...said he is worth $10,000,000,000 (with a 'B')...but can't.....

"Do YOU have 5% of your net worth in cash?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I do not.

Nor, do I claim in a deposition just last year that I have 'substantially in excess" of $400 million in cash.

We have, I believe, 400 plus and going up very substantially every month,”
per reportage in Politico, and others, in February of 2024.

Reported, ABC News: "Asked about those covenants -- Trump only addressed the cash on hand. "They always want to make sure the cash was substantial," Trump said, claiming that he had $300 to $400 million in cash....... "I've had a lot of cash for a long time," Trump said. "That is all they cared about."

-------------------------------------------

So, as competent prosecutors wouldn't we want to go...first, to secure this alleged $400 million+ ?

Wouldn't that be the low-hanging fruit that James' office would want to pick first?

I think I would.
 
Do YOU have 5% of your net worth in cash?

Cash in this instant? No.

Can I get cash in 30 days? Yes.

See there is one big difference between FPOTUS#45 and I...

..... ..... ..... Banks will loan me money.

WW
.
.
.
.
(But really I could get the money in 30 days without a loan.)
 
The attorney general's office also offered a suggestion – turn properties over to the judge.

“If defendants were truly unable to provide an undertaking, they at a minimum should have consented to have their real-estate interests held by Supreme Court to satisfy the judgment …. or should have otherwise pledged security in real-estate holdings with sufficient value to secure payment of the entire judgment.”

But that would mean facing an honest assessment, not whining that the judge claims MaraLardo is only worth $18M and not the $1.8B he wants his followers to believe.
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I do not.

Nor, do I claim in a deposition just last year that I have 'substantially in excess" of $400 million in cash.

We have, I believe, 400 plus and going up very substantially every month,”
per reportage in Politico, and others, in February of 2024.

Reported, ABC News: "Asked about those covenants -- Trump only addressed the cash on hand. "They always want to make sure the cash was substantial," Trump said, claiming that he had $300 to $400 million in cash....... "I've had a lot of cash for a long time," Trump said. "That is all they cared about."

-------------------------------------------

So, as competent prosecutors wouldn't we want to go...first, to secure this alleged $400 million+ ?

Wouldn't that be the low-hanging fruit that James' office would want to pick first?

I think I would.
When he says "cash", he means liquid assets. Sure he could sell off all his stocks and empty out his bank accounts, but that would be more davastating than losing a building or two.
 
"When he says "cash", he means liquid assets. Sure he could sell off all his stocks and empty out his bank accounts, but that would be more davastating than losing a building or two."
---------------------------------------------------------------

Choices. Choices.
My Pop, long long gone...used to advise my brothers and I that the secret to happiness was having: Choices.

And so it is with Don Trump. Give up "liquid assets".
Or a golf course, or a building.....or several.

Choices. Choices.

So start making 'em, Don.
 
Something seems to be amiss.

Don Trump not that long ago said he was worth $10 billion.
Now, today he says he can't raise either the $464 million in cash, or $10% of that for a bond......while he appeals the fraud judgement against him.

Now, why?
Did he squander about $9 billion since he claimed he had 10 billion?
If he did, how?
Was he fibbing about the $10 billion?
And if he was....why?

Or, is he fibbing now about being unable raise the significantly less than a billion the court says he owes.

Seems there are some unanswered questions here.


Will the DA begin seizure actions?
If so, which properties are most easily seized and most likely to be surety for the $464,000,000 the court says he owes.

And, how does his failure to raise the required court-ordered monies in this case impact the awards in the E. Jean Carroll cases?
The fortunes of millionaires and billionaires is calculated from property value, stocks and shares etc..

If you inherited a $10bn skyscraper, you suddenly become a billionaire with the same balance in your bank account. And no matter how ignorant people are about basic finance, you as a billionaire still have fuck all in your bank account.
 
This is mental.
In your capitalist paradise how do creditors get the compensation they are owed.?
By contract, and only what is owed in the contract, the fact that you do not understand the difference here is why you cannot tell what a confiscation of wealth is when it is so obvious...and why do you object to this being called "socialism" if you believe it is right and just?
 
By contract, and only what is owed in the contract, the fact that you do not understand the difference here is why you cannot tell what a confiscation of wealth is when it is so obvious...and why do you object to this being called "socialism" if you believe it is right and just?
He owes the state. There is your contract. When he pays the tab it will be satisfied. It isnt complicated.
 
When he says "cash", he means liquid assets. Sure he could sell off all his stocks and empty out his bank accounts, but that would be more davastating than losing a building or two.
Yup. Liquid assets are cash.
What two buildings do you think are worth half a billion?
 
That spells it out precisely tommy, it's the very foundation of socialism from which the stench rises.
Socialism provides us with schools, hospitals, roads and bridges, safe food and medicine, fire and police departments, healthcare and everything else that keeps you safe and comfortable. It probably provides you with an income as well.

Which part stinks the most to you?
 

Forum List

Back
Top