WorldWatcher
Gold Member
Step in what? I was wrong on the point of the decsion, it happens. What doesnt have to happen is you being a condescending prick.
Seems to me you were the one that mentioned rights not being listed in the Constitution.
I questioned you upon YOUR statement and suddenly I'm the prick?
Little defensive aren't you.
>>>>
Was waiting to be called defensive. I call it calling you out on being an arrogant ass.
Well, yes I've been known to be an asshat and an arrogant ass. Usually by people that pull stuff out of the ass and I call them on it.
I was incorrect on my view on loving.
Agreed.
To me a ban on interracial marriage is a 15th amendment violation on its face. You dont have to go to the 14th, and in doing so you make it a weaker judgement.
The 15th Amendment ("The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.") has nothing to do with Civil Marriage, it has to do with voting.
I still challenge you to find the word marriage in the consitution.
I never claimed that the word marriage is in the Constitution. I also did not try to imply that rights don't exist unless enumerated in the Constution - such as - asking people to find the word "marriage" in the Constitution.
>>>>