Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This ought to strike a nerve and she's right. Obama never had the intense scrutiny over his past as they are doing O'Donnells past. I think Palin has some b*lls and guts to bring this up during this campaign. She ought to know because as soon as she was announced VP, the Obama sent squadrons of people to incover her past. Palins has a legit point about Obama and why isn't O'Donnell getting a pass like Obama
Palin: Why No Probe of Barack 'Hussein' Obama?
During an interview with Fox News host Greta Van Susteren Wednesday night, Palin said: "Funny . . . That we are learning more about Christine O'Donnell and her college years, her teenage years, her financial dealings than anybody ever even bothered to ask about Barack Hussein Obama as a candidate and now as our president."
Obama has yet to release college transcripts and files from his undergraduate work at Occidental College and Columbia University, and later at Harvard Law School. His college dissertation at Columbia has disappeared. Many of his official papers during his time as an Illinois state representative have also disappeared. He has never released his full medical records.
Palin attacks Obama in video above:
Either Sarah is stoopid or they don't get Hannity's radio show up in Alaska. I quit listening to him because his show turned into a three hour a day, five day a week tirade about Obama's guilt by association for most of the election year. Sheesh, the #2 radio program in America was a one trick pony for a year. He still brings it up every chance he gets and he is only one of scores of radio talkers who harp(ed) on Obama.
Seriously? You think a talk radio host going on about a Presidential candidate, however often he did so, is comparable to every media outlet in the country blasting every detail of the entire existence of a Senate candidate from Delaware day in, day out? Really? You're really going to tell me that 1) Obama got the same scrutiny from the media that this woman is getting, and 2) that he shouldn't actually have gotten MORE?
The boys at Fox . They aren't a news organization. They're political advocacy. They, like vampires and other parasites need blood (juicy irrelevant tidbits, intellectual appetizers for the intellectually famished) to survive.Isn't there a whole network dedicated to scrutinizing Obama?
Isn't there a whole network dedicated to scrutinizing Obama?
Either Sarah is stoopid or they don't get Hannity's radio show up in Alaska. I quit listening to him because his show turned into a three hour a day, five day a week tirade about Obama's guilt by association for most of the election year. Sheesh, the #2 radio program in America was a one trick pony for a year. He still brings it up every chance he gets and he is only one of scores of radio talkers who harp(ed) on Obama.
Seriously? You think a talk radio host going on about a Presidential candidate, however often he did so, is comparable to every media outlet in the country blasting every detail of the entire existence of a Senate candidate from Delaware day in, day out? Really? You're really going to tell me that 1) Obama got the same scrutiny from the media that this woman is getting, and 2) that he shouldn't actually have gotten MORE?
No, I'm not going to tell you that. What I am saying is that saying there was NO scrutiny is false.
There's always a scapegoat, always and excuse when you're out of power. But, come to think of it, where Conservatives are concerned, even when they're in power, there's always a scapegoat, always an excuse.Isn't there a whole network dedicated to scrutinizing Obama?
Maybe so but the rest of the MSM is dedicated to getting Democrats elected. All recent non-partisan studies have shown that the Mainstream News Media is dominated by registered Democrats. So it's clear what their agenda is. They got this current President elected and they're still spinning for him. Democratic Candidates do not get scrutinized nearly as intensely as Republican Candidates do by the MSM. Like i said,it is what it is.
Seriously? You think a talk radio host going on about a Presidential candidate, however often he did so, is comparable to every media outlet in the country blasting every detail of the entire existence of a Senate candidate from Delaware day in, day out? Really? You're really going to tell me that 1) Obama got the same scrutiny from the media that this woman is getting, and 2) that he shouldn't actually have gotten MORE?
No, I'm not going to tell you that. What I am saying is that saying there was NO scrutiny is false.
I don't believe anyone is saying there was no scrutiny at all. I believe the point is that there was no scrutiny by the mainstream media, and that in fact, the Internet and talk radio had to pick up the slack and do the MSM's job for them on Obama, while meanwhile, the MSM are crawling up this Senate candidate's butt with microscopes.
And I think you know all that perfectly well, and are being deliberately obtuse to avoid having to admit there's a glaring double standard.
No, I'm not going to tell you that. What I am saying is that saying there was NO scrutiny is false.
I don't believe anyone is saying there was no scrutiny at all. I believe the point is that there was no scrutiny by the mainstream media, and that in fact, the Internet and talk radio had to pick up the slack and do the MSM's job for them on Obama, while meanwhile, the MSM are crawling up this Senate candidate's butt with microscopes.
And I think you know all that perfectly well, and are being deliberately obtuse to avoid having to admit there's a glaring double standard.
One word is appropriate to respond to your partisanship: nonsense.
Isn't there a whole network dedicated to scrutinizing Obama?
All recent non-partisan studies have shown that the Mainstream News Media is dominated by registered Democrats. So it's clear what their agenda is. They got this current President elected and they're still spinning for him. Democratic Candidates do not get scrutinized nearly as intensely as Republican Candidates do by the MSM. Like i said,it is what it is.
You are an idiot! Palin is correct, everythinmg about obamas past was hush hush, yet he sent his thugs to Alaska to try and dig up dirt on Gov. Palin. I still do not beleive obama was born in Hawaii. Why is his birth certificate such a secret, his own grandmother said he was born in Kenya. So who cares what o'donnell did when she was in high school.I think Obama has been the most scrutinized politician in the last hundred years.
Someone who wasn't scrutinized was Sarah Palin. Who knew her husband belonged to a secessionist organization that called for the destruction of the US? Remember when she was getting protection from witchcraft by a domestic terrorist on Youtube?
