Sanders Is Drawing Crowds BIG Crowds

Thanks for posting a source on Trump, I'll read it if it's on line.

Why would Sen. Sanders opinion on SSM and Abortion impact your vote - both are now settled law?

Citizen United is now settled law and yet you scream like a child against it and rail on people who criticize roe v wade and ssm. You're a fine example of a hypocrite.

Um, CU's repeal moved our nation much closer to a plutocracy, and oligarchy of the rich and power elite (apples);

Roe and SSM were about rights, restoring rights to citizens, thus a nation of the people, by the people & for the people (oranges).

Rights were taken away from the unborn.
Thanks for posting a source on Trump, I'll read it if it's on line.

Why would Sen. Sanders opinion on SSM and Abortion impact your vote - both are now settled law?

Citizen United is now settled law and yet you scream like a child against it and rail on people who criticize roe v wade and ssm. You're a fine example of a hypocrite.

Um, CU's repeal moved our nation much closer to a plutocracy, and oligarchy of the rich and power elite (apples);

Roe and SSM were about rights, restoring rights to citizens, thus a nation of the people, by the people & for the people (oranges).

Rights were taken away from the unborn.
Thanks for posting a source on Trump, I'll read it if it's on line.

Why would Sen. Sanders opinion on SSM and Abortion impact your vote - both are now settled law?

Citizen United is now settled law and yet you scream like a child against it and rail on people who criticize roe v wade and ssm. You're a fine example of a hypocrite.

Um, CU's repeal moved our nation much closer to a plutocracy, and oligarchy of the rich and power elite (apples);

Roe and SSM were about rights, restoring rights to citizens, thus a nation of the people, by the people & for the people (oranges).

Rights were taken away from the unborn.

So you support age appropraite sex education in the public schools, including the use of contraceptives which reduce the likelihood of an unwanted pregnancy and the transmission of STD's.

That's good, now how about the CHIPS Program, where Democrats support health insurance from birth to age 18 for certain families to be extended to all parents of children from birth to age 18. Do you support that too?

What about providing a free public education beginning well before K. and extending to at least grades 13 & 14 (prep. for a University degree or a polytechnical curriculum directed to job in the 21st Century)? Do you support this too?

That's what pragmatic people support, those who can't think support the current iteration of the Republican Party, or default to Libertarian fantasy.

So what banner do you fly, the one with a lighted light bulb, or the one with an ostrich?

BTW, abortion has been around as long as prostitution - get over it and work to make unwanted pregnancy a rare occurrence.


Once again, you default to govt induced loving care.....which, in itself, is a fantasy but one that you engage in quite frequently. I have no problem with sex education in schools at age appropriate levels. You can't be arguing that our current free education works. We rank from the middle to the bottom in several categories. That you would be pleased with this degree of mediocrity doesn't surprise me though. Nothing of what you have stated is pragmatic. It's bizarre to actual fact but I guess quite soothing to someone who enjoys digging deep into the cool sand. You should come up for air every now and then to reality.

For profit, is FOR profit and to suggest as you have private schools are better at "loving care" isn't proven. Public schools need to accept every child, not so for the private schools who can and are picky.

There is no doubt the public school system is in need of reform; we should not continue to do the same thing and expect different results. Once again the issue is money, and the need to develop a system fair and effective for the least and most capable, as well as those in the middle, the late bloomers and those who lack parental support.

As for your continued personal attacks I can only offer this in all honesty. I find your comments at best prosaic, and little more than an echo of commonly supposed memes.
 
I'm never upset by the arrogant ignorance coming from the contemporary right wing of the Republican Party, but thanks for your concern Armchaos.

The RED SCARE is nothing new, and is no more a threat to our nation today than it was in the 1950's.

In fact the greater threat our nation faces politically comes from the far right, while you were looking under your bed for a communist, the plutocrats and neo fascists obliterated what was once the model for self government, the democratic republic Mr. Franklin said we had if we could keep it.



"The RED SCARE is nothing new, and is no more a threat to our nation today than it was in the 1950's."


Talk about your head in the sand.


But....if you're as ugly as your post is stupid, you're probably doing all of us a favor.
 
Only dumb asses who don't pay attention think Sanders is comparable to Trump.
Beat it clown trash. Go get your work checked or diaper changed.
Only dumb asses who don't pay attention think Sanders is comparable to Trump.

And where did someone say that?

Someone said that a Trump/Sanders campaign is "what we deserve". That person insinuated that they are both outrageous candidates. Who was that?

Sanders is a serious candidate who is dogged in his determination to stick to the issues. Trump is a joke.

Dumb shit.
While I think sanders is a dangerous racist loon, he is better than Trump
 
A lot of what Bernie says makes sense, and I'll guarantee you the amount of people who agree with him is growing.

The GOP had better learn what "democratic socialism" is pretty soon, or it's in for a big surprise.

.

Ive been following him for 20+ years. He is the only candidate that will do for THIS country.
 
Only dumb asses who don't pay attention think Sanders is comparable to Trump.
Beat it clown trash. Go get your work checked or diaper changed.
Only dumb asses who don't pay attention think Sanders is comparable to Trump.

And where did someone say that?

Someone said that a Trump/Sanders campaign is "what we deserve". That person insinuated that they are both outrageous candidates. Who was that?

Sanders is a serious candidate who is dogged in his determination to stick to the issues. Trump is a joke.

Dumb shit.
While I think sanders is a dangerous racist loon, he is better than Trump

Dangerous? Racist? Loon?

Three charges......no evidence. Well done.
 
Watch out on this guys position. He is essentially bringing back the Yellow Peril of a century ago. He makes racist appeals on his trade discussions constantly. his 90% tax rate is stupid.

He is honest. Ill give him that.
 
I'm never upset by the arrogant ignorance coming from the contemporary right wing of the Republican Party, but thanks for your concern Armchaos.

The RED SCARE is nothing new, and is no more a threat to our nation today than it was in the 1950's.

In fact the greater threat our nation faces politically comes from the far right, while you were looking under your bed for a communist, the plutocrats and neo fascists obliterated what was once the model for self government, the democratic republic Mr. Franklin said we had if we could keep it.



"The RED SCARE is nothing new, and is no more a threat to our nation today than it was in the 1950's."


Talk about your head in the sand.


But....if you're as ugly as your post is stupid, you're probably doing all of us a favor.

Do yourself and everyone else a favor and get into group psychotherapy, pills and a dose of reality might make you into a tolerable human being.
 
The truth is that inequality will be a major issue in 2016. That's because it's reality. People can deny it but a majority of economist believe it. Top economist are telling us that inequality is hurting economic stability and this situation will get worse.
People repeat that doing something about inequality will be robbing the rich to give to the poor. Yet this inequality's history shows the demise of the middle class wealth as it transferred upwards. It showed the rewards of record productivity ( profits) bypassing the worker and going to the CEOs, the Boards and the stockholder, while the worker flounders with flat wage growth.
Ignorant people think inequality isn't important and it'll go away. Those fools are in for a very rude awakening, income/wealth inequality could very well determine the 2016 elections in a very profound way.
Saunders large crowds, even in Red States are telling the beginning of a bigger story.
 
Constitutional limitations having been trashed, one must surely consider dark-horse candidate Jeremy Corbyn whose agenda is very much in tune with mainstream members of The Democrat Party.

Now get off your asses and figure out who Corbyn is and what he stands for 'cause I'm not gonna do all your work for ya.
 

Forum List

Back
Top