether you call it celebration or a holiday, this is what Shiites do, ask anybody who has lived with them. They are probably even more barbaric and bloodthirsty than the Sunnis, but since the Sunnis outnumber them, you see the Sunni savagery more often.

 

[montelatici]

Russia picked the Shiite side and is warring with and killing Sunni's, most of which are not ISIS. That is the bottom line. All the other pieces of the puzzle become irrelevant when the basics are considered. Sunni vs Shiite with some occasional intermingling of the two as tribes and temporary allies are made for mutual benefits.

Had Obama acted earlier, there would not be 300,000 dead Syrians now, and millions of refugees, some of them ISIS plants flooding Europe. Nor would we have Russia humiliating America once again.

At this point however there isnt much the U.S. or anybody can do but to let the two keep killing each other, and let Russia sink into another costly quagmire like they did in Afghanistan.

I am glad we did not confront ISIS with American troops when they showed up. I am glad we got out of Iraq and didn't leave a force behind that would have been trapped into a combat role to protect the Iraqi's who refused to fight for themselves. Those dead Syrians were not our responsibility and not one American should have been sacrificed in that civil war. The only options I support are the ones that don't include boxes of dead US soldiers coming home and refilling our VA hospitals with even more maimed and crippled Americans.

the cancer has now spread and it's too late now. Obama could have assisted the secular resistance forces and conducted some bombing of Assad's forces to prevent Assad from slaughtering his own people, and ISIS stepping into the vacuum.

Obama wanted to bomb Assad after he used chemical weapons. That is what the Red Line was about. Congress decided they did not want Assad's forces bombed. The administration came under pressure to not support the rebels. Accusations are made to this day that Ben Ghazi was related to weapons being supplied to rebel forces. Your suggestion now is that the US should have gone it alone without support from the surrounding countries and waged a new war in Syria without congressional, UN or international legal cause to do so.

The US should have bombed Assad's forces after the chemical weapons were dropped. The US had the approval of the Arab world and the international community. But like everything else with this president, he's an empty suit there to shove his radical ideological agenda down the throats of an unwilling American people. Congress voted against it because of the way the president had formulated the bill. The bigger thing about Ben Ghazi in my opinion was the way the president and Hillary lied to the face of the American people. He should have been impeached for that, but unfortunately the Democrats will even stand by a traitor and put party allegiance above national security.

The U.S. should have bombed Israel when they dropped white phosphorous on the Palestinians in Gaza.