Different. Jesus is not dead, and he is the only one you should pray to.Remember when Hillary was having seances in the White House channeling Eleanor Roosevelt?I think Obama has been the most scrutinized politician in the last hundred years.
Someone who wasn't scrutinized was Sarah Palin. Who knew her husband belonged to a secessionist organization that called for the destruction of the US? Remember when she was getting protection from witchcraft by a domestic terrorist on Youtube?
While serving as First Lady in the White House, Hillary Clinton claims to have had conversations with the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt about the problems and responsibilities of being First Lady.
According to Hillary at the time, it was a two-way conversation.
When Hillary “Channeled” Eleanor Roosevelt | Sweetness & Light
People pray to the dead Jesus every day.
Isn't there a whole network dedicated to scrutinizing Obama?
All recent non-partisan studies have shown that the Mainstream News Media is dominated by registered Democrats. So it's clear what their agenda is. They got this current President elected and they're still spinning for him. Democratic Candidates do not get scrutinized nearly as intensely as Republican Candidates do by the MSM. Like i said,it is what it is.
Links to statistics?
Different. Jesus is not dead, and he is the only one you should pray to.Remember when Hillary was having seances in the White House channeling Eleanor Roosevelt?
While serving as First Lady in the White House, Hillary Clinton claims to have had conversations with the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt about the problems and responsibilities of being First Lady.
According to Hillary at the time, it was a two-way conversation.
When Hillary Channeled Eleanor Roosevelt | Sweetness & Light
People pray to the dead Jesus every day.
All recent non-partisan studies have shown that the Mainstream News Media is dominated by registered Democrats. So it's clear what their agenda is. They got this current President elected and they're still spinning for him. Democratic Candidates do not get scrutinized nearly as intensely as Republican Candidates do by the MSM. Like i said,it is what it is.
Links to statistics?
Seriously? You seriously want to challenge this and demand proof?
Media Bias Basics
Increasingly, Reporters Say They're Democrats - NYTimes.com
The American Journalist: Politics and Party Affiliation
Blue Sky - Why is the Sky Blue?
I added that last one just in case you needed any OTHER basics of life explained to you.
All recent non-partisan studies have shown that the Mainstream News Media is dominated by registered Democrats. So it's clear what their agenda is. They got this current President elected and they're still spinning for him. Democratic Candidates do not get scrutinized nearly as intensely as Republican Candidates do by the MSM. Like i said,it is what it is.
Links to statistics?
Seriously? You seriously want to challenge this and demand proof?
Media Bias Basics
Blue Sky - Why is the Sky Blue?
I added that last one just in case you needed any OTHER basics of life explained to you.
Links to statistics?
Seriously? You seriously want to challenge this and demand proof?
Media Bias Basics
Increasingly, Reporters Say They're Democrats - NYTimes.com
The American Journalist: Politics and Party Affiliation
Blue Sky - Why is the Sky Blue?
I added that last one just in case you needed any OTHER basics of life explained to you.
"Bias" Isn't SupportedBecause It's Not True
Move Along ... No Bias To See Here | ConWebWatch
CNN.com - Bill Press: The myth of the liberal media rides again - February 23, 2002
BartCop's most recent rants - Political Humor and Commentary
Links to statistics?
Seriously? You seriously want to challenge this and demand proof?
Media Bias Basics
LOL. Coming brom a biased organization.
Media Research Center - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Media Research Center (MRC) is a conservative content analysis organization based in Alexandria, Virginia, founded in 1987 by conservative activist L. Brent Bozell III. Its mission, according to its website, is "to bring balance to the news media", and the MRC catalogs and reports on media bias in the United States press. The organization makes the stated assumption in its mission statement that "liberal bias in the media does exist and undermines traditional American values", so part of its purpose is to actively "neutralize its impact [of liberal bias] on the American political scene." MRC is widely called "conservative".
So most reporters are Democrats.
So most reporters are Democrats.
Blue Sky - Why is the Sky Blue?
I added that last one just in case you needed any OTHER basics of life explained to you.
Silly.
LOL. Coming brom a biased organization.
Media Research Center - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Media Research Center (MRC) is a conservative content analysis organization based in Alexandria, Virginia, founded in 1987 by conservative activist L. Brent Bozell III. Its mission, according to its website, is "to bring balance to the news media", and the MRC catalogs and reports on media bias in the United States press. The organization makes the stated assumption in its mission statement that "liberal bias in the media does exist and undermines traditional American values", so part of its purpose is to actively "neutralize its impact [of liberal bias] on the American political scene." MRC is widely called "conservative".
So most reporters are Democrats.
So most reporters are Democrats.
Blue Sky - Why is the Sky Blue?
I added that last one just in case you needed any OTHER basics of life explained to you.
Silly.
Well, if the great, omniscient, infallible WIKIPEDIA says it, that settles it. Seriously, if you leftist dipwads ever encountered a REAL information source, your empty skulls would implode. God help you if Wikipedia's server ever goes down.
And I just love the whole "prove that reporters are biased" and THEN saying "So they're Democrats", as though the proof you asked for is immaterial to your request for it.
Strike two, imbecile.
Have y'all recognized the USA Retired theme? Down on a president of color, down on the Jew (the Holocaust did not happen), down on Muslims, down on Hispanics. America is for whites, period, for him.
we all recognize you're a troll jake...you never support a single thing you propose, state or claim...
and ZOMG...he has something to say against obama and its....agaisnt a president of color....how odd....when people speak against bush, you don't say they are against bush's skin color...
hacks and trolls like you always fall back on obama's skin color as a defense...its sad....and racist
