thirteen31
thirteen31
Well, your going to be entertaining! (is my spelling correct?) LOL
Thanks?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, your going to be entertaining! (is my spelling correct?) LOL
Ohhh, that's right, another George Bush blunder ...
Bush is a far bigger murderer than Saddam if you do not count the Iran Iraq war that we supported.
Look, you may be a flaming Conservative, and I respect your attempts to malign me with the icon. That is cool, but the fact remains that Bush made a horrible mistake. He needed to ally Saddam to help remove the Radical Islamic regime in Iran. That would have been a self defensive move for both the US and Saddam. That would be just, according to my political party rules.
LOL and if you don't really know what 'murder' actually means...
ROFLMNAO Leftists...
Hussein was the most prolific user of Islamic Terrorism by proxy... he had used Islamic terrorists to murder US citizen many times and was a direct proponent of international Islamic terrorism;
..
Baathists are not secular, they are Sunni Muslims.
They are not fundementalists muslims, but they remained muslims.
Bullshit. He murdered his way to power.
Saddam was a Damn Good Dictator.
Dictatorships and the Rule by King are closely related. Most Kings were men who seized control of a government, or the sons or grandsons of men who did. Occasionally a granddaughter gets mixed in there. The Bible says that Kings are in power because God essentially "tolerates" them. The same can be said for Dictators.
It is time that Americans realize that a motivated Dictator can be a very effective means of government in the rest of the worlds peoples. We do not have the right to depose them or impose them as we see fit. Boy does that make people in other countries hate us. Even though we may think they need a dictator who sees things our way, that does not mean that the majority of the people see it that way
Most Americans who know their history know that the United States has imposed Dictatorships on Latin America and southern Asia when we felt like it. Dictatorships are stable and if we put the right man in power can be very useful for their economy, long term business contracts, alliances and so on. We have established a precedent of installing dictators when it served our purposes. Those on the right in our country say, "Well, Joe, we had to install that Dictatorship because we had to stop the spread of World Communism. As long as they see World Communism as a threat, they are right (In "their" heads - minds).
Dictators are not necessarily "Evil" just because they have a few peope killed who need killing. Stalin, Hitler, Ancient Kings and even Saddam had to occasionally do away with people who stood in the way of progress (as the Dictator or King saw it). As long as that progress is beneficial to the net populace, then it is good even if it helps consolidate the rule of the man in power (and/or enriches his family).
But, Joe, you say, "Killing people is murder." Of course you are right, but a few dead malcontents is not as bad as a third of a million dead like in Iraq when we tried to impose regime change. Very wasteful of human life!
Let me hear the Congregation say Amen to that proposition!
Please remember, I am the most conservative member of this board. I know of no instance when the above statement has any validity. Would you name several of these instances that you are aware of (that nobody else has ever heard of).
In my international studies, I know of no instances that would validate your statement, and your honesty and moral character are now seriously in question.
Please cite your "examples